Open 792: Masons and Monks GAME OVER

brassherald · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:22 am

At one point in the D&D 5e player's handbook, it starts referring to Monk Weapons, which is a previously undefined term. This is poor writing, unlike my flavor text.

Votecount 1.03

Hayasaka (3):

Dunnstral, AGar, SirCakez

dramonic (2):

Xayah, davesaz

AGar (1):

Hayasaka

davesaz (1):

dramonic

Elements (1):

The Bulge

Not_Mafia (1):

Not_Mafia

notscience (1):

Almost50

SirCakez (1):

Elements

Not Voting (2):

Malakittens, notscience

With 13 in residence, it takes 7 votes to send someone down the mountain.
Day 1 will end in (expired on 2020-08-31 17:40:00)

Almost50 · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:23 am

In post 173, notscience wrote:@A50 I’m still waiting for the data to back up your statistics.

I can't provide any links. Try searching for "why is X being wagoned" or "why is there a wagon on X" and tell me what you find (hint: Search will only recognize the words "wagom/wagoned" as valis search items and will return each and every occurrence of the word in a thread which does not help. It's not like I'm searching for the word "notsience")

But what is your point? I failed to provide evidence so the jury should acquit you? Fine. I am the DA in that case though and I still say you are scum for it. If the day should end before new evidence is presented you will be free to go.

Almost50 · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:24 am

In post 175, brassherald wrote:VC

Vividly cunning?

ISO · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:29 am

In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.

Scum response

Not_Mafia · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:31 am

In post 178, SirCakez wrote:
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.
Scum response

Wrong

Elements · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:32 am

In post 179, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 178, SirCakez wrote:
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.
Scum response
Wrong

Right

Not_Mafia · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:32 am

In post 180, Elements wrote:
In post 179, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 178, SirCakez wrote:
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.
Scum response
Wrong
Right

Wrong

Elements · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:37 am

In post 181, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 180, Elements wrote:
In post 179, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 178, SirCakez wrote:
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.
Scum response
Wrong
Right
Wrong

Right

notscience · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:39 am

In post 176, Almost50 wrote:
In post 173, notscience wrote:@A50 I’m still waiting for the data to back up your statistics.
I can't provide any links. Try searching for "why is X being wagoned" or "why is there a wagon on X" and tell me what you find (hint: Search will only recognize the words "wagom/wagoned" as valis search items and will return each and every occurrence of the word in a thread which does not help. It's not like I'm searching for the word "notsience")

But what is your point? I failed to provide evidence so the jury should acquit you? Fine. I am the DA in that case though and I still say you are scum for it. If the day should end before new evidence is presented you will be free to go.

It’s the job of the accuser to do the research. My point is baseless claims are good ways for scum to hide behind unless called out upon. This “you go find it you’re still scum” doesn’t show town trying to divine my alignment.

VOTE: almost50

Almost50 · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:40 am

In post 180, Elements wrote:
In post 179, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 178, SirCakez wrote:
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.
Scum response
Wrong
Right

Left

Almost50 · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:43 am

In post 183, notscience wrote:It’s the job of the accuser to do the research. My point is baseless claims are good ways for scum to hide behind unless called out upon. This “you go find it you’re still scum” doesn’t show town trying to divine my alignment.

VOTE: almost50

Thank you for teaching me to play. I'll keep your advice close to my heart.

Not_Mafia · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:43 am

In post 182, Elements wrote:
In post 181, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 180, Elements wrote:
In post 179, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 178, SirCakez wrote:
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.
Scum response
Wrong
Right
Wrong
Right

Wrong[/quote]

Not_Mafia · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:44 am

VOTE: notscience

Elements · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:45 am

In post 186, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 182, Elements wrote:
In post 181, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 180, Elements wrote:
In post 179, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 178, SirCakez wrote:
In post 174, Almost50 wrote:
In post 171, SirCakez wrote:A50 looking like haya's buddy here
Ohm damn! You got us. Sorry, Haya. I tried.
Scum response
Wrong
Right
Wrong
Right
Wrong[ /quote]

ha

Elements · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:46 am

VOTE: notscience

notscience · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:50 am

UNVOTE:

Just realized scum actually have to scum hunt this game.

So that basis is off.

Wagon on me is ass but I digress

Elements · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:54 am

In post 190, notscience wrote:UNVOTE:

Don't like this.

notscience · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:55 am

Don’t care, I was pushing someone on the context they weren’t trying to divine my sign meant, took the browns to the super bowl and changed my mind on reflection.

Elements · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 10:01 am

In post 192, notscience wrote:Don’t care, I was pushing someone on the context they weren’t trying to divine my sign meant, took the browns to the super bowl and changed my mind on reflection.

like this even less

Hayasaka · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 10:13 am

NotSci explain your AGar and Dunnstral read.
I don't care how shit the explanation is.

notscience · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 10:16 am

Agar feels very similar to his intro in mini 2146 we played together a month ago.

I feel like this is the same dunn town intro I’ve seen in minis 2153 and 2148.

Hayasaka · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 10:19 am

In post 195, notscience wrote:Agar feels very similar to his intro in mini 2146 we played together a month ago.

I feel like this is the same dunn town intro I’ve seen in minis 2153 and 2148.

Ok sounds good.

davesaz · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:05 pm

On the one hand, it's slow enough that keeping up isn't an issue.
On the other hand, too many are still at a dead null right now from lack of content.
Cakez downgrade to null.
N_M weak scum.
Elements went from passively mediocre to actively mediocre.
Xayah is definitely not meeting proficiency standards but I give allowance to the possibility of RL interference.

Xayah · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:47 pm

It's not hard to keep up with this game. The hard part is finding stuff I consider of value.

AGar · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Wed Aug 19, 2020 1:04 pm

In post 157, Hayasaka wrote:
In post 116, AGar wrote: I mean... Isn't that the exact shit you're accusing dave of? Posting noncommittal shit that can just be handwaved away?
Let's assume the statement is correct, I am doing what I am accusing dave of. If I think X makes someone scum I can do X by mistake it doesn't stop X from being scum indicative. It doesn't actually invalidate the statement I made.
Or the real world where he is just misrepresenting what is going on. Neither is a good look.

I mean you copped to posting noncommittal shit so it's not "doing X by mistake," it's "consciously doing something you say is scum indicative." My main pushback is that I don't believe it's indicative and I think you're grasping at shit reasons while being logically inconsistent.

In post 113, Hayasaka wrote:I went back to skim the thread.

Who has posted and isn't on my wagon that isn't Dave or NotSci.
I am not sure who you think I am ignoring?

I don't particularly think you were ignoring anyone directly. Your focus seemed acutely on survival.

But this seems to be a particular dead end right now - I believe we're talking right past one another at this point.

Would love to see actual content from A50 and N_M, would love to see a presence from mala.

Agree hard with 198.