Newbie 2037 - Game Over


Forum rules
Rockhopper
Rockhopper
Goon
Rockhopper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 597
Joined: June 17, 2019

Post Post #100 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:30 am

Post by Rockhopper »

In post 99, MiniMegabyte wrote:
In post 96, Rockhopper wrote:I think padwag is scummier but I'll do bak for now.

VOTE: bakslash
That's E-2
Also why did you make this vote? If you think someone else is scummier why not vote them instead of putting someone else at E-2?
I'm curious to see his response/reaction
User avatar
Micc
Micc
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Micc
He/Him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7408
Joined: October 1, 2013
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: At Home

Post Post #101 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:02 am

Post by Micc »

Votecount 1.02
bakslash (3) -
padwag, ItalianoVD, Rockhopper
ItalianoVD (2) -
MiniMegabyte, Billy Pilgrim
Norfolk Boy1 (1) -
Facebones

Not Voting (3) -
Bakslash, Norfolk Boy1, Dunnstral

With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to eliminate.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2020-10-30 12:15:00).
"To hide a tree, use a forest" -Ninja Boy Hideo
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2701
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #102 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:57 am

Post by ItalianoVD »

In post 94, Rockhopper wrote:VOTE: padwag
In post 96, Rockhopper wrote:I think padwag is scummier but I'll do bak for now.

VOTE: bakslash
That's E-2
Why do you think Padwag is scummy? And like Mini said, if you think he’s scummier, why wouldn’t you vote for him?
User avatar
Norfolk Boy1
Norfolk Boy1
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Norfolk Boy1
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: August 31, 2020
Location: Norfolk, but not that one.

Post Post #103 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:59 am

Post by Norfolk Boy1 »

In post 100, Rockhopper wrote: I'm curious to see his response/reaction
You've prefaced it as being a temporary vote, I don't see you getting much from that.

I don't see an issue with putting him at E-2 (I played a game here where someone was E-2 within 20 posts) but be firm with it.
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2701
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #104 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:00 am

Post by ItalianoVD »

In post 27, Rockhopper wrote:
In post 21, padwag wrote:I am testing reactions
this post actually gives off town vibes to me tbh, i can elaborate on this if someone wants (ps im not really good at articulation
What changed?
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2701
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #105 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:01 am

Post by ItalianoVD »

In post 92, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:
In post 77, ItalianoVD wrote:quote]I read a game where you were scum with Redados. Did you ever look at any of the town players ideas, scenarios, and hypotheticals and say “hey that’s smart, I should/could do that.
Yeah - it's clear I did, particularly in the scum PT for that game. I subbed in on night 2, so it was easier, but my main tactic for the last dayphase in particular was to manipulate Fredrick's philosophy of 'no helpful posts = scum' into him joining a wagon with me.
And where did that get you?
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2701
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #106 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:12 am

Post by ItalianoVD »

Just to throw it out there, I feels like something is off with Billy’s posts. Give me a moment to break it down. I’ll give an analysis of why I think so.
Rockhopper
Rockhopper
Goon
Rockhopper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 597
Joined: June 17, 2019

Post Post #107 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:17 am

Post by Rockhopper »

In post 102, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 94, Rockhopper wrote:VOTE: padwag
In post 96, Rockhopper wrote:I think padwag is scummier but I'll do bak for now.

VOTE: bakslash
That's E-2
Why do you think Padwag is scummy? And like Mini said, if you think he’s scummier, why wouldn’t you vote for him?
Like I said in , I don't like his read on Billy.
I feel like being on the bak wagon is the better move ATM.

