Smoke-Filled Antechamber [Endgame]

[SirCakez]

There haven’t been that many times I’ve seen town make a catch-up post like that. The format itself whether it’s by player or page automatically pings me. It’s made worse when there are so many unnecessary comments or comments that don’t add anything, which makes it look like padding.

yeah it reeks of catchups I used to make as scum. it's not really helpful but it looks good on the surface.

[Bell]

Is that a lot tho. You already got pushed on this and I don’t wanna retread old ground. But you’re mischaracterizing your initial reaction and your subsequent apporach, imo.

[fferyllt]

Bell, roughly what percentage of your posts are phoneposts?

[SirCakez]

Is that a lot tho. You already got pushed on this and I don’t wanna retread old ground. But you’re mischaracterizing your initial reaction and your subsequent apporach, imo.

yeah it's not as much or quite what I remembered. but I still dislike it for the reasons in that post.

[DiamondSentinel]

I don't have solid answers on anything. I just have gutreads that I go based off of and then try to scrap together weak justification to convince others that it isn't just a gutread.

but you specifically called me out as someone you can read well!!!!! why!? explain yourself!

Because my gut reads are pretty accurate, especially against you. See: Soccer Spirits. (And before you point it out, yes, I was scum, but it was multiball)

[DiamondSentinel]

PEdit: Absolutely. Just because you disagree with someone's reads does not mean that they are not legit. Legitimate reads are reads that are working towards solving the game, not sowing discord. There are many people I've had disagreeing reads with historically that I also did not for a second doubt were town, and they truly meant those reads (and there are a fair few people who's said the same thing)

Wait, you're getting me confused. What's the differences between

Merit

,

Normalize

, and

Legit

?

Functionally? Very little.
To normalize a set of reads (or a stance) would just be to grant that it is legitimate and has merit.
Merit is that it's not complete bullshit and is worth discussing.
Legitimacy is that it is meant to solve the game and not sow dissent.

was really hoping DS would give a better answer on my question about his meta on me. as it stands it was basically a dodge.

Nahdia isn't here rn, be my scheherazade~

hello hello.
bulge's content this game:

Spoiler:

• votes DS for his anger at RVS being a bit performative. i did take note of that as well!
  
• i kinda liked 1122 for some reason. it's bold.
  
• starts asking lots of mech questions to clarify the dethy traitor thing. personally i find mechspeccing to be where a scum thrives, but i cant deny the town perspective here. he's asking questions that scum would obviously already know the answer to.
  
• his early d2 is pretty defensive, though not necessarily in a bad way? it feels strange to me that bulge would be surprised to be in PoEs in a way that i almost wanna say is towny.
  
• gets much more into sorting territory by 2679. i like this post and the posts that follow. the continual followup on questions he's asked makes the sorting look genuine.
  
• i feel 2806 deep in my soul

bulge feels towny to me.

I don't have solid answers on anything. I just have gutreads that I go based off of and then try to scrap together weak justification to convince others that it isn't just a gutread.

It feels like there's a disconnect between these two posts. The first one suggests a structure and method. The second one suggests the opposite. When I read the first one, I made a mental note that I wanted to see if your iso suggests a fair amount of method in your playstyle.

If you think I have methodology, then my acting has been a resounding success.

[DiamondSentinel]

Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

[Gamma Emerald]

I'd def be down to kill Gamma.
not sure about bulge tho, I kinda like his recent content

You still need to answer the thing I asked you

[Gamma Emerald]

Bell who is scummy

Good Q.

I’m struggling with narratives and counter narratives for each player RN tbh. I feel like I could make a reasonable case for any of the remaining unclaimed players to be scum at this point, but I’m not sure how accurate I would be. There are more players saying odd things than there are players that could be scum in this game. Do you want me to write them out for you tomorrow?

What are you generally looking for rn?

[fferyllt]

Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

[midwaybear]

Can you wrap words around these two reads?

I haven't seen much to make me reconsider the read on Nahdia, but Gamma's style of posting was pretty weird to me and somewhat disconnected. Could be nothing, but I'm not as comfortable anymore.

[fferyllt]

Cabd, petapan: thoughts about trying gth?

[DiamondSentinel]

Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

My point in the first one.

[fferyllt]

Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

My point in the first one.

Wordz it please.

[Cabd]

Cabd, petapan: thoughts about trying gth?

Gamestate too topheavy. Something for day four or so

[DiamondSentinel]

Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

My point in the first one.

Wordz it please.

There's a difference between an actual read and what people accept as genuine.

[fferyllt]

Also, as a side note, it means that you're proving my first point (the two aren't contradictory by any means). Makes me chuckle there.

Your first point being?

My point in the first one.

Wordz it please.

There's a difference between an actual read and what people accept as genuine.

How did I prove that point?

[Gamma Emerald]

-Gamma keeps referencing some "signalling" Taylor did with me as reason to vote me and is not actually pointing to anything specific

I kinda lost some faith in that read upon doing my own homework tbh
like I think it could still be valid but I'm not sure

[Something_Smart]

If you think I have methodology, then my acting has been a resounding success.

How do you define methodology such that you do not have one

[Alisae]

@Diamond

- Give me a read on bulge with some explanation as to why you have that read thanks

I don't have a read on them. I barely even remember them in this game.

what do you mean you don’t have a read on them go get one

[Alisae]

I'd def be down to kill Gamma.
not sure about bulge tho, I kinda like his recent content

You still need to answer the thing I asked you

Dude at least try to form reads on the other people that are posting like wtf?

[Gamma Emerald]

I have formed reads, what are you on mate

[Alisae]

I read your name as diamondsentinel my bad

[Alisae]

And I was talking to him not sure how your post got quoted but quick reply is somewhat buggy

[Gamma Emerald]

oh

still though, I don't think you've answered me yet