you... really don't like Nahdia being busy with RL?In post 1924, DiamondSentinel wrote:I really don't like the hard lurk yesterday.
Or what?
you... really don't like Nahdia being busy with RL?In post 1924, DiamondSentinel wrote:I really don't like the hard lurk yesterday.
We don't need to talk.In post 1923, Cabd wrote:If, and only if, the dethy calibrated on me, please let me know as I need to talk about things I'd rather not.
what do you not like and whyIn post 1924, DiamondSentinel wrote:I'm not liking the little bit I've seen today
My opinion on out-of-game stuff is whatever because people can lie or exaggerate. I will always treat all lurking as the same.In post 1925, Something_Smart wrote:you... really don't like Nahdia being busy with RL?In post 1924, DiamondSentinel wrote:I really don't like the hard lurk yesterday.
Or what?
Also, this feels pretty out-of-touch with reality. In my experience, very few people believe that it's ethical to lie about RL as scum to excuse alignment-indicative lurking.In post 1928, DiamondSentinel wrote:My opinion on out-of-game stuff is whatever because people can lie or exaggerate.
no, im not.In post 1932, DiamondSentinel wrote:they're being deliberately evasive/prodgy
why is the content not goodIn post 1928, DiamondSentinel wrote:But it's not just the lurking, it's also that the content today is not good.
In post 1002, Nahdia wrote:Certainly not.In post 1000, midwaybear wrote:Nahdia doesn't seem like the type of person to intentionally do traditionally scummy stuff to get townread as scum.
These 2 quotes read horribly. Talking about ones town game (or how to make a "town" post) is in my experience essentially universally a scum trait. It's really the strongest tell I can see.In post 1012, Nahdia wrote:you think I... didn't believe it?In post 1011, midwaybear wrote:I'm not sure if you really believed in Tammy being self conscious, but now I see my man Diamond also making similar accusations so idk
I latched onto the initial post I pointed out (the one which replied was just a joke) because that's 100% out of my own scum playbook. The kind of post I basically would never make as town but am pretty sure I have in fact made as scum. That doesn't mean it's the same for Tammy, but in my own self-reflection I find I make that kind of post because when I'm worried about how to make a town post, the obvious (too-obvious, therefore has to be presented as a joke) solution is to literally copy the post of a town player. So I started looking for more evidence of that kind of self-consciousness and found the things I pointed out from there.
Half-heartedly calling shade on a group without hitting on it at all later. Really hate this.In post 1155, Nahdia wrote:there's a reasonable chance at least one of the 2012 circlejerk is scum and im hoping they just sort themselves out so i dont have to
This entire back and forth with peta looks awful for both, but 100000% worse on Nahdia than peta. I'm not unconvinced it's scum theater.In post 1189, Nahdia wrote:not to be rude but i don't need your permission to respond to posts in this threadIn post 1181, petapan wrote:not to be rude i don't need you backing me up in this argument and i dunno why it needs your comment over anything elseIn post 1179, Nahdia wrote:feels a little big brain to me. i can see the logic as to why maybe town shouldn't, but i dont agree it means townwouldn'tdo it.
Potentially misrepping how traitors work, normally?In post 1905, Nahdia wrote:he defends taylor, then wont elaborate, then just questions her without any followup, and never actually votes.In post 1901, petapan wrote:i thought the opposite but i'm willing to hear you outIn post 1897, Nahdia wrote:his EoD looks bad to me.In post 1895, petapan wrote:feels legitIn post 1883, Nahdia wrote:more words, man!In post 1879, petapan wrote:i'll call pooky town too even though that's one more townread than i need.
VOTE: pookythemagicalbear
oh my brain blocked that from my memory. but then it's only necessarily AI if he was sure she was the traitor? which, given signalling, maybe.In post 1905, Nahdia wrote:he defends taylor, then wont elaborate, then just questions her without any followup, and never actually votes.
maybe, but i dont even agreed that it's only AI if scum!pooky is certain she's a traitor. it's waffly either way.In post 1940, petapan wrote:oh my brain blocked that from my memory. but then it's only necessarily AI if he was sure she was the traitor? which, given signalling, maybe.In post 1905, Nahdia wrote:he defends taylor, then wont elaborate, then just questions her without any followup, and never actually votes.
We shall be known as the Ya-Ya sisterhood of the traveling pants in memory of our dearly departed.In post 1861, Cabd wrote:three man masonry