In post 2549, duppin wrote: In post 2546, Battle Mage wrote:did you want to do a final readslist beforehand? - if you flip town and I'm around tomorrow, I commit to giving it due consideration.
no not really, not because i dont want to but more so because my reads would really depend on how this goes down. As stated above if I get mislynched due to a player refusing to present an actual case and instead going with a meta read that another player has already proven is wrong, then it does not seem reasonable to me that town would be swayed by it (well if they do then that's really poor of them), id reckon it is more likely scum would.
i understand there is some slight bias in that but i think the logic is relatively easy to understand though. if a player already has a town read on me it does not make sense for them to do a 180 on me because a player says he has meta read that is easy to verify, would you not agree? hence why I think it is questionable of you to not present a case if you are town and really believe i am scum
I think it's safe to assume you've got what you're gonna get - I don't see why you would postpone giving reads based on the justification above. Claiming I've gone with a bad meta read on you is factually inaccurate, as
I haven't even given a meta read
. It's a poor misrep, but I'm not gonna make a fuss about it. I think you just picked up something Norweg said, and either misunderstood and ran with it when I couldn't be bothered to call you out, or you're deliberately re-writing history.
townblocking is good though man - if you can get a few town ppl, like maybe me, Noraa, Taylor aligned, we could do some good in this world. unlikely with noraa, but i'm always open to try.
And I really believe in my heart, you are scum.