Mini Theme 2162: Wherewolf [Game over | Village win]

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:57 am

Town
A50
Bright

leaning town
Taylor

leaning scum
Element

unknown
everyone else

Almost50 · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:01 am

Unless I missed it, I don't think insomnia/ItalianoVD/Pine/spicer1209/WeyounsLastClone claimed Corrupt/Not Corrupt explicitly yet

Almost50 · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:03 am

And I am for checking Elements too. I assume Fuzzy doesn't mind it (he's got Elements as Scum) so that's THREE votes on Elements to checked

@Clairvoyant

Elements · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:46 am

why do you hate me a50?

Almost50 · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:00 am

I don't. Why is checking you a problem if you're NC??

Elements · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:10 am

it's a waste

Almost50 · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:15 am

No it's not. If we have a "Corrupt check" you're caught scum. If we don't you're conf!town (at least to me you are, because I don't think you are a Defector the way you have been playing)

Elements · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:24 am

yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste

brighteningskies · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:38 am

In post 82, Elements wrote:yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste

A non corrupt result is never a waste as it proves you're telling the truth
It's suspicious to me that you're describing it as such. We can't just take at face value you're not a wolf or we're gonna all be gobbled up!

Elements · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:40 am

In post 83, brighteningskies wrote:
In post 82, Elements wrote:yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste
A non corrupt result is never a waste as it proves you're telling the truth

it's a waste if it's on me

brighteningskies · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:35 am

In post 84, Elements wrote:
In post 83, brighteningskies wrote:
In post 82, Elements wrote:yes, so when you get a non-corrupt result you'll see it was a waste
A non corrupt result is never a waste as it proves you're telling the truth
it's a waste if it's on me

Does anyone else think this sounds like either a wolf or a Jester??
Like why else be so against being checked?

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:39 am

the more elements wants to not be investigated the more worthwhile it seems like it will be. we should probably set up a backup investigation in case we suggest that the clairvoyant be investigated, so we still have a directed target

Elements · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:39 am

are you all rlly bad at reading within the lines?
I've basically claimed at this point

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:03 pm

Element

why would you do that? If you did claim it was an incredible bad decison. Anyways why should we believe you.

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:03 pm

Element

why would you do that? If you did claim it was an incredible bad decison. Anyways why should we believe you.

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:06 pm

yeah and my post gave you a big out to not fullclaim, yet instead you went and made the claim more explicit.

Elements · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:09 pm

In post 90, Tayl0r Swift wrote:yeah and my post gave you a big out to not fullclaim, yet instead you went and made the claim more explicit.

yea, i didn't read it but your town, my bad

Elements · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:10 pm

i don't think it matters too much

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:27 pm

Are you claiming priest or am i missing something?

Elements · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:31 pm

I am not claiming priest

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:58 pm

In post 93, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Are you claiming priest or am i missing something?

stop rolefishing.

Galron · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:11 pm

I'll volunteer to be checked.

Galron · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:40 pm

Looking at the deadline, we have a little less than 48 hours to deadline. I think we should start talking about who we want on the ballot. The talk about claiming and targeting is informative, but I know I'm used to longer deadlines on this site, so I don't want to lose the forest for the trees. We should be talking about the ballot in addition to the other stuff.

Galron · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:45 pm

Hit submit too quickly

Elements has soft claimed. I dunno if I believe it. There's really not enough to go on yet. Fuzzy and skies are obvtown. I'm going to reread A50 because he trolls like it's his job, but he's prima facie town anyway.

Galron · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:48 pm

In post 48, insomnia wrote:
In post 44, Pine wrote:and am inclined to think TFL99 would not be so bold or reckless as scum
Is this a general read or accustomed to what you know of TFL?

In post 49, insomnia wrote:Regardless of what the answer is, what posts did you perceive as "bold" or reckless for page 1?

With no follow-up on these, I've got no idea on insomnia.