Servant Avenger wrote:Why?
I had to check to be sure when I read that post. In a quick scan of your iso I don't see anything that indicates you weren't townreading me. You've asked me questions, but I don't recall any followup. We've just not had interactions that I'd associate with being carefully weighed over several days.
In post 684, Servant Foreigner wrote: In post 682, Servant Alter Ego wrote:What are your thoughts about Saber? I don't see much mention of them in your iso, Do they fit your ideas about choosing a player to upgrade?
If I had a good answer to this question I wouldn't be asking the question.
I think I lean town on the slot but a heavy emphasis on the word think.
I think my future involves voting Avenger.
I'm at the point where I need to go through things with a fine tooth comb again, to make sure I've got players meshed right with their posts, and give a deep look at what players say about each other and how that maps to their votes.
For instance, Shielder's Saber vote doesn't have much basis from their catchup posts. And there was a post they made yesterday(?) that I flagged to myself as a possible scum slip (it may be nothing, but I want to keep it on the table. So, Shielder listing a few townreads, most of which aren't controversial, and then votes for the one on the list that I have the weakest read of set off an alarm. Now I want to look at Saber more closely.
If I think about going with something like the sort of vote that Moon Cancer has suggested, then I'd want to vote someone who looks like they could be really awesome as town (especially if they didn't have to fight a lot of paranoia) or really dangerous as scum.