In post 492, petapan wrote: In post 470, davesaz wrote: In post 467, petapan wrote: In post 466, davesaz wrote:Indirectly scumreading Hoopla but nowhere in this ISO is it made clear why Hoopla would be a scumread.
it's in his first post? "opportunistic wagon hopping". strong noob vibes.
Eh, fair enough. I'm used to much more though it is extremely early still.
I'm certain TGP has been in enough games to not be considered in that category. I'm just not sure I have a strong meta handle yet.
it's whatever category you want to put "person who gets concerned by early game wagon hopping"
here you go:
In post 237, Hoopla wrote:