yeah it's super weird!In post 2172, Alisae wrote:RED FLAGIn post 2170, Tammy wrote:him claiming nahdia hadn't made enough posts to be read by yesterday when I asked, but today his case is based on Nadia's posts from yesterday as if they're a smoking gun.
RED FLAG
why is bulge town again? I feel like he's avoiding posting in this gameIn post 2174, Tammy wrote:I wish bulge's only real game posts weren't on verifying dethy stuff.
I super appreciated the more methodical way he approached the outing yesterday, but I'd like to see something more that just verifying that what we've said is agreed upon by all of us.
oh ok gniteIn post 2175, Tammy wrote:yeah it's super weird!In post 2172, Alisae wrote:RED FLAGIn post 2170, Tammy wrote:him claiming nahdia hadn't made enough posts to be read by yesterday when I asked, but today his case is based on Nadia's posts from yesterday as if they're a smoking gun.
RED FLAG
I should probably let myself pass out here soon if I want to be a productive member of societygrade shittomorrow
yep so which world are we living in is the questionIn post 2176, Alisae wrote:actually tbf
it COULD be possible that because he just had no other reads so when he needed to find another scumread he did read nahdia's d2 posts, thought they were scummy, then opened up the ISO to try to find things to prove his read.
I don't think the lieing about real world stuff bits are turthful at allIn post 2180, Tammy wrote:yep so which world are we living in is the questionIn post 2176, Alisae wrote:actually tbf
it COULD be possible that because he just had no other reads so when he needed to find another scumread he did read nahdia's d2 posts, thought they were scummy, then opened up the ISO to try to find things to prove his read.
Yesterday I was dead set on Jake because I swore he was the scum in the dethy.In post 2144, Tammy wrote:But it didn't bother you yesterday?In post 1924, DiamondSentinel wrote:VOTE: Nahdia
I'm not liking the little bit I've seen today, and Ireallydon't like the hard lurk yesterday. I need something to reassure me about this slot, and I'm not getting it.
I’ll get back to this later. Right now I’m doing some early morning catch-up on my phone.In post 2149, Tammy wrote:What don't you like about those posts?In post 1987, DiamondSentinel wrote:Hmm. Indeed, I don't care for those posts. I look at it in more depth in a bit, and I might be inclined to sheep you there.
what i'm getting from the meta dump is that a lot of the stuff i was taking as town indicative from him is in fact nullIn post 2160, Tammy wrote:I've had diamond as a lower tier townish read based on a few reactions and interactions with peta? and ffery? I think. However, I don't like the weird focus he had on me, ffery, cabd, and syry after midway bear asked about his read on us. If he's scum, he might have used a town's suggestion to focus there though he did branch out to the rest of the game. What I don't like today is how he's acting like nahdia is soooo super scummy. A) I don't like the suggestion that someone is lying about real life issues as it didn't seem like a lie and they can be scum regardless, but B) and this is more important yesterday I asked about his read on nahdia and he claimed there wasn't enough to go on but today he pulls up their posting from yesterday to make a case against them which just feels convenient
My only hesitation is that he has some weird beliefs in behavior and content so I'm not sure if we're in a world where diamond sentinel is just being his weird outtake self or if he's actually scum.
left aka not towards the postIn post 2094, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i can't tell which way your avatar is facing tho
the hair hides the eyes
No.In post 2095, Cabd wrote:Yes.In post 2092, SirCakez wrote:I don't understand what you're getting at here?
That's too farIn post 2098, Alisae wrote:ur not changing ur ur just flipping it so it faces the other wayIn post 2093, SirCakez wrote:I have not changed my avatar in five years on site
U guys have to deal with my wrong-facing ways
I feel like you know what I mean and are playing obtuseIn post 2101, Something_Smart wrote:This is uh not a very helpful answer. I'm playing the game. I can't NOT be playing the game, unless I, you know, replaced out.In post 2092, SirCakez wrote:Trying to play the game
what is this referring to?In post 2109, Alisae wrote:Taylor could have signalled to Cakez but this isn't something im super confident in?
In post 1239, Something_Smart wrote:Am I thoughIn post 1237, SirCakez wrote:Something_Smart is feeling a lot more absent than usual.
