Mini Theme 2162: Wherewolf [Game over | Village win]

Glitch · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:11 am

In post 445, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:
Non Votes

Italian
Garlon

Votes

A50- Garlon
FL99-Garlon
Pine-Garlon
Taylor- Garlon
BrightSkies- Garlon

Man With No Name(Garlon?)
Insomnia- Italian (?)
Element(?)
Gitz (?)

I'm on Garlon and have been checked ready to move forward for a while. I don't have anything to add and am ready to move onto the next phase. I got prodded but I just don't really have anything else to add.

Eliminating jester just doesn't seem ideal and if he's a wolf I think we will figure that out pretty soon.

Almost50 · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:03 am

Everyone said they were ready to go forward, so why the freak is this day not over yet??

WeyounsLastClone · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:26 am

Don't see myself on F99's list, but I voted Garlon and checked the box that I'm okay to move one as well.
The other site I started playing since a month or so uses 36 hour day phases, so this game feels a bit slow in comparison.

Looking forward to Day 2 when hopefully we have some Night activity to discuss and hopefully we can start putting pieces together.

CreativeMod1 · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:17 am

Sorry, just gotten online...we now have everyone ready for the end of ballot!

Night 1Galron has been eliminated!

Spoiler: Alive

Spoiler: V/LA

The current deadline is:

(expired on 2020-09-18 19:00:00)

Timezone	Time
PDT	4:00 PM, Fri 18 Sep
EDT	7:00 PM, Fri 18 Sep
BST	12:00 AM, Sat 19 Sep

CreativeMod1 · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:52 pm

Sorry for the delay, my sleep went massively out of wack and was asleep earlier when results should've gone out...just woken up

Day 2It is now Day 2

ManWithNoName died during the night

A Corrupt Player has been found

You may use this link when you wish to vote | Make sure you use your Player Number from your Role PM

The current deadline is:

(expired on 2020-09-23 19:00:00)

Timezone	Time
PDT	4:00 PM, Wed 23 Sep
EDT	7:00 PM, Wed 23 Sep
BST	12:00 AM, Thu 24 Sep

insomnia · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2020 10:25 pm

VOTE: Glitch

Pine · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:20 am

So if we’ve got two Corrupt players found, that’s probably enough for the Clairvoyant to claim and give results.

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:01 am

Pine

Assuming that the clairvoyant did not investigate the sinner during night 0

Glitch · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:18 am

I tried to figure out different ways to drop yall a hint yesterday but couldn't figure out how to without being crazy obvious. Y'all have put me in a very difficult place.

All I can say is that I was not the target of the Clairvoyant last night. There's more that can be said but it's best to remain unseen.

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:43 am

@Glitch
You will prob have to claim..... I dont see any other way unless there is another way you can show that the cop did not target you last night or that we should lynch a better target,

Almost50 · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:48 am

In post 454, CreativeMod1 wrote:A Corrupt Player has been found

Glitch is today's elimination target. I would strongly suggest ALL TOWN ALIGNED PLAYERS put him on the ballot already. We just need to decide whom the Clairvoyant should check next. I probably need some time to think about this one.

Almost50 · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:52 am

In post 456, Pine wrote:So if we’ve got two Corrupt players found, that’s probably enough for the Clairvoyant to claim and give results.

Huh??!! We do have the results!! First night we got a Corrupt result and the Clairvoyant didn't say anything about everyone claiming NC except for brighteningskies, which confirms that's where they checked.

Second night we were clear Glitch was the check target, so that's the second Corrupt check (also claimed NC, so confirmed Scum).

The only reason for the Clairvoyant to claim today is if they did NOT check Glitch (which would be shocking). If Glitch was the check then we eliminate him and decide on the next check target.

Almost50 · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:55 am

In post 458, Glitch wrote:All I can say is that I was not the target of the Clairvoyant last night.

If that's the case the Clairvoyant should claim ASAP. If there's no claim then it was on you.

insomnia · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:32 am

I second A50’s call.

