<33
sou means well though!
~kanna
<33
lmaooooo get rekt
I mean, if anyone dies he's town, right?In post 480, Kmd4390 wrote:I'll jail reck. If I die he's town.
Correct.In post 482, AGar wrote:I mean, if anyone dies he's town, right?In post 480, Kmd4390 wrote:I'll jail reck. If I die he's town.
G R O S SIn post 486, Klick wrote:Looool I suck.
No-kill gambit is entirely plausible in this scenario - it's got a 5/7 shot of practically guaranteeing a misfloss if Kmd targeted a townie, and they gain the kill back eventually because we're on evens.
There are plenty of people who don't make much sense as SK's partner, this game should practically be a lock. I highly doubt AGar goes for the hard bus all day yesterday. Still think it's super doubtful that it's Bell.
That leaves {Reck, MS, Bingle} in about that order. And I don't really think it's Bingle.
I'd also like to posit that 'blatantly buddying my scumbuddy' isn't a strat I'd be likely to go for as scum replacing into this game lol.
From my POV there are only two possibilities: Reck is scum (99% likely) or you are scum (1% likely at this point). Because objectively speaking, no-killing on night one when one scum is already outed and is the guaranteed day two elimination is a misplay for scum. If Reck actually is town, for scum to successfully frame him via mechanics, they have to no-kill for two nights in a row: if they only no-kill on night one and then kill KMD on night two (or anyone else for that matter), then Reck automatically becomes confirmed town, thus negating the whole point of no-killing on night one to begin with. On the other hand, if scum goes for the frame Reck route and no-kills again on night two, then they very likely would pull off the Reck mis-elimination on day three, but then they need a total of four mis-eliminations (instead of the usual three mis-eliminations) to meet their win condition. Which again defeats the purpose of the whole gambit -- scum would be much better off with just killing KMD on night one and trying to win through dayplay.In post 486, Klick wrote:Looool I suck.
No-kill gambit is entirely plausible in this scenario - it's got a 5/7 shot of practically guaranteeing a misfloss if Kmd targeted a townie, and they gain the kill back eventually because we're on evens.
There are plenty of people who don't make much sense as SK's partner, this game should practically be a lock. I highly doubt AGar goes for the hard bus all day yesterday. Still think it's super doubtful that it's Bell.
That leaves {Reck, MS, Bingle} in about that order. And I don't really think it's Bingle.
I'd also like to posit that 'blatantly buddying my scumbuddy' isn't a strat I'd be likely to go for as scum replacing into this game lol.
Aye.In post 482, AGar wrote:I mean, if anyone dies he's town, right?In post 480, Kmd4390 wrote:I'll jail reck. If I die he's town.
No kill gambit would be hilarious, but it's really not worth worrying over for town. See y'all tomorrow.In post 486, Klick wrote:Looool I suck.
No-kill gambit is entirely plausible in this scenario - it's got a 5/7 shot of practically guaranteeing a misfloss if Kmd targeted a townie, and they gain the kill back eventually because we're on evens.
There are plenty of people who don't make much sense as SK's partner, this game should practically be a lock. I highly doubt AGar goes for the hard bus all day yesterday. Still think it's super doubtful that it's Bell.
That leaves {Reck, MS, Bingle} in about that order. And I don't really think it's Bingle.
I'd also like to posit that 'blatantly buddying my scumbuddy' isn't a strat I'd be likely to go for as scum replacing into this game lol.