In post 2021, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Can I just refer to Drew goof and ice as the axis of evil?
No.
Why not call yourselves the Axis of Good?In post 1975, davesaz wrote:Timestamp of IKS's claim Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:00:09 pmIn post 1947, Gamma Emerald wrote:Where was the claim in this sequence
After my vote, about 20-30 minutes before NPOM's vote.
Just to comment on this, I hammered IKS around 6 am Eastern (my forum time is set at UTC-5 if you need that info) about 3 hours before deadline. Typically, I'm up closer to 9 because I don't have to be to work until 10, but I have a senior 15 y/o dog who goes out at all hours. It happened to work out, when I laid back down after taking him out, that I remembered to check the thread before I fell back asleep. All of the previous will probably be taken as TMI or WIFOM, but I felt it was important to point out that I actually voted around 6 am and not 9 am.In post 1915, davesaz wrote:The reason to look at Starbuck would be to investigate the idea of a hammer for town cred. Someone made a reference to getting up early being unlikely for scum who could let it go for a no-shred. It's 6am from my timezone but that's 9am for Eastern US and late in the day for Europe. I think it's a big conclusion jump to think getting up early has anything to do with it unless you know a particular player's timezone. At E-1 at deadline, writing is on the wall and it's a tradeoff between the pain of hammering vs. not being sure if anyone knows or will figure out you ran out the clock. I don't think we can rule out a bus here. On the flip side, it's a pretty towny move.
To be fair, it's still not proven if NPOM is scum or not. So you might be eating these words.In post 1959, Looker wrote:I voted scum way before Starbuck, but I'm the hindrance
That was really odd. Typically, one or the other would have been pushing the opposite one. Not both of them pushing for someone else entirely.In post 1977, Iecerint wrote:I think both of them being scum ACCOUNTS FOR the wagon on you (e.g., IKS and NPOM voted for you and tried to get others to vote for you).In post 1962, pisskop wrote:I think its unlikely that both were scum. Where does that leave scum before the wagon on me?In post 1956, Iecerint wrote:VOTE: NPOM
This vote is based on my case D1, plus similar behavior from him today (e.g., not scumhunting, making irrelevant comments, trying to get others off-track). I think his behavior is best explained by a scum wincon. He does not behave this way in his games in general. Pisskop's wagon having been an anternawagon on such flimsy grounds supports this.
Generating a lot of content doesn't automatically mean that you're pro-town. Just as generating little content doesn't automatically mean that you're scum. It's what you do with that content. If Looker and Lavender were actually adding authentic thought to the thread, I wouldn't consider them hindrances. On the opposite, flooding the thread is something that can be considered scum indicative (take a look at Auro in Mafia of Revelations).In post 1987, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Because I am generating a lot of content which is obviously protown but they are insisting that I am scummy and not considering town me. Plus they were on my wagon.
In post 1996, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:caught for the wrong reason scum?
I'll take Famous Quotes by 45 for $200, Alex.In post 2002, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm pretty sure I'm trusted by the majority
As the guy who spent time trying to take focus off NPOM from the start of Day 1, I wouldn't put it past you to be continuing with that with this weird Lavender policy push.In post 2005, a2rudeboy wrote:orrr.... do you want to take some attention off of your scumpartner.
The Axis of Awesome exists.In post 2029, BrightEyedFish wrote:Why not call yourselves the Axis of Good?In post 1975, davesaz wrote:Timestamp of IKS's claim Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:00:09 pmIn post 1947, Gamma Emerald wrote:Where was the claim in this sequence
After my vote, about 20-30 minutes before NPOM's vote.
I’ve voted TWICE this day phaseIn post 2024, chkflip wrote:Gamma and Tiph don't give a FUCK where their vote goes, eh?
Fascinating.
Just noticed this when Starbuck responded to it, I already referenced an offsite scumgame where I was conveniently not around at times where my vote would have likely or definitely put my buddy over the edge, the best cover for not hammering is having random interferences in your scheduleIn post 1915, davesaz wrote:The reason to look at Starbuck would be to investigate the idea of a hammer for town cred. Someone made a reference to getting up early being unlikely for scum who could let it go for a no-shred. It's 6am from my timezone but that's 9am for Eastern US and late in the day for Europe. I think it's a big conclusion jump to think getting up early has anything to do with it unless you know a particular player's timezone. At E-1 at deadline, writing is on the wall and it's a tradeoff between the pain of hammering vs. not being sure if anyone knows or will figure out you ran out the clock. I don't think we can rule out a bus here. On the flip side, it's a pretty towny move.
Then who's the scum? Who are you voting for?In post 2014, Bambi Jay wrote:Wait are we actually saying we wagoned 2 scum day 1? I don't believe it much.
If he tells you someone, will you vote them? Who do you think is scum?In post 2019, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Then who do you believe is a better option than npom?In post 2014, Bambi Jay wrote:Wait are we actually saying we wagoned 2 scum day 1? I don't believe it much.
It was on a Thursday.In post 2030, BrightEyedFish wrote:The quote on my last post is irrelevant to my post.
I think you're right, I must have c/p that timestamp from the deadline.In post 2034, Starbuck wrote:Unless you're referencing the deadline time?
Though often they are one and the same.In post 2039, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Big difference between scummy behavior and annoying behavior.
No, Looker.In post 2041, Looker wrote:Then who's the scum? Who are you voting for?In post 2014, Bambi Jay wrote:Wait are we actually saying we wagoned 2 scum day 1? I don't believe it much.If he tells you someone, will you vote them? Who do you think is scum?In post 2019, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Then who do you believe is a better option than npom?In post 2014, Bambi Jay wrote:Wait are we actually saying we wagoned 2 scum day 1? I don't believe it much.It was on a Thursday.In post 2030, BrightEyedFish wrote:The quote on my last post is irrelevant to my post.
- Pisskop and Doctor Drew agreed in their PT to use the word "poopoo" as much as possible.
- "Content". Now give me a vote.
- Doctor Drew and Pisskop have been caught. What they are, I have no idea; but they're something.
- Starbuck's words don't really help me. I don't attack her play because I'm an adult, but yeah, I don't see what use she is. Maybe she thinks she's actually finding patterns in this place - whatever makes her happy in this game people play to kill time.
Wait, what? Where did personal shots come into this? Take that energy and put it toward generating content and contributing.In post 2041, Looker wrote:Starbuck's words don't really help me. I don't attack her play because I'm an adult, but yeah, I don't see what use she is. Maybe she thinks she's actually finding patterns in this place - whatever makes her happy in this game people play to kill time.
Not alignment indicative at all.In post 2043, davesaz wrote:Though often they are one and the same.In post 2039, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Big difference between scummy behavior and annoying behavior.