In post 104, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 27, Rockhopper wrote:
In post 21, padwag wrote:I am testing reactions
this post actually gives off town vibes to me tbh, i can elaborate on this if someone wants (ps im not really good at articulation
What changed?
Well, my initial read was based on just a single post, so it was as weak as it could get :P
It followed a bunch of wrong premises so it doesn't mean anything anymore.
User avatar
Facebones
Facebones
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Facebones
Goon
Goon
Posts: 431
Joined: October 17, 2020
Location: Vic, Australia

Post Post #108 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:48 am

Post by Facebones »

In post 93, Rockhopper wrote: By constantly checking if a play is more likely a result from that mindset than a townie mindset, I guess?
For example padwag
and bakslash
have both hit high notes, I'll talk about that.
You proceed to talk about and vote for padwag, completely ignoring bakslash. Then Italiano comes in and votes for bakslash and 25 minutes later you jump on board
In post 96, Rockhopper wrote:I think padwag is scummier but I'll do bak for now.

VOTE: bakslash
That's E-2
Mini asks you why, and you say
In post 100, Rockhopper wrote: I'm curious to see his response/reaction
which is a bit of a nothing answer.

Could you please expand more on post 93? More specifically, what high notes has bakslash apparently hit? The lack of content isn't enough to give me a strong read one way or the other and I'm curious as to what I'm missing
Rockhopper
Rockhopper
Goon
Rockhopper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 597
Joined: June 17, 2019

Post Post #109 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:00 am

Post by Rockhopper »

In post 108, Facebones wrote:
In post 93, Rockhopper wrote: By constantly checking if a play is more likely a result from that mindset than a townie mindset, I guess?
For example padwag
and bakslash
have both hit high notes, I'll talk about that.
You proceed to talk about and vote for padwag, completely ignoring bakslash. Then Italiano comes in and votes for bakslash and 25 minutes later you jump on board
In post 96, Rockhopper wrote:I think padwag is scummier but I'll do bak for now.

VOTE: bakslash
That's E-2
Mini asks you why, and you say
In post 100, Rockhopper wrote: I'm curious to see his response/reaction
which is a bit of a nothing answer.
My bad, I should have elaborated earlier.
I feel like it's much more stressful to be at E-2 than at E-4, and as a result I expect scum to handle the situation differently (best case).
Else, if I'm satisfied, I'll just go back to putting pressure on padwag instead (that can wait).

Could you please expand more on post 93? More specifically, what high notes has bakslash apparently hit? The lack of content isn't enough to give me a strong read one way or the other and I'm curious as to what I'm missing
I have nothing more to add actually. I just find it scummy that he questioned pad's vote on him but ignored Mini's and Billy's votes.
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2701
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #110 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:28 am

Post by ItalianoVD »

Billy RVS votes Dunnstral, which is fine. Votes padwag in for voting RVS. Kinda unfair imo, but then flips it in , which I’m guessing pulled us/him out of RVS. I asked him what was on his mind regarding this in (more on that later)

If padwag was RVS voting and claimed to be testing reactions (which is the purpose of RVS) seems like Billy should have just let it go. RVS votes don’t always need an explanation before placing it down.

Not sure what he was expecting to get in . Looks to be asking just to ask. is similar where it doesn’t seem that padwag’s answer(s) would give him anything of substance. and follow the same theme.

is just unfair, given that Billy voted for someone who hadn’t posted yet (Dunnstral)

I also feel Billy is trying to pocket (get them on his side) possible newbie townies in and .

In the back of my mind Billy is scum and will probably and ultimately be my final vote of the day, but we have time for more interactions and activity.
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2701
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #111 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:29 am

Post by ItalianoVD »

In post 86, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
In post 60, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 22, Billy Pilgrim wrote:VOTE: padwag
In post 23, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Actually no, this was worse

VOTE: bakslash
Not sure where your head is on this? RVS? Serious?
I dont understand the question. I dont approach these games as though there's some magical point where the game shifts from RVS to serious. Theres a wiki thread I think that talks about the early game as the Low Information stage. I like to think of it that way.
Okay? Not sure why you don’t understand. I was asking if these votes were RVS votes or serious ones? I assumed your bakslash one was based on the wording, but I just wanted to make sure. My bad if I didn’t make it clear.
In post 86, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I started with my role and alignment, and I voted randomly. When I made those votes, I had a page of content and most folks had popped into the thread. So I picked the opening that I felt was the most scummy and voted it. I thought padwag's vote was fine,
but the answer to the question was weird.
How was it weird? Isn’t that what RVS’ purpose is? Reactions?
In post 86, Billy Pilgrim wrote:But then I realized that bakslash hadnt posted already. Their first post in the game was literally to quote padwag's naked vote and put a question mark. Didn't engage with any of the content that was there, just put a weird question out.
That’s all fine. Thank you.
User avatar
Norfolk Boy1
Norfolk Boy1
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Norfolk Boy1
Goon
Goon
Posts: 295
Joined: August 31, 2020
Location: Norfolk, but not that one.

