In post 323, Titus wrote:I see there's intent to hammer even if someone said not to. So it's claim time.
I am the doctor.
What do you mean?In post 324, Trendall wrote:I've not played this setup before, so I guess that if somebody has drawn either Jailkeeper, Friendly Neighbour or Mason, they know that that's not true.
That's because mine are in good faith and not rehearsed.In post 325, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 323, Titus wrote:I see there's intent to hammer even if someone said not to. So it's claim time.
I am the doctor.If you are thedoctor, then NorwegianboyEE is thescum. Now the question is,who is telleing the TRUTH??
Also, I find your arguments weak in compare to NorwegianboyEE's arguments.
Oh, I get it. Yeah, anyone even hinting at a power role will definitely be targetted at night.In post 328, Trendall wrote:Well the only possible setups with a doctor include either a tracker or a cop. So if a townsided person right now is any other town-sided power role (not a vanilla townie), then they know for definite that Titus must be mafia because they can't be in a setup with a doctor at the same time.
I dunno if they should claim or not though, like someone else knows that or can figure that out, I'm terrible at strategy.
In post 332, Zurel wrote:Oh, I get it. Yeah, anyone even hinting at a power role will definitely be targetted at night.In post 328, Trendall wrote:Well the only possible setups with a doctor include either a tracker or a cop. So if a townsided person right now is any other town-sided power role (not a vanilla townie), then they know for definite that Titus must be mafia because they can't be in a setup with a doctor at the same time.
I dunno if they should claim or not though, like someone else knows that or can figure that out, I'm terrible at strategy.
If Titus is scum, it's certainly advantageous of her that Wiyvern isn't around. This buys her more time. And how willing is everyone to risk lynching the town doctor? But she's also not saying much anymore, like she has given up trying to convince us.
Try to convince me. I'm gullible.
Norway has continued to be defensive and paint every response as bad. There's no substance to his posts. He townreads everyone who agrees with him. His scumreads, minus me, are just those who haven't posted.In post 176, Titus wrote:I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.In post 165, Zurel wrote:Well, all right then.
Actually Titus, can you explain why did you scumread Norway? I can't follow the reasoning, sorry.
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.
I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)
Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.
In post 331, Titus wrote:That's because mine are in good faith and not rehearsed.In post 325, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 323, Titus wrote:I see there's intent to hammer even if someone said not to. So it's claim time.
I am the doctor.If you are thedoctor, then NorwegianboyEE is thescum. Now the question is,who is telleing the TRUTH??
Also, I find your arguments weak in compare to NorwegianboyEE's arguments.
VLA today. It's Saturday and I normally play DnD with my friends. I may pop on intermittently.
What occurs to me is if you're a mafia being lynched at this point, then a good thing to do is to claim a power role in the hope that some other actual power role counterclaims and you've found out who a good person to kill at night would be.In post 332, Zurel wrote: Oh, I get it. Yeah, anyone even hinting at a power role will definitely be targetted at night.
If Titus is scum, it's certainly advantageous of her that Wiyvern isn't around. This buys her more time. And how willing is everyone to risk lynching the town doctor? But she's also not saying much anymore, like she has given up trying to convince us.
Try to convince me. I'm gullible.
Claiming before getting executed is a common move for town. Instead of getting misexecuted, I get shot. Thus saving our execution for scum. It's quite a common thing to do as TL will say even if NorwegianboyEE won't.In post 337, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 331, Titus wrote:That's because mine are in good faith and not rehearsed.In post 325, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 323, Titus wrote:I see there's intent to hammer even if someone said not to. So it's claim time.
I am the doctor.If you are thedoctor, then NorwegianboyEE is thescum. Now the question is,who is telleing the TRUTH??
Also, I find your arguments weak in compare to NorwegianboyEE's arguments.
VLA today. It's Saturday and I normally play DnD with my friends. I may pop on intermittently.What! It's not making any sense! Are you telling us for believing you only for your words (good faith!!)?? With such an important role, claming on day 1 is either a naive (but you're a SE) move or a scummy (you're lying) move
In post 336, Zurel wrote:I'm not sure if we are even on the same page, Salsabil...
In post 332, Zurel wrote:Oh, I get it. Yeah, anyone even hinting at a power role will definitely be targetted at night.In post 328, Trendall wrote:Well the only possible setups with a doctor include either a tracker or a cop. So if a townsided person right now is any other town-sided power role (not a vanilla townie), then they know for definite that Titus must be mafia because they can't be in a setup with a doctor at the same time.
I dunno if they should claim or not though, like someone else knows that or can figure that out, I'm terrible at strategy.
If Titus is scum, it's certainly advantageous of her that Wiyvern isn't around. This buys her more time. And how willing is everyone to risk lynching the town doctor? But she's also not saying much anymore, like she has given up trying to convince us.
Try to convince me. I'm gullible.
In post 334, Titus wrote:Norway has continued to be defensive and paint every response as bad. There's no substance to his posts. He townreads everyone who agrees with him. His scumreads, minus me, are just those who haven't posted.In post 176, Titus wrote:I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.In post 165, Zurel wrote:Well, all right then.
Actually Titus, can you explain why did you scumread Norway? I can't follow the reasoning, sorry.
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.
I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)
Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.
He has zero desire to sort out if he's being buddied or not because he doesn't have to as scum. Notice the totak lack of paranoia at how fast I get run up.
This is either a) scum wagoning a threat or b) a revenge wagon for me fooling him before. I strongly think a due to a lack of sorting or really discussing the motivations of anyone else.
How willing are you to risk lynching the doctor?In post 340, Trendall wrote:If they are actual doctor then it is fine to claim there, like standard, yeah.
If I survive the night, most setups would have a way of proving I was scum (I am not), so the proper scum move is to try and lynch me today.In post 345, Zurel wrote:How willing are you to risk lynching the doctor?In post 340, Trendall wrote:If they are actual doctor then it is fine to claim there, like standard, yeah.
Also, let's say Titus survives the day and she doesn't get killed this night. Does it mean she can be said to be almost 100% scum?
In post 343, Titus wrote:In post 334, Titus wrote:Norway has continued to be defensive and paint every response as bad. There's no substance to his posts. He townreads everyone who agrees with him. His scumreads, minus me, are just those who haven't posted.In post 176, Titus wrote:I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.In post 165, Zurel wrote:Well, all right then.
Actually Titus, can you explain why did you scumread Norway? I can't follow the reasoning, sorry.
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.
I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)
Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.
He has zero desire to sort out if he's being buddied or not because he doesn't have to as scum. Notice the totak lack of paranoia at how fast I get run up.
This is either a) scum wagoning a threat or b) a revenge wagon for me fooling him before. I strongly think a due to a lack of sorting or really discussing the motivations of anyone else.
Would it matter at all the fact that I just creamed him as scum so he has a revenge motive to lie?In post 344, Trendall wrote:You might have to come at it from a different angle then because I don't agree with any part of your argument about NorwegianboyEE
Exactly. He's too neat. He's too confident. Real town have flaws and errors. I am human. I have to analyze.In post 347, Salsabil Faria wrote:In post 343, Titus wrote:In post 334, Titus wrote:Norway has continued to be defensive and paint every response as bad. There's no substance to his posts. He townreads everyone who agrees with him. His scumreads, minus me, are just those who haven't posted.In post 176, Titus wrote:I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.In post 165, Zurel wrote:Well, all right then.
Actually Titus, can you explain why did you scumread Norway? I can't follow the reasoning, sorry.
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.
I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)
Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.
He has zero desire to sort out if he's being buddied or not because he doesn't have to as scum. Notice the totak lack of paranoia at how fast I get run up.
This is either a) scum wagoning a threat or b) a revenge wagon for me fooling him before. I strongly think a due to a lack of sorting or really discussing the motivations of anyone else.yeah, it's true that NorwegianboyEE is pushing everyone here to lynch you. Like, he is 100% sure that you're a scum, which is also weird!
)