Jimothy, this might be a trap! Didn't Dwight say that Toby's favorite game is chess? I've got a bad feeling about this Bug person!
- Date Mike
Jimothy, this might be a trap! Didn't Dwight say that Toby's favorite game is chess? I've got a bad feeling about this Bug person!
They stole my "kill it with fire" line but they do need to die.In post 23, Sou and Kanna wrote:hello friends, i am back! seeing how this game is very active and how everyone is so eagar to post, i have decided to make a detailed readslist that will hopefully accurately reflect my current feelings on the gamestate!
Michael Scott (Auro + volxen)- this slot is locktown in my eyes. their entrance (in post 5) is brimming with a relaxed, confident tone that is never seen in players of the scum alignment. posts like 13 and 20 show a great will to solve the game and a profound analysis of the gamestate that can only come from an uninformed perspective. and the brilliance of 21 can only come from someone pure of heart. if anyone were to ever vote for this slot to be executed, i'd wonder if that person is purposefully trying to throw the game.
Bingle- bingle is my second most confident townread. his early posts 6 and 15 show a deep interest in this game's mechanical side, which is something i have personally only ever seen from bingle when he was aligned with the town. the confidence and passion with which he presents his reads in 15 make me strongly believe it's coming from a genuine place.
clidd- while the number of universes in which clidd is aligned with the mafia is non-zero, i highly doubt that we are living in one of them. his opening in post 10 is very very similar to his one of his early posts in Micro 941 in which his slot was aligned with the town. based on what's happened so far, i have no reason to doubt his alignment is not the same this game.
Porkens- this one is tricky. while post 8 by itself, as funny as it is, is not alignment indicative, when looked at the full picture, i do conclude it is indicative of porkens being town more often than not. what led me to that conclusion is the fact that i can draw some obvious parallels between porkens's play this game and his play in Why Gun?? - namely posting one big "memey" post then disappearing. the reason this is somewhat town!indicative is because porkens was aligned with the mafia in the aforementioned game, and based on what's happened so far, i have no reason to think scum!porkens would repeat the same play.
AGar- dead null. i have nothing on this guy.
Kmd4390- looking at their ISO, they're a scumlean of mine. while post 7 is NAI, post 22 reads like blatant fake dumbtelling to me. "what even is this thread", we're playing mafia, silly! i doubt you didn't know that, though.
xReckonerX- i think it's very likely reckoner is aligned with the mafia. my train of thought is that in 9 he voted against agar with a comment "game's too easy", implying he's already solved agar's slot and that agar is mafia. however, in his next post in 12, he changes his vote to porkens. this makes me think that the earlier confidence and bravado of 9 is fake and fabricated, which is scum!indicative. also, as my hydra partner's already observed, why did you quote the chess post.
bugspray- unfortunately, i think this is another game where bugs rolled scum against me. post 16 offers nothing game related, and i know scum!bugs struggles to make game-related content. and since then, bugs has suspiciously gone quiet, not even responding to the chess move in 21. i'm sorry you rolled scum again, bugs.
Sou and Kanna (Datisi + Kanna)- this is obvscum. kill it with fire.
okay, that's all for now! i will be back later!
~sou
before i care too much how serious are these reads on a scale of 1-10In post 23, Sou and Kanna wrote:hello friends, i am back! seeing how this game is very active and how everyone is so eagar to post, i have decided to make a detailed readslist that will hopefully accurately reflect my current feelings on the gamestate!
Michael Scott (Auro + volxen)- this slot is locktown in my eyes. their entrance (in post 5) is brimming with a relaxed, confident tone that is never seen in players of the scum alignment. posts like 13 and 20 show a great will to solve the game and a profound analysis of the gamestate that can only come from an uninformed perspective. and the brilliance of 21 can only come from someone pure of heart. if anyone were to ever vote for this slot to be executed, i'd wonder if that person is purposefully trying to throw the game.