I will always hate self-meta posting. I also dislike that sort of coy dodging of the question for the first post.In post 1244, Something_Smart wrote:I think this is within normal range for how absent I am.
Dodging questions (although admittedly the last part isn't a huge deal to me. Dodging questions about meta aren't AI)In post 1419, Something_Smart wrote:noIn post 1417, Bell wrote:Do you have any reads yet?
there is way too much discussion that is orthogonal to anything I want to talk about.Sometimes.In post 1417, Bell wrote:Do you thread avoid as scum?
Not a big deal, but I'm just going down Cakez's list here.In post 1428, Something_Smart wrote:I mean, if I knew, I'd be talking about it :/In post 1423, Bell wrote:What would you like to talk about?
The meta discussions are alienating. People seem to be by and large going with the flow and not really doing anything that stands out. And like I'm sure there IS readable content in there but I don't have the skill nor the patience to extract it.
I hate this. Snarky and unhelpful posts are a sign of scum in a lot of situations I've found.In post 1493, Something_Smart wrote:FTFYIn post 1479, SirCakez wrote:"I'm town and don't want to effort"
This. Just... no. Absolutely not. Even if what's going on around you is complete bunk and not remotely helpful, you can still contribute. This is a sign of a scum that is looking for any excuse they have to avoid the game.In post 1494, Something_Smart wrote:Specifically, I don't want to effort when I know it won't accomplish anything worthwhile.
See above. Even if your reads are trash, you make them so that you haveIn post 1520, Something_Smart wrote:Because when I force reads they come out hot garbage. Speaking from experience.In post 1496, SirCakez wrote:How can you assume this
This was posted 1500 posts in. There was more than enough to engage with.In post 1527, Something_Smart wrote:Ideally no. I just need to find something to engage with.In post 1525, fferyllt wrote:Are you thinking to kinda sit out day 1?
If there's anything you want to hear my opinion on, I'll definitely try to see what I can come up with (though I can't guarantee it won't be "that's NAI").
You know what?In post 2104, fferyllt wrote:If you can explain what Tayl0rs launch into space does for the solving urgency of your hood without major negative utility I'd like to hear that, but I can live.In post 2099, Cabd wrote:I can, but it will have MAJOR negative utility if done so.In post 2096, fferyllt wrote:Discuss, please.In post 2087, Cabd wrote:It would have been if Taylor's launch into space hadn't been the imposter.In post 2084, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:is it time for us to solve your hood too?In post 2081, Cabd wrote:I uh... I think there might not be that many more hoods, given the lack of response to you so far, ffery.
Are you okay with that?
Just know that I'm getting uncomfortable about ~stuff~.
We caught that you were a miller, but eventually thought you were crumbing loverizer instead of neighborizer. I thought there might be something reflexive in your ability.In post 2191, Cabd wrote:You know what?In post 2104, fferyllt wrote:If you can explain what Tayl0rs launch into space does for the solving urgency of your hood without major negative utility I'd like to hear that, but I can live.In post 2099, Cabd wrote:I can, but it will have MAJOR negative utility if done so.In post 2096, fferyllt wrote:Discuss, please.In post 2087, Cabd wrote:It would have been if Taylor's launch into space hadn't been the imposter.In post 2084, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:is it time for us to solve your hood too?In post 2081, Cabd wrote:I uh... I think there might not be that many more hoods, given the lack of response to you so far, ffery.
Are you okay with that?
Just know that I'm getting uncomfortable about ~stuff~.
I don't want us to have to live in a universe where we game solve today while you distrust me.
I'm just gonna put out what I've got.
I'm a miller that compulsive neighborize-millerizes. I pick my target at day's start. I REALLY hoped your masonry picked up on the day one attempts to convey this to you and syr. That's why I didn't want you checking me or my ilk at first. That said, knowing there's a miller in the game, well, two of them, anyways, now.. That means the deathy can calibrate and come into day three with sanity mostly solved.
One could argue that outing the dethy day 1 was suboptimal, but Tayl0r's in-game play was not something we could let continue.In post 2194, Cabd wrote:This is probably sub optimal play, but having 5 clears out of 15 alive is better than 3 clears out of 15 alive for you.
If this is the case, why didn't I avoid the game after saying it?In post 2190, DiamondSentinel wrote:This is a sign of a scum that is looking for any excuse they have to avoid the game.