Post Post #112 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:45 am

Post by Norfolk Boy1 »

In post 105, ItalianoVD wrote:And where did that get you?
Haha, I was the runner up in that game.
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2701
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #113 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:47 am

Post by ItalianoVD »

In post 107, Rockhopper wrote:
In post 102, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 94, Rockhopper wrote:VOTE: padwag
In post 96, Rockhopper wrote:I think padwag is scummier but I'll do bak for now.

VOTE: bakslash
That's E-2
Why do you think Padwag is scummy? And like Mini said, if you think he’s scummier, why wouldn’t you vote for him?
Like I said in , I don't like his read on Billy.
I feel like being on the bak wagon is the better move ATM.
And I’m guessing you townread Billy? Still don’t know why that’s a thing: not voting for your highest scumread. :facepalm: And it just seems like you’re taking an opportunity to get a wagon closer to elimination. You slightly mentioned bakslash, but never scumread him, so it just seems like opportunism at the moment.
In post 104, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 27, Rockhopper wrote:
In post 21, padwag wrote:I am testing reactions
this post actually gives off town vibes to me tbh, i can elaborate on this if someone wants (ps im not really good at articulation
What changed?
In post 107, Rockhopper wrote:Well, my initial read was based on just a single post, so it was as weak as it could get :P
It followed a bunch of wrong premises so it doesn't mean anything anymore.
I have a problem with your current read on padwag given there is/was no content to make you change. If he did something you townread him for, why are you now scumreading him for doing the same thing? And I disagree, I think it does mean something, but you brushing it off isn’t gonna make me go away.
Rockhopper
Rockhopper
Goon
Rockhopper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 597
Joined: June 17, 2019

Post Post #114 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:12 am

Post by Rockhopper »

In post 113, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 107, Rockhopper wrote:
In post 102, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 94, Rockhopper wrote:VOTE: padwag
In post 96, Rockhopper wrote:I think padwag is scummier but I'll do bak for now.

VOTE: bakslash
That's E-2
Why do you think Padwag is scummy? And like Mini said, if you think he’s scummier, why wouldn’t you vote for him?
Like I said in , I don't like his read on Billy.
I feel like being on the bak wagon is the better move ATM.
And I’m guessing you townread Billy? Still don’t know why that’s a thing: not voting for your highest scumread. :facepalm: And it just seems like you’re taking an opportunity to get a wagon closer to elimination. You slightly mentioned bakslash, but never scumread him, so it just seems like opportunism at the moment.
I don't have a read on Billy yet, but I'll take a look at your arguments.
But isn't it strange that he only chose to question the vote on him, and not Mini's or Billy's?
The defensive nature kinda points to the survival aspect of a scum mindset, IMO.
This part was WRT bakslash, I did have a scumread on him.

In post 104, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 27, Rockhopper wrote:
In post 21, padwag wrote:I am testing reactions
this post actually gives off town vibes to me tbh, i can elaborate on this if someone wants (ps im not really good at articulation
What changed?
In post 107, Rockhopper wrote:Well, my initial read was based on just a single post, so it was as weak as it could get :P
It followed a bunch of wrong premises so it doesn't mean anything anymore.
I have a problem with your current read on padwag given there is/was no content to make you change. If he did something you townread him for, why are you now scumreading him for doing the same thing? And I disagree, I think it does mean something, but you brushing it off isn’t gonna make me go away.
Fine, but know that I realized it was an incorrect line of thought.
When padwag posted , I assumed he had no knowledge of RVS, in which case it would have been bold to throw out a vote to avoid unwanted consequences (- scum). I would've expected scum padwag to blatantly point to RVS (seeing this was the reason for a previous vote) as an attempt to blend in, which didn't happen. Therefore slight town...

