Open 794 Pick Your Power X/Y (finished)

[word321]

Theres also the possibility of mafia giving heterogeneous numbers on different number of games, but consistently trying to get at least one high
So we could have situations when most towns can go for 4/5/6s, few towns go 1/2/3, few towns go 13 and Mafia always goes 1/5/13 or shenanigans like that

[word321]

But it is important and relevant that mafia gets higher prs more consistently, that I agree

[word321]

not that their more likely to choose low numbers

[DrDolittle]

That's a lot of words to say nothing

[word321]

Specially considering scum is also interested in killing the high Town picks; so what remains can be indeed indicative of scum
OC, none of this can be applyed by itself

[word321]

whats ur intention voting Iamusername?

[Grumpy Cat]

To ascertain Mafia goes for higher numbers more likely we must first compare if their apparent efficiency fits with the efficiency of simply knowing their other numbers only, and not due to choosing higher numbers

Mafia pick higher numbers! Why they do is irrelevant but I'm going to argue about it anyway.

%_%

[word321]

mafia getting higher places on the pick is different that going for higher numbers
it was a commentary either way

[word321]

Im not doubting they dnt get higher places, Im doubting that the particular

Numbers

they pick are higher, cause they can coordinately pick a wide range of numbers; NO town can pick 1 and get away with it if mafia always pick 1, therefore it is less likely that town with high numbers will get good roles if they can be "blocked" for example, while mafia gets both the chance of getting away with it and at least decent roles if they also pick a safe alternative for someone else, like a high number

[Datisi]

I dnt like DrDolittle a.k.a. Doc from now on
VOTE: DrDolittle

can you talk about this instead?

[DrDolittle]

He jelly I'm number 1 pick and therefore the best

[word321]

heyya datisi, long time no see

[word321]

I want motivation of vote
if it was for pressure, it wasnt followed by no direct confrontation to the slot for more content

[Datisi]

not quite true, i was the backup of 2019

but yeah, been a minute. got any hot takes for me?

[word321]

The timestamps also indicate that it was highly reactive in nature, in the sense that he voted based on a single interaction without waiting for the particular follow uo

[Grumpy Cat]

it gets worse;

draft numbers selected by 42 scum across 14 games;

1 - xxxxxxxx
2 - xxx
3 - xxx
4 - xxxx
5 - xxxx
6 - xxxx
7 - x
8 - xxx
9 - x
10 - xx
11 - x
12 - x
13 - x
15 - x
20 - x
22 - x
42 - xx
413 - x

[word321]

so I think he saw iamusername's entrance, found it particularly scummy for some reason or requiring more content, all of wich a priori is nonindicative, but hasnt given a follow up more than a vote; either way, some content from that slot would be nice

[Grumpy Cat]

I want motivation of vote
if it was for pressure, it wasnt followed by no direct confrontation to the slot for more content

I did that too, stop ignoring me. It's rude

[word321]

it gets worse;

draft numbers selected by 42 scum across 14 games;

1 - xxxxxxxx
2 - xxx
3 - xxx
4 - xxxx
5 - xxxx
6 - xxxx
7 - x
8 - xxx
9 - x
10 - xx
11 - x
12 - x
13 - x
15 - x
20 - x
22 - x
42 - xx
413 - x

Again, 1 in particular denies town any single 1s, wich I may partially agree, but there is no evidence that the rest of it is incompatible with town

[Grumpy Cat]

I don't really get what we're even talking about anymore tbh

[word321]

lets better move out from theory wise then

[word321]

not quite true, i was the backup of 2019

but yeah, been a minute. got any hot takes for me?

I do get that u probably have a dependency of caffeine
I didnt get any weird vibes from the slot, so I give3 it a null for now

[Datisi]

not quite true, i was the backup of 2019

but yeah, been a minute. got any hot takes for me?

I do get that u probably have a dependency of caffeine
I didnt get any weird vibes from the slot, so I give3 it a null for now

that is correct

also is the bottom line about me?

[word321]

yup
I read "got any hot takes on me?" instead of "for me" by mistake

[Grumpy Cat]

I want motivation of vote
if it was for pressure, it wasnt followed by no direct confrontation to the slot for more content

I did that too, stop ignoring me. It's rude

But seriously, word; aren't like a lot of people doing this?