let me check myself on Gamma. I'm going to ignore most early game content b/c I think its irrelevant
Naked vote on Echo in
82.
158 explains that the Echo vote was a pressure vote. Adds more to it in
201.
adds fuel to the Ico fire in
159 and then votes in
162 after Alch.
246 gets off Ico and says he thinks that echo "town slipped"
265 revotes Ico
285 starts the cakes push/slight OMGUS
462 triggers me b/c
In post 462, Gamma Emerald wrote:And like, I’ve refused to talk about some of the points you’ve brought against me because I felt like they weren’t actually bad points.
it reminds me of how scum Gamma has reacted to me in the past.
495 tris vote
In hindsight his Ico vote seemed like a place holder vote and he pretty much fence sits on him.
Wich is confusing b/c he basicly calls him scum
In post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:so I don’t think becoming more active in response to pressure here is particularly Town-indicative. I think you probably took your vote off too early.
then kinda goes "oh you are active, so prob not scum."
In post 458, Gamma Emerald wrote:I mostly just didn’t want to let you get off easy. Looks like your contributions are consistent so
If Gamma felt like him becoming active wasn't Town-indicative AND his his evidence is a game in wich Ico posted it up to become the 2nd highest poster why does he unvote Ico wants Ico became active?
I don't feel like his Cake push had any merit to it.
So his sum total is a pressure vote on Echo that he now thinks is town. A place holdery type vote on Ico and a faulty (IMO) push on Cakes. And a random useless vote on Tris. So yeah, his content seems bad and I don't feel like he's doing anything worthwile.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit