Why is DS at the bottom for you???In post 3302, Cabd wrote:In most death order...In post 3301, petapan wrote:gamma vote >> bell vote for me atp but i will not shut up about killing bulge while i am still allowed to post
{Bulge}
gap
{gamma, bell}
gap
{???}
HUUUGE GAP
{DS}
?
How am I not arguing in good faith? It's pretty clear that something is very fucky around here. No set-up makes over half of their town mod-confirmed, and I really don't understand how nobody sees that.In post 3321, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hell yeah something's wrong, DS demonstrated he's not trying to argue in good faith, he's just interested in the points that best suit his agenda. I have solid evidence that what DS did is a scum move, that I gathered around the last time I used this tell, which was actually a couple years ago I believe.In post 3276, fferyllt wrote:I was trying to put words around the implications of DS's scumread of Cabd, to show him how absurd it sounded.
DS adopted the absurdities wholeheartedly, which was bizarre enough.
And here, you're scumreading him for buying into the implications, rather than sticking with the initial raw take.
Something's wrong here.
I was summarizing petapan's reads back to him for clarification.In post 3325, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is DS at the bottom for you???In post 3302, Cabd wrote:In most death order...In post 3301, petapan wrote:gamma vote >> bell vote for me atp but i will not shut up about killing bulge while i am still allowed to post
{Bulge}
gap
{gamma, bell}
gap
{???}
HUUUGE GAP
{DS}
?
Do you not see how DS was scummily angling to try and set the stage the push you by trying to discredit the very reason you are conftown?
I think he’s trying to see where peta’s head is at.In post 3325, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is DS at the bottom for you???In post 3302, Cabd wrote:In most death order...In post 3301, petapan wrote:gamma vote >> bell vote for me atp but i will not shut up about killing bulge while i am still allowed to post
{Bulge}
gap
{gamma, bell}
gap
{???}
HUUUGE GAP
{DS}
?
Do you not see how DS was scummily angling to try and set the stage the push you by trying to discredit the very reason you are conftown?
VOTE: The BulgeIn post 3329, petapan wrote:hey gamma if you're still townreading me vote the goddamn bulge
It seemed like he forgot to put me in his readlist not that he didn't have a read. I typically don't engage with people about their reads on me unless it's a weirdly strong scumread. Bell seems to lightly scumread me, so I don't really care to engage there.In post 3314, The Bulge wrote:can you talk to me again about why didn't care about bell's lack of a read on you, despite the fact that he interacted with you by far more than anyone else day 1?
what about it seems "genuine" to you, why can't i be bad faith pushing you as scumIn post 3319, The Bulge wrote:I will concede that peta's more recent posts do seem more genuine if a little misguided. happy to have a fan
pedit - sry to disappoint. I admit the wording could have been a little less leading.
how is it not?In post 3308, Gamma Emerald wrote:That makes a little more sense but I still don't really find it scummy.In post 3271, SirCakez wrote:I meant how he was accused of using OMGUS to find scum reads and just went "yeah"In post 3249, Gamma Emerald wrote:How has he “acknowledged making up reads”? And even if he did, I don’t think how he did it was scummy.In post 3218, SirCakez wrote:if people are wondering why I'm suddenly so aggressive on Bell it's because I find his posting over the last few pages obscenely scummy
his attitude seems so fake and his acknowledgement of basically making up reads also reeks
im busy dude I don't have time to respond to big-ass posts where nobody cares what I'd say anywaysIn post 3312, The Bulge wrote:lol cakez where's your spineIn post 3272, SirCakez wrote:I can go through Bulge's big attack post on me this page but honestly it seems kind of pointless because I don't think he's gonna change his mind on this particular interaction.
Well why can't we wait for nightkills to deal with all of this? I do think this might be an issue, but not an issue that needs to be resolved today.In post 3326, DiamondSentinel wrote:No set-up makes over half of their town mod-confirmed, and I really don't understand how nobody sees that.
I was referring to what I said earlier. I didn't see anything before aside from you following your own trajectory on what you hoped would be an easy push. now I'm seeing evidence that you do believe I am scum and more importantly that you think others should be seeing it as well. compared to before where I had no evidence. it could very well still be a bad-faith scum push but I'm more inclined towards cakez and ds at this point and I don't think the whole scumteam is breathing down my neck rnIn post 3266, The Bulge wrote:petapan's motives are a mystery to me, but his push on me doesn't feel any kind of genuine. very much need to iso.
Bell mingled with the usual suspects as is expected, but most of his discussion and theorizing d1 was directed at you iircIn post 3334, midwaybear wrote:I don't really remember Bell engaging with me particularly more than anyone else D1. I thought he was over at the 2012-2013 people with all of them hard scumreading him.
what gives you that impression? before you said you wouldn't be able to changeIn post 3336, SirCakez wrote:nobody cares what I'd say anyways
If someone is dropping their own points to push the points someone else brought up instead, they essentially are saying through their actions, "I don't genuinely believe what I'm saying, I just want to push whatever gets everyone to think I'm right". Supplementing one's argument with points brought on by another player is okay, opting to push someone else's points in place of your own is not.In post 3339, Tammy wrote:Gamma - can you please explain that scumtell a little more?
well i think you know what i want you to do
do you have any actual scumreads? You say I'm only neutral but still list me as one of your most preferred votes, so if your scumpool isn't super shallow (this is just an extension of the metaphor, not me assailing your reads), why are you preferring to vote a neutral read over/alongside an actual scumread?
are you seeing anyone else ask me to respond to your post?In post 3342, The Bulge wrote:what gives you that impression? before you said you wouldn't be able to changeIn post 3336, SirCakez wrote:nobody cares what I'd say anywaysmymind by responding, no mention of the onlookers.
