To answer the third one -- I actually feel like, outside of our mutual tunnel, we'd been approaching the game relatively similarly? While I hadn't really liked your reads earlier in the game, as things went on and we gained more information, I felt like I could understand your perspective a little more. I would say the biggest thing here by far is how you were treating Lavender. I initially had thought it was kinda scummy the way you were emphasizing her as town since it seemed like maybe white knighting, after alisae and nacho came in arguing she was scum I kinda realized it was maybe more townie to just establish baseline points than white knighty.In post 4235, Tanner wrote:does scum!krazy ever no-kill in order to open up the "endgame PoE"?
why? and who'd you clear as scum here?
also can you pls answer what your mindset was yesterday, why you were fine having nacho executed when pretty much your only scumread other than be just flipped green and i was the main pusher?
Beyond that I'm not sure I agree you were the main pusher on Hectic? Wasn't that more Pooky? In any case I didn't really think your approach to Hectic that day was scummy.
On the second one, I feel like as scum I'd probably clear Alisae and Lavender? I'm less sure on Lavender, but I really don't get why Alisae wasn't cleared given how consistently Prism was townread
For the first one, that's a kinda complicated question. The thing is, there's three related points here--no killing twice, clearing you, and how I view the game. In isolation, I suppose there are worlds where I would no kill if it offered some sort of clear and demonstrable strategic advantage. But the thing is, I hate playing scum, and I would want the game to be over as soon as possible. So for me to no kill there would have to be some sort of massive strategic advantage of doing so. In the context of this game... that does not seem to be the way it's played out. In a world of Krazy!Scum, I would be no killing to kill one of the clears, right? But... at least, going into day 3, I personally saw both Prism and Lavender as completely clear. So... I would be... no killing... to dismantle mechanical clears... while then also giving the game an extra free clear in you (Tanner) for the purpose of sacrificing a kill on one of the townread players? That's putting aside the simple fact that I hate scum... I don't see how no killing only to clear you would offer me~as scum~any strategic advantage whatsoever, particularly over the chance to kill another player instead. While I think scum no killing to play around the mechanical clears makes sense sort of abstractly, I don't see how it makes sense for me specifically at all.
I guess this is tricky since I wasn't really actively pushing you yesterday, but I feel like that is probably related to why scum cleared you, but not why *I as scum* would clear you. If I am no longer pushing you actively, and if you get the towncred of a clear, then I can see why scum would think you would push me and have more momentum because obviously I look really shitty for having pushed you so much this game. For me to be scum this game, I would have had to have done the thing I would almost never do this game (prolong the game)... only to then randomly waste it by innoing you? Like I don't want to insult scum, I think I kinda get what they're going for here, but I think if I was me thinking of me being scum I think I'd have to think I was a dumbass lol
