do you wanna talk about this? didn't you earlier say that's probably +town (1113)? what's changing your mind?In post 1306, Chara wrote:your dismissal of Tanner scum has me a little bit frowny face, Prism. i think those are good reasons to suspect him.
you're not wrong, though i did want to discuss it with you. (also talked about it in 1349 just now)In post 1311, Chara wrote:the Puppy vote is also where my interest is re: Tanner and i don't think Tanner has discussed it in response to prompting yet, though i could be wrong.
i still don't quite get what was this supposed to mean and/or imply? like... your only vote today was suji. not sure if i'm missing something in your description there, but is that not also pretty obvious/straightforward?In post 1190, Tanner wrote:also... not sure what you're implying by my puppy vote being obvious/straightforward? like, is that supposed to be a bad thing?
zzz lavender is still ignoring me, but my annoyance is probably NAI for them
i'm pointing it out because i did correctly call scum out like that once - a lurker-lhf slot that i was calling out day one, but nobody listened to me except 1-2 very towny players. we ended up kinda deadline-consolidating on executing a different scum. on day two, i pushed the lurker-lhf slot through because "if we were on-course to execute scum on day one, why didn't scum bother to jump on this lhf!townie and make me look bad tomorrow?" got a scumflip on day two as well.In post 1328, Chara wrote:i don't have a satisfying answer to this. i am instead quoting this post for further study postgame once all alignments are known, because i think it's interesting and maybe, finally, i could learn something about mafia theory.In post 1241, Tanner wrote:the only thing that's genuinely bugging me at this point (since i'm gonna pretend i trust hectic's read there for the time being) is why *didn't* scum try to get lhf!town!lavender? especially since if Not Chara were to hardpush her through, they could do so without consequence. like, from my pov, the only two people to ever actually vote there were two town. was hectic really that convincing with that read?
the only difference i think is that... well, there wasn't a hectic in that game who was defending them. which is what's giving me pause, since scum could've been afraid of him. which is why i'm still debating with myself about actually pushing lavender through, especially since i'd be signing my own death warrant if they flipped green, and i don't fancy us getting two green flips for the price of one, because of my own reads no less.
i read through 1341 while following 610, and damn. realizing how surface-level most of my reads are this game. "scum!pooky is good at pushing misexecutes, we probably don't get a scumflip on day one." 521 and 543 are kinda weird to be s/s i guess?
hello can i help with thatIn post 1344, Prism wrote:And maybe with a bit more time I can actually lock Pooky/Tanner as town