Musician Mafia: Guitarists GAME OVER

[DrippingGoofball]

Ebwop

Has NO clear sense

[BrightEyedFish]

IKS had outed the scum team flavor.

I don't remember, what team flavor did he out?

[Starbuck]

Y'all were a buncha chatty cathy's on the overnight! I dig it!

Placeholder with this and I'll be back.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

The IKS was anomalous in one respect.

It must gave immediately obvious, and perhaps even alarming, to scum that IKS had outed the scum team flavor.

It may not have been so cut and dry from a townie perspective. Each townie sees only their own flavor, and has to clear sense of the overall flavor of the town.

The "developer" could have been town.

The scum could have been drummers, roadies, fans...

Scum on that wagon would be VERY SURE that IKS' flavor did not fit, and probably bus'ed hard after the claim.

so your theory is that IKS didn't discuss his fake-claim with his scumbuddies in their PT.

and they then ganged him like a ravenous group of sharks as soon as he fake-claimed their flavor?

That's kind of wild.

[chkflip]

What do you mean by "only not on town?"

and
What do you mean by "Only not on scum"?

Those were the names that were only not on either the town elimination or the scum elimination, respectively. Meaning there were people that were on one but not the other. There were also people that were not on both.

[chkflip]

If it's still confusing:

On neither: Iecerint, DrippingGoofball, a2rudeboy

These players ended up on neither lynch by EoD 1 and 2.

Only not on scum: Lavender, Glaron, chkflip, Doctor Drew, Almost50

These players were not on the Siteflake wagon; however, they were on the Looker wagon.

Only not on town: BrightEyedFish, pisskop, TiphaineDeath, Walt!slot (it was empty tho)

These players were not on the Looker wagon; however, they were on the Siteflake wagon.

[Almost50]

What do you mean by "only not on town?"

What do you mean by "only not on town?"

and
What do you mean by "Only not on scum"?

And what do you mean by "Not on either"?

[Almost50]

I mean, seriously.. aren't those self-explanatory?

[Almost50]

I feel like we're ALL running out of productive questions and are fumbling for what to say to keep us from getting prodded (I apologize to the minority who may actually have had something to say)

[NoPowerOverMe]

They could have been labled better.

Voted iks:

Voted looker:

Voted neither:

Would have been less confusing.

[NoPowerOverMe]

I think a large number of players are unwilling to listen to others or change their mindset.

[chkflip]

They could have been labled better.

Voted iks:

Voted looker:

Voted neither:

Would have been less confusing.

True! Was right before I called it a night, but I've reworded it above so hopefully that's more clear.

[Almost50]

The scum could have been drummers, roadies, fans...

I have selected 21 guitarists that have made an impact in my life through one way or another. - The Baker (from post #0 in the signups thread).

Come again?

[chkflip]

Reading is fucking difficult, 50, okay!?

It's tough calling one person baselessly scum.

Like

So tough

[NoPowerOverMe]

This is partly why I believe deaths failure to claim shredder is important. It's an easy oversight/mistake but it's one of several potentially scummy things that add up.

[chkflip]

I'll hammer if I absolutely have to but we've still got a lot of phase left. You lot think there's information to be gleaned from those EoD VCs?

[Almost50]

@chk: Yeah, I'm starting to get the feeling DGB isn't even thinking about her posts.. but rather posting to keep the appearance. Too bad her wagon is of only one vote, cuz that's where I'd have voted if it was a competing wagon.

@NPOM: I am of two minds here. I agree it "could" be an indication (now that you put it that way) but I also am not sure it is. Sometimes we all claim what we perceive our riles to be and not the exact wording on the PM (God knows I do/did that a lot, and even most recently)

[Almost50]

I'll hammer if I absolutely have to but we've still got a lot of phase left. You lot think there's information to be gleaned from those EoD VCs?

Same here. Not voting for the time being, but will if I have to (i.e. towards the end of the day)

[chkflip]

Happily go back to DGB if it could gain a legitimate friction.

I'm VT mate, or I would have been fighting harder, fire away .

I'd like to see a more in-depth claim if I'm honest. Like Looker and Siteflake's claims.

[BrightEyedFish]

@chk: Yeah, I'm starting to get the feeling DGB isn't even thinking about her posts.. but rather posting to keep the appearance. Too bad her wagon is of only one vote, cuz that's where I'd have voted if it was a competing wagon.

@NPOM: I am of two minds here. I agree it "could" be an indication (now that you put it that way) but I also am not sure it is. Sometimes we all claim what we perceive our riles to be and not the exact wording on the PM (God knows I do/did that a lot, and even most recently)

Not chk but a DGB wagon does interest me.

[BrightEyedFish]

VOTE: DGB

[Almost50]

I'm just trying to figure who is making more sense in their cases. It seems that every case on the table was built on a big chunk of personal speculation rather than solid facts. I mean, yes.. they do use facts to build their cases, but the conclusion isn't necessarily the one they derive from it. (English sucks! Does anyone speak Arabic around here??)

P-edit: Happy to build the momentum on this one

[Almost50]

Opps! Forgot to attach a vote

VOTE: DGB

[Lavender]

I’m in unbearable pain
I’m going to going to read properly in a bit

[NoPowerOverMe]

DGB is looking increasingly scummy. Looking at her iso it looks like she talks to the whole player base at large rather than specific people and is not game solving.

VOTE: DGB