Bingle- bingle is my second most confident townread. his early posts 6 and 15 show a deep interest in this game's mechanical side, which is something i have personally only ever seen from bingle when he was aligned with the town. the confidence and passion with which he presents his reads in 15 make me strongly believe it's coming from a genuine place.
clidd- while the number of universes in which clidd is aligned with the mafia is non-zero, i highly doubt that we are living in one of them. his opening in post 10 is very very similar to his one of his early posts in Micro 941 in which his slot was aligned with the town. based on what's happened so far, i have no reason to doubt his alignment is not the same this game.
Porkens- this one is tricky. while post 8 by itself, as funny as it is, is not alignment indicative, when looked at the full picture, i do conclude it is indicative of porkens being town more often than not. what led me to that conclusion is the fact that i can draw some obvious parallels between porkens's play this game and his play in Why Gun?? - namely posting one big "memey" post then disappearing. the reason this is somewhat town!indicative is because porkens was aligned with the mafia in the aforementioned game, and based on what's happened so far, i have no reason to think scum!porkens would repeat the same play.
AGar- dead null. i have nothing on this guy.
Kmd4390- looking at their ISO, they're a scumlean of mine. while post 7 is NAI, post 22 reads like blatant fake dumbtelling to me. "what even is this thread", we're playing mafia, silly! i doubt you didn't know that, though.
xReckonerX- i think it's very likely reckoner is aligned with the mafia. my train of thought is that in 9 he voted against agar with a comment "game's too easy", implying he's already solved agar's slot and that agar is mafia. however, in his next post in 12, he changes his vote to porkens. this makes me think that the earlier confidence and bravado of 9 is fake and fabricated, which is scum!indicative. also, as my hydra partner's already observed, why did you quote the chess post.
bugspray- unfortunately, i think this is another game where bugs rolled scum against me. post 16 offers nothing game related, and i know scum!bugs struggles to make game-related content. and since then, bugs has suspiciously gone quiet, not even responding to the chess move in 21. i'm sorry you rolled scum again, bugs.
Sou and Kanna (Datisi + Kanna)- this is obvscum. kill it with fire.
okay, that's all for now! i will be back later!
~sou
it isIn post 17, xRECKONERx wrote:ok well i fucking hate thisIn post 16, bugspray wrote:VOTE: sou and Kama I'm rvsing datisi. Also I think it would be productive to play chess peppered in to some stuff and to randomize color I will use dice and then basically do my first move if I am white and if I'm black then I'll assume you just go e4 and respond with c5
1 I'm w and 2 I'm bOriginal Roll String: 1d2(STATIC) 1 2-Sided Dice: (1) = 1
so white if it's not e4 then you can choose a different first move if you want and also this should be considered an open chellenge so anyone who wants to battle me chess can
u said this post was "fake and fabricated" confidence & bravado
In post 15, Bingle wrote:In post 0, Aristophanes wrote:6. If a player has hit the daily limit and depleted their reserve, they are allowed one naked vote change per in-game Day.@mod: As written, this means that once your reserve is empty you may only change your vote once for the remainder of the phase. Can you clarify that this is what you intended?
In post 28, bugspray wrote:@mod does my post limit reset ever 24 hours? im not super familiar with geriatric but playing this hoping it will imrpove my ability to make posts that are more rich in content
i dont know who sou & kanna are, and in reading their read on me, it seemed so on-its-face ridiculous that i thought there was a good chance it was a jokeIn post 33, clidd wrote:Reckoner -> Ignorance in post 29 when referring to post 23, bad tone in general. I'm evaluating whether this is linked to his profile baseline.
I voted them BECAUSE of 23. Clumping two people together and making such a blanket readIn post 33, clidd wrote: Agar / Bugspray -> They ignored post 23 and voted regardless of the observations that SK (I'll use this acronym now) made.
~kannaIn post 19, Sou and Kanna wrote:why is this? i wanna say i agree with Porkens, but i don't see Agar at allIn post 15, Bingle wrote:I believe Agar and Porkens to be slightly more likely to be town than the rest of you.
