FGO: Mafia in the Lostbelt (Game Over!)

[Cabd]

Vote Count D2-1

With 12 players alive, it will take 7 votes to eliminate a player.

Moon Cancer (4): Berserker, Avenger, Saber, Caster
Lancer (2): Foreigner, Rider

Phase Page Usage: 05/60

Day two will end in: (expired on 2020-09-27 22:00:00)

Information on flipped slots has been added to the first post.

[Servant Foreigner]

I'm asking you to stop role fishing.

[Servant Berserker]

Look, I know that what I did last night succeeded (as in hit any intended target(s) I intended to hit and gave me the expected outcome).

So yeah, there's no subset of roles I can possibly think of that could have not directly interfered with my action(s) AND given you any kind of guilty.

But go ahead and claim you have information to the contrary if you want.

That is not how this works.

I am asking you for.

Your Role Name
Character Name
Identifiers
Abilities
What you used last night
Who you used it on last night
What results you obtained

EVERYTHING.

Maybe my guilty has nothing to do with what you did last night. Maybe it does. I'm just not giving you any details and you fishing for info to try and contest like this only makes you look worse.

[Servant Moon Cancer]

Heh. It amuses me because I think I know what you're hinting at, but I just don't feel like indulging you.

(And to be clear for anyone reading this, nothing in my role would give her any sort of real "guilty".)

I think she knows something about my role, but has zero clue what it means.

[Servant Foreigner]

So claim it

[Servant Moon Cancer]

Maybe my guilty has nothing to do with what you did last night.

I mean, you quite literally only asked me to claim my night actions last night, which tells me that this actually is the case.

And it amuses me because if I had to guess you know who I targeted and the ability name(s), but you don't have any idea what I actually did.

I'm fully aware I could just claim and clear up this mess, but it's more amusing to me to see how far you'll go with this "guilty" and what you'll say about it if my wagon actually does go through.

[Servant Assassin]

...is it an attribute thing? Tell me it's not an attribute thing at least.

[Servant Berserker]

...is it an attribute thing? Tell me it's not an attribute thing at least.

It's not an attribute thing. I just said that to be thorough with my point.

[Servant Foreigner]

In my head, Moon Cancer is at B-2

[Servant Avenger]

He's playing his cards close to his chest. Which I guess would be EV+ if this weren't an anonymous game.
Instead I'm just wondering if this is habit or what.

[Servant Avenger]

My guess?
He probably already thought about how to play when put in this scenario a long time ago and I never thought as deeply about it because I didn't play enough games to ever need to think that much about it.

[Servant Caster]

why can't i hold all this

[Servant Avenger]

In other words, I'm watching, but I don't know whether beserker should stick her neck out for this ultimatum or not.

[Servant Avenger]

Back to being useless, haha wait I already am.

[Servant Caster]

playing to a win condition over "amusement" like some sort of anime villain should be an enforeceable rule

[Servant Assassin]

Okay. Because I got some attribute info when I was elected and was very concerned until I looked up stuff on the wiki. I'll let this play out but

no E-1

until everyone's had a chance to check in and I decide who I'm handing out a bonus to, can post reads, etc.

[Servant Caster]

In other words, I'm watching, but I don't know whether beserker should stick her neck out for this ultimatum or not.

no, we should kill moon cancer if he refuses to give anything up, straight up.

[Servant Moon Cancer]

There's no "ultimatum" lol.

She doesn't have a guilty on me, and if I'm right in my guess about what she does actually know, I'm pretty sure I could clear it up just by claiming.

I'm just too stubborn to care enough about the way she's approaching me to give her the satisfaction.

So if the wagon goes through, it goes through. If it doesn't, it doesn't. So be it. *shrug*

[Servant Assassin]

Back to being useless, haha wait I already am.

You have a reads list you could make?

playing to a win condition over "amusement" like some sort of anime villain should be an enforeceable rule

You're going to end up making me like you at the rate you're going

[Servant Caster]

She doesn't have a guilty on me, and if I'm right in my guess about what she does actually know, I'm pretty sure I could clear it up just by claiming.

I'm just too stubborn to care enough about the way she's approaching me to give her the satisfaction.

go jump in a lake.

[Servant Moon Cancer]

*shrug*

Don't blame your inability to find scum on me, thanks.

[Servant Foreigner]

Okay. Because I got some attribute info when I was elected and was very concerned until I looked up stuff on the wiki. I'll let this play out but

no E-1

until everyone's had a chance to check in and I decide who I'm handing out a bonus to, can post reads, etc.

1) I don't need the bonus

2) I also have attribute info of some sort

[Servant Berserker]

In other words, I'm watching, but I don't know whether beserker should stick her neck out for this ultimatum or not.

At this point I don't care if they die. They know nothing about my role. I've been trying to disguise what I am literally all day to ensure their claim can't be tainted.

But at this point, it's obstanace for the sake of itself.

[Servant Moon Cancer]

Also the fact that I could just claim to clear up the entire mess should tell you how weak her "guilty" actually is.

Yet people are treating it like a guilty.

But apparently I'm the one playing badly, haha.

[Servant Assassin]

Okay. Because I got some attribute info when I was elected and was very concerned until I looked up stuff on the wiki. I'll let this play out but

no E-1

until everyone's had a chance to check in and I decide who I'm handing out a bonus to, can post reads, etc.

1) I don't need the bonus

2) I also have attribute info of some sort

I'm aware, your predecessor told us as much. Thanks for staying consistent, though.