In post 1330, GuiltyLion wrote: In post 1320, Morning Tweet wrote:I'm beginning to see why tea leaves suggested GL/Farren the other day. If im not screwing up which I definitely am but still, it'd mean 1-2 of them is scum. Both I highly doubt
What is your actual read on tea leaves, though
like you say you might be getting tricked on them, but you're voting in a dichotomy that they presented?
and if Farren flips town, does that mean you vote me tomorrow?
Town. I'm not voting in GL/Farren *because* they presented it, I arrived to that conclusion and then had the realization that they said the same thing yesterday.
If Farren died instantly + flipped town at the time I made that post, then yeah I'd switch to you. Not necessarily if we're talking a large time gap, because my reads change sporadically sometimes
Are you implying im sort of setting up easy miselim votes for myself or somethin? So I can be like "it was tea leaves idea!" or something?
In post 1338, tea leaves wrote: In post 1332, GuiltyLion wrote: In post 1321, tea leaves wrote:As Morning mentioned, it's pretty easy to tell I'm on both wagons because it naturally follows from my earlier reads.
this is also kinda silly reasoning to defend yourself as town, scum are going to make sure their reads align with their votes
I'm interested in seeing whether a wagon on you here can get off the ground given it swung away twice yesterday
No, it's the fact you're using the the reasoning that I was on both wagons to support your argument. It labels me as opportunistic, when that's not the case since those were my bottom two scumreads.
"You were on both counterwagons!"
"Yes, but those two were at the bottom of my reads so it only makes sense."
"That's a bad reason for you being town, of course scum would line up their votes with their reads!"
Am i missing anything here?