~kanna
can you elaborate on these?In post 38, bugspray wrote:I voted them BECAUSE of 23. Clumping two people together and making such a blanket read
also now a super tr for reconer because hes totally town
also kinda sr clidd because while its very tonally similar to the clidd~town i know im p sure this is a different one
Take a look:In post 37, xRECKONERx wrote: i dont know who sou & kanna are, and in reading their read on me, it seemed so on-its-face ridiculous that i thought there was a good chance it was a joke
can you elaborate on "bad tone"
I'll give you more time to think.In post 38, bugspray wrote: I voted them BECAUSE of 23. Clumping two people together and making such a blanket read
also now a super tr for reconer because hes totally town
also kinda sr clidd because while its very tonally similar to the clidd~town i know im p sure this is a different one
I filtered what you typed in post 23 and I don't think it was entirely a joke. There were exaggerations in the way you expressed the impressions, but the starting point of observation that you used in each of the slots did not seem random/invented but rather genuine (that is, it started from an idea you had about each one and tried to expand). It's basically what I did in my old wallpost playstyle, where I took an idea and converted it into an impression, usually being what I thought about the slot, but with an exaggeration of assumptions to reach a conclusion (as town).In post 41, Sou and Kanna wrote:@clidd, knowing my readslist in 23 is a joke, how does that influence your read on us?
This post is a quilt of subtext upon which a close examination reveals the author’s state of mind and intent.In post 4, Sou and Kanna wrote:since putting gifs while on mobile is a pain, please imagine a gif of jim moriarty saying hi to sherlock.
VOTE: clidd
hi.
~sou
Why did you use "the author" instead of his name/they ?In post 43, Porkens wrote:This post is a quilt of subtext upon which a close examination reveals the author’s state of mind and intent.In post 4, Sou and Kanna wrote:since putting gifs while on mobile is a pain, please imagine a gif of jim moriarty saying hi to sherlock.
VOTE: clidd
hi.
~sou
The author was very conscious of the amount of effort they put into this post and wanted us to know why they made that specific level of effort. The post is somewhat self-deprecating, as the author tacitly admits that the value of the message would not be worth the effort to deliver it as described.
On the subject of effort, it is also important to note that the author had at their disposal simpler options, e.g. “moriarti.gif,” which would have conveyed the same basic surface level message.
However, instead, the author engages the reader in at least two functions of discourse: excuse and request. The use of “please” and the excuse for the lack of effort place the reader in a dominant position relative to the author.
The choice of object is also highly significant. The author casts themselves in the role of the villain! This naturally invites the reader to experience a sense of irony and self-awareness, which are both humorous and endearing feelings.
Finally, the post implies a fondness and rivalry with clidd that the author hopes to rekindle in our present game. This functions both as a reason for the vote and an invitation to renew the bond of mutual playfulness.
In summary, the author was consciously aware of the level and nature of attention they would receive as a result of this post. They took active measures to diminish the importance of their message, and assumed a subordinate posture in the discourse.
In my opinion the post is highly contrived and specifically designed to give the impression that the author is town. My hypothesis is that the author is, in fact, scum, and they are trying to pocket clidd.
VOTE: Sou and Kanna
I was writing with a Sigmund Freud voice in my head and "the author" sounded better and fancier than "they."In post 47, clidd wrote:Why did you use "the author" instead of his name/they ?
Sou is Datisi, Kanna is Kanna. Both are fairly new, and iirc Datisi was a Paragon contender last year.In post 37, xRECKONERx wrote:i dont know who sou & kanna are, and in reading their read on me, it seemed so on-its-face ridiculous that i thought there was a good chance it was a jokeIn post 33, clidd wrote:Reckoner -> Ignorance in post 29 when referring to post 23, bad tone in general. I'm evaluating whether this is linked to his profile baseline.
can you elaborate on "bad tone"