Mini Theme 2162: Wherewolf [Game over | Village win]

Almost50 · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:24 am

WLC >> WLC = WLC >>>>> WLC is my preference

Almost50 · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:26 am

Btw, I think this is what has been expressed so far (sorry if I missed something as I quick skimmed just now)

A50 -> WLC
Fuzzy -> Italian
skies -> Fuzzy
WLC -> Fuzzy
Inso -> ?
Pine -> ?
Swift -> ?

brighteningskies · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:12 am

Thanks for summary of clairvoyant check votes.

And yeah of course it would be more helpful for the clairvoyant to have scum hunted instead of checking themselves but if they do find scum after we thought they were checking themselves then they have to come out and reveal themselves so him complaining like it's our fault that we pushed him to be checked is sus because obviously the clairvoyant would have to come out after we thought the check on them came back as corrupt but they supposedly got someone else. (Irrelevant because he's actually a wolf but I wanted to explain my earlier point)

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:01 am

what if the clairvoyant DID check themselves and got a corrupt result? what if the clairvoyant IS a wolf?

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:02 am

In post 526, Almost50 wrote:Btw, I think this is what has been expressed so far (sorry if I missed something as I quick skimmed just now)

A50 -> WLC
Fuzzy -> Italian
skies -> Fuzzy
WLC -> Fuzzy
Inso -> ?
Pine -> ?
Swift -> ?

i also said fuzzy but im fine with WLC too. i think we check one of them and then if the result is non-corrupt then we lunch the other.

brighteningskies · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:07 am

In post 528, Tayl0r Swift wrote:what if the clairvoyant DID check themselves and got a corrupt result? what if the clairvoyant IS a wolf?

What?? I don't understand what you're on about. The clairvoyant can't be a wolf so anyone corrupt is just a wolf.

Anyway I have voted and ticked that I am ready to move on.

Almost50 · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:13 am

In post 529, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also said fuzzy but im fine with WLC too. i think we check one of them and then if the result is non-corrupt then we lunch the other.

That is inconclusive

brighteningskies · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:20 am

I'm kinda inclined to suggest we check Tayl0r soon. Idk she doesn't seem to want to act in towns best interests!

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:33 am

In post 531, Almost50 wrote:
In post 529, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also said fuzzy but im fine with WLC too. i think we check one of them and then if the result is non-corrupt then we lunch the other.
That is inconclusive

im not saying we leave it up to the clairvoyant. im saying we decide collectively, and then tomorrow if theres an inno result, then we lunch the other person.

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:42 am

In post 533, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 531, Almost50 wrote:
In post 529, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also said fuzzy but im fine with WLC too. i think we check one of them and then if the result is non-corrupt then we lunch the other.
That is inconclusive
im not saying we leave it up to the clairvoyant. im saying we decide collectively, and then tomorrow if theres an inno result,
then we lunch the other person
.

please lunch me.....I will have a fajita plate w extra cheese and guacamole

Almost50 · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:43 am

I meant you didn't conclusively decide on WLC/Fuzzy. Do you vote for WLC or Fuzzy?

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:43 am

earlier in the day i said fuzzy but i now think WLC is better

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:44 am

In post 534, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:
In post 533, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 531, Almost50 wrote:
In post 529, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also said fuzzy but im fine with WLC too. i think we check one of them and then if the result is non-corrupt then we lunch the other.
That is inconclusive
im not saying we leave it up to the clairvoyant. im saying we decide collectively, and then tomorrow if theres an inno result,
then we lunch the other person
.

please lunch me.....I will have a fajita plate w extra cheese and guacamole

today we are lunching glitch

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:48 am

I am actually been thinking that WLc or Taylor would be good choices

I think we should cop WLC as I trust A50 choices . Glitch interaaction/ reactions to Taylor kind of makes me curious about her though. I need to reread Taylors poats.

TheFuzzylogic99 · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:52 am

@Taylor
apperently my wonderful humor is wasted on you.....either that or I am just a bad comedian. I prefer to believe the former...even if it is s delusion

WeyounsLastClone · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:36 am

With the last page, I trust Taylor a bit less and Fuzzy a bit more, but I guess that feels a little bit opportunistic in the current situation.
I already said yesterday that I'm okay to be checked, so if the majority feels that's the way to go that should be our play, but would feel like a waste to me. Taylor, Fuzzy, are you okay to be checked as well?

brighteningskies · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:48 am

In post 533, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 531, Almost50 wrote:
In post 529, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also said fuzzy but im fine with WLC too. i think we check one of them and then if the result is non-corrupt then we lunch the other.
That is inconclusive
im not saying we leave it up to the clairvoyant. im saying we decide collectively, and then tomorrow if theres an inno result, then we lunch the other person.

Not sure if you're typing lunch on purpose because of the site changes? but either way "lynch" is a word people are trying not to use just to let you know.

Also you're saying we burn one of either Fuzzy or WLC depending on who we actually check?? Not sure how I feel about that, we might wanna put pressure on one of them sure but not move straight to elimination.

ALSO will people please stop saying a check on them is a waste.. Surely you can understand why it looks scummy to say that and the only check that is genuinely a waste is checking me because you won't be able to tell if I'm a wolf or not from the check since it will be a Corrupt result either way.

brighteningskies · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 am

Also sure, let's ask the clairvoyant to check WLC then.

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:09 am

In post 541, brighteningskies wrote:
In post 533, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 531, Almost50 wrote:
In post 529, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i also said fuzzy but im fine with WLC too. i think we check one of them and then if the result is non-corrupt then we lunch the other.
That is inconclusive
im not saying we leave it up to the clairvoyant. im saying we decide collectively, and then tomorrow if theres an inno result, then we lunch the other person.
Not sure if you're typing lunch on purpose because of the site changes? but either way "lynch" is a word people are trying not to use just to let you know.

Also you're saying we burn one of either Fuzzy or WLC depending on who we actually check?? Not sure how I feel about that, we might wanna put pressure on one of them sure but not move straight to elimination.

ALSO will people please stop saying a check on them is a waste.. Surely you can understand why it looks scummy to say that and the only check that is genuinely a waste is checking me because you won't be able to tell if I'm a wolf or not from the check since it will be a Corrupt result either way.

lunch is a safe word that no one should have qualms about. you eat lunch during the day, and sometimes it results in death. it conveniently starts with L so L-1, lylo, etc still all work.

also i loled at the "no one is allowed to say that getting checked is a waste except me"

i dont mind being checked, but FMPOV its a waste.

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:09 am

actually if people suspect me then id like to be checked.

Glitch · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:48 am

In post 543, Tayl0r Swift wrote:lunch is a safe word that no one should have qualms about. you eat lunch during the day, and sometimes it results in death. it conveniently starts with L so L-1, lylo, etc still all work.

This is genius and will be my new word from now on, especially when scum is called wolves. Ha

brighteningskies · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:04 am

Fair enough, thought it was a typo. I didn't say no one else is allowed to say it just that it makes zero sense

Pine · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2020 8:45 am

I’m ethically opposed to collectively dictating what PRs should so.

On with the elimination.

Glitch · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:20 am

In post 547, Pine wrote:I’m ethically opposed to collectively dictating what PRs should so.

On with the elimination.

This tells me Pine must be the Clairvoyant or some sort of town PR.

Your daily dose of WIFOM is enjoyably sponsored by me!

Pine · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:21 am

Well I

am

mystically good at this, I suppose.