i wish i was scum i really do but im not and its going to suck for you guys tommorrowIn post 4397, Morning Tweet wrote:pooookyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
be scum and let yourself go downnnnnn
pleeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I don't know what I'm gonna do with myself if you're not scum
well, actually I do. But i kinda just want it to be you
its really not meIn post 4397, Morning Tweet wrote:pooookyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
be scum and let yourself go downnnnnn
pleeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I don't know what I'm gonna do with myself if you're not scum
well, actually I do. But i kinda just want it to be you
All I have to go off is you saying you would have carried Ele on your back and gotten Puppy spared :( and copious amounts of emotionIn post 4403, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:its really not meIn post 4397, Morning Tweet wrote:pooookyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
be scum and let yourself go downnnnnn
pleeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I don't know what I'm gonna do with myself if you're not scum
well, actually I do. But i kinda just want it to be you
"Will the average mafiascum player sacrifice their sanity and go on a genocidal killing spree in order to max out EV, or will love and understanding come before winning?"In post 4402, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:what if this is isis punishment upon us for not sparing
to make us chase a scum who doesnt exist.
for pursuing EV above love.
for not listening to Hectic.
Redtea literally didn't vote anyoneIn post 4405, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:redtea was literally not voting ele
compilation form:In post 4406, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:whats your best reason for why it cant be krazy?
concise form:In post 4355, Morning Tweet wrote:GENTLEMEN AND HERBS OF THE JURY
Evidence supporting Krazy is town:And double toss on Krazy's irritated reaction to Tanner suspecting him. I live and die by the principle that people are more likely to say mean things they might regret if they at least feel justified in doing so. Scum would not unless they really thought they were being caught for the wrong reasons.In post 4292, Morning Tweet wrote:also toss on Prism's redtea meta in like, 1581 and 2744 for exampleIn post 4192, Krazy wrote:but yeah, between the catboi kill, which was one of the only slots hard defending me, and the tanner clear, which seems to serve no purpose other than getting me fought today, I want to say basically every visible scum night action has either been to make my slot lynchable
Clap joins a three-deep wagon on me day 2 with the other scum already dead
like, I'm just town. I'm not actually sure who the last scum is, but I feel like if you think about what scum is trying to do this game you will realize that me getting fought is basically their top priority at this point since it's definitely necessary to them winning the gameIn post 3859, Morning Tweet wrote:I guess I take more of an opposite stance on this. I think Krazy wouldn't feel justified in being somewhat mean if he didnt feel like Tanner was genuinely trying to portray him poorly -- which implies that Krazy really is town that (somewhat emotionally in my opinion) believes Tanner is scum.In post 3851, Hectic wrote:I've been thinking about this Tanner push from Krazy, and I get this feeling that scum!Krazy would be a lot more okay with pushing this harsh/slightly mean angle than town!Krazy. As scum, it's all for the sake of the game and fabricated, so no hard feelings. As town, I feel like he's less likely to attack Tanner using this angle unless he's extremely confident, since he'd feel worse about it in case he's wrong. but I don't think the reasons for his push should equate to him being extremely confident? Tanner's start of day 3 wall was so towny, because it was stream of consciousness posting, and really hard to fake as scum, but Krazy continued pushing there regardless.
If Krazy is scum, then he knows Tanner is town who really does believe Krazy is overlooking what makes Tanner town (or whatever things might have upset him).
I suppose I just dont believe in fabricating being upset with someone and then justifying it because 'it's just for the sake of the game'. Not to say you can't do that, I just think itd be unfun and I'm willing to bet it happens far, far less often than the alternative. so all in all I feel town!Krazy would be much more likely to feel justified in getting angry than scum!Krazy would feel justified in feigning it.
No one was gonna entertain eliminating Tanner I don't think.In post 4410, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Tanner being spared is precisely why Krazy is MORE likely to be scum.
Krazy/Tanner suspect each other - if they are BOTH town, why wouldn't you put them both in the final elim pool to fight it out and move Prism/Tweet into Conf-Town?
In post 4411, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:*flops ears*
im gonna overload from of this ear flopping as of late (*ﾉωﾉ) !In post 4412, Alisae wrote:flops ears
(人☯﹏☯)In post 4416, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:btw I love you tweetie. I wouldn't even be upset if you were scum stringing me along. I really am good here and I am sincerely grateful for you giving me the time to defend myself <3.
In post 4418, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:that would be pretty amazing :3
it's happening rn if you're town!!PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:the last member of the cute animal alliance haha
Ah, okay. I think that I answered that in my other response, namely that I was basically re-evaluating both of your slots, and Nacho's reads seemed bad in a scummy way. Obviously anything I can say on that read doesn't mean much given he was town, but people like Prism had made some pretty decent points about why you were town. And idk man, felt kinda worn down.In post 4305, Tanner wrote:err, phrased that poorly, my bad. i meant "you had two scumreads, hectic and tanner. hectic flipped green. then the next day you had tanner leading the nacho wagon. why were you okay (4104) with that wagon going through?"
In post 4350, Alisae wrote:I just learned that we can’t no lynch :/