that is such a weird comment to make about skitter when almost all her posts are one-liners. there's literally only one of her posts that is 4+ sentences long.In post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:I wasn't really meaning super long ones. Just the paragraph ones, where it's more than a sentence.
looks to me like he threw out a surface-level offhand 'read' on skitter, then when someone pressed him on it, he just made up some BS and doubled down on it when pressed again.In post 304, Something_Smart wrote:Why is that weird thought more likely to come from scum than town?
that's where you're wrong!In post 303, Infinity 324 wrote:Hoopla, I'm pretty sure you're too good of a player to buy this reasoning.
This is in theory possible, but not what I was asking. It's possible that they made it up out of thin air; it's also possible that they misremembered skitter's posts as being longer than they were. If they did misremember, that's obviously not alignment indicative, so what makes you think it was a fabrication rather than an error?In post 309, Hoopla wrote:looks to me like he threw out a surface-level offhand 'read' on skitter, then when someone pressed him on it, he just made up some BS and doubled down on it when pressed again.
at first, i assumed it was probably an error and that jackson must have swapped me & skitter in his head. but he was explicitly asked that:In post 312, Something_Smart wrote:If they did misremember, that's obviously not alignment indicative, so what makes you think it was a fabrication rather than an error?
if it was an error, it would have been revealed then.In post 269, JacksonVirgo wrote:Nah I mean skitterIn post 263, Infinity 324 wrote: Do you mean hoopla? I get the feeling she's known as the setup speccer so it's kind of expected of her.
This could hold some weight behind it as JV did also forget about the time of Peta's unvote.In post 312, Something_Smart wrote:This is in theory possible, but not what I was asking. It's possible that they made it up out of thin air; it's also possible that they misremembered skitter's posts as being longer than they were. If they did misremember, that's obviously not alignment indicative, so what makes you think it was a fabrication rather than an error?In post 309, Hoopla wrote:looks to me like he threw out a surface-level offhand 'read' on skitter, then when someone pressed him on it, he just made up some BS and doubled down on it when pressed again.
What do you take from her not pointing it out?In post 307, Something_Smart wrote:Actually, probably more noteworthy is skitter's response to that read.She just took it in stride and told JV it was NAI instead of pointing out that she didn't have any long posts.
this is an aside, but you're one of thoseIn post 316, Something_Smart wrote:I don't know. It seems more unskitterly than anything else.
My instinct is to say that it's more likely scum looking to grab towncred by pointing out why she shouldn't be townread, but I don't know if skitter thinks like that.
My original reasoning of skitter was called out by skiiter themself which makes me think they're Town a lot more. I just realised that their posts look a lot smaller to those who don't have split windows (like a video to the right and the MS to the left).In post 297, Uncrowned wrote:So far JV's two reads have been myself and Skitter as town.
Would you mind elaborating on these a bit more JV?
You didn't give me cake, so you're insta scum I don't have to read you owoIn post 309, Hoopla wrote:looks to me like he threw out a surface-level offhand 'read' on skitter, then when someone pressed him on it, he just made up some BS and doubled down on it when pressed again.In post 304, Something_Smart wrote:Why is that weird thought more likely to come from scum than town?
i think if this was a genuine town observation, it's more likely for him to have had this thought about me (someone who has actually posted walls).
that's where you're wrong!In post 303, Infinity 324 wrote:Hoopla, I'm pretty sure you're too good of a player to buy this reasoning.
In what way?In post 276, Uncrowned wrote:If we're comparing Skitter to Peta (who you're voting) in terms of non-setup related discussion, they're pretty similar, no?
I dont have a sense for how long my posts are this gane in particular, and i get someone (wrongly) townreading me for something along those lines nearly every game i play. But post length/how many posts/efforting is nai for me, and i'm reasonably confident you (or someone else who knows me) would have complained if i *didnt* point that outIn post 307, Something_Smart wrote:Actually, probably more noteworthy is skitter's response to that read. She just took it in stride and told JV it was NAI instead of pointing out that she didn't have any long posts.
I point out it's nai as both alignmentsIn post 316, Something_Smart wrote:I don't know. It seems more unskitterly than anything else.
My instinct is to say that it's more likely scum looking to grab towncred by pointing out why she shouldn't be townread, but I don't know if skitter thinks like that.