Also, I think Pine was saying that it is possible we may have found both wolves with the peeks and so clairvoyant should out their names, A50.

insomnia · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:33 am

If I wake up to a “How do you know there are two wolves” reply, expect appropriate correction in the form of tunneling into oblivion.

insomnia · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:35 am

I think Galron was not a hit, but I could be wrong. Definitely wouldn’t proceed into the game with any potential associations between him and other people and I don’t think anyone else should either.

Pine · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:50 am

In post 463, insomnia wrote:I second A50’s call.

Also, I think Pine was saying that it is possible we may have found both wolves with the peeks and so clairvoyant should out their names, A50.

Precisely. The point about the Sinner was fair, though.

Almost50 · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:09 pm

OK, so let's make use of the time we have until everybody checks in. Who should we check next?

Almost50 · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:11 pm

My vote will probably go to WLC to be the Clairvoyant check tonight.

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:19 pm

i am here and was not the nightkill last night.

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:22 pm

I voted Glich...... when I saw the results. Glitch needs to claim unless he can prove that the cop did not investigate him.

A50- why WLC?

I want to sort Italian today.....if possible

@TS
Okay...great to know..maybe you can be more helpful please

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:29 pm

In post 470, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:I voted Glich...... when I saw the results. Glitch needs to claim unless he can prove that the cop did not investigate him.

A50- why WLC?

I want to sort Italian today.....if possible

@TS
Okay...great to know..maybe you can be more helpful please

i also did not perform the night kill, nor do i have any knowledge of who did. i dunno why glitch wasnt on the ballot yesterday, and being cryptic today isnt gonna cut it for me tbh. im not gonna vote to end the phase until glitch gives info.

Almost50 · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:45 pm

In post 470, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:A50- why WLC?

I want to sort Italian today.....if possible

WLC is my "next on the list" suspect. I am

against

a check on the OBVIOUS Jester. It's a waste.

But I'll keep track of everyone's preferred check:

A50 -> WLC
Fuzzy -> Italian
skies -> ?
Inso -> ?
Pine -> ?
Swift -> ?
WLC -> ?

Almost50 · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 12:52 pm

In post 471, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also did not perform the night kill, nor do i have any knowledge of who did. i dunno why glitch wasnt on the ballot yesterday, and being cryptic today isnt gonna cut it for me tbh. im not gonna vote to end the phase until glitch gives info.

I get the feeling he's trying to oit the Clairvoyant. Y'know.. hint it.. wait.. then claim it to draw a CC

But if he was the Clairvoyant he would have claimed whom he checked already. There's no reason for him to try and "hint" Clairvoyant here because he

has to

out whom he checked, and he didn't.
Also, remember Glitch didn't have a problem being checked yesterday. Clairvoyant sure would have, or would at least have argued for a better target. But this is how he responded when he was asked if it was alright with him to get checked:

In post 362, Glitch wrote:
In post 351, Almost50 wrote:@Glitch: Do you mind getting checjed tonight by the Clairvoyant? Yes or no, please. No ifs/buts or addendum (You can have that in a separate post if you like, just not in your response to this simple question. Thank you)
No, I don't mind. I have nothing to hide.

I need to go back to the role list and see what Galron is implying.

So, like I said: Unless the Clairvoyant comes forward and tells us they targeted someone else; Glitch is always the correct elimination here.

Almost50 · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:08 pm

@Fuzzy: I dunno why you still suspect Italian might still be Scum. What Scum claims they have a "special win con" in the same post where they claim Corrupted?? The claim to be Corrupted might have been Scum's way to preemptively dodge a guilty, but that would be CLEVER play; which doesn't exactly go with claiming a special wincon. In short, we are probably @ 6v1 after we boot Glitch (not counting Italian), and with one more check guaranteed. Remeber: Even if Scum do kill the Clairvoyant we learn the result if the player is Corrupt, and we get no announcement if the player in NC. If Scum kill the Innkeeper we still have the Clairvoyant themselves to announce the result if they get a guilty, or to stay silent if the check returns NC. Either way we decide if WLC is town or Scum 100%. Why waste a check on someone we already know is NOT Town?