In post 1213, davesaz wrote: In post 1133, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 1123, Starbuck wrote:Would you say the same thing about Titus? She did a 20 person reads list, too. I don't see you going as hard at her as you are at Iec.
Obviously my original statement about how valuable those lists are still stands, but Titus at least has been somewhat active in the thread, Iecerint popped in with a sparse bit of catch up and then posted that list.
I can't remember if I commented that my reading of Iecerint's catch up was that he seemed to spend a lot more time on reading than others were giving credit for.
I watched that catchup in real time and noticed that he was head down on the catchup and failing to notice my replies on material later than the catchup point. That implies a much higher degree of attention being spent than a quick read.
@Gamma - I don't think you're being very fair to Iec here and discrediting him in favor of boosting Titus. If you read Iec's ISO, he has 16 posts of catch up before he drops his list. That's not as sparse as you are misrepping it to be. Titus hastily threw together a list only when prodded, as she said, by my 967. Iec did his on his own list (without being asked) and even explained his mindset going when queried in
744. It's interesting that you're focusing/discrediting Iec, but not giving any attention to Titus on this.
In all actuality, I didn't expect Titus to drop a full list and to have a read on every person in the game (save for one or two replacements). I'm not quite sure how anyone has that put together, but Iec's explanation in 744 lets me know that he put thought and time into his catch up and his reads list, where Titus seemingly didn't.
@dave - I noticed the same thing, which is why the attacks on Iec, without any look towards Titus, bother me.
<3 Kise, Reck, dram, tans, & Kats <3