My recent scumread on him is based off of different premises.
padwag
padwag
Townie
padwag
Townie
Townie
Posts: 30
Joined: January 25, 2020
Location: Earth

Post Post #115 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:31 am

Post by padwag »

In post 69, MiniMegabyte wrote:Padwag any chance you could please set an avatar? Just makes it easier to identify your posts
I don't really know how.
User avatar
Bakslash
Bakslash
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Bakslash
Townie
Townie
Posts: 30
Joined: October 14, 2020

Post Post #116 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:50 am

Post by Bakslash »

The reason I haven't talked much is because I'm new and I don't know how to contribute to a conversation too much since I'm not familiar with the website. I understand the bandwagon on me and I'm posting this to defend myself.
User avatar
Bakslash
Bakslash
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Bakslash
Townie
Townie
Posts: 30
Joined: October 14, 2020

Post Post #117 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:50 am

Post by Bakslash »

The reason I haven't talked much is because I'm new and I don't know how to contribute to a conversation too much since I'm not familiar with the website. I understand the bandwagon on me and I'm posting this to defend myself.
User avatar
Bakslash
Bakslash
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Bakslash
Townie
Townie
Posts: 30
Joined: October 14, 2020

Post Post #118 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:54 am

Post by Bakslash »

My bad for posting twice
padwag
padwag
Townie
padwag
Townie
Townie
Posts: 30
Joined: January 25, 2020
Location: Earth

Post Post #119 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 10:19 am

Post by padwag »

In post 80, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
In post 21, padwag wrote:I am testing reactions
What did you make of the reactions?
I like the way rockhopper is thinking in Post 93. To me, it feels like it was written from a townie perspective. I also find it interesting that italiano chose to join me on the lynch, but I wont know what that would mean unless one of them flips.
padwag
padwag
Townie
padwag
Townie
Townie
Posts: 30
Joined: January 25, 2020
Location: Earth

Post Post #120 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 10:23 am

Post by padwag »

Bakslash, what are your thoughts on the game so far?
User avatar
Bakslash
Bakslash
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Bakslash
Townie
Townie
Posts: 30
Joined: October 14, 2020

Post Post #121 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 10:43 am

Post by Bakslash »

In post 120, padwag wrote:Bakslash, what are your thoughts on the game so far?
Well we're still on Day 1 so I don't think there is that much to say.
User avatar
MiniMegabyte
MiniMegabyte
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MiniMegabyte
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1339
Joined: June 23, 2020
Location: Queensland, Australia

Post Post #122 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:55 pm

Post by MiniMegabyte »

In post 107, Rockhopper wrote:Like I said in 93, I don't like his read on Billy
Why exactly?
User avatar
MiniMegabyte
MiniMegabyte
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
MiniMegabyte
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1339
Joined: June 23, 2020
Location: Queensland, Australia

Post Post #123 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:00 pm

Post by MiniMegabyte »

In post 115, padwag wrote:
In post 69, MiniMegabyte wrote:Padwag any chance you could please set an avatar? Just makes it easier to identify your posts
I don't really know how.
Up the top left of the screen next to the private messages there is “user control panel”. Click on that and then click on the tab that says profile and scroll down until you see edit avatar.


Let me know if you need me to explain clearer :]
User avatar
Billy Pilgrim
Billy Pilgrim
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Billy Pilgrim
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2418
Joined: July 24, 2019

Post Post #124 (ISO) » Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:05 pm

Post by Billy Pilgrim »

In post 90, Facebones wrote:
In post 79, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
In post 26, Facebones wrote:
ItalianoVD wrote:Non answers get scumread.
Smooth. It seems like you're pretty experienced at manipulating people to do what you want them to do?




Can you explain the first part here?
It was said purely tongue in cheek
This isn't the part I was referring to. I was referring to the part where you said you didn't want to get scumread so you would answer. Can you please explain that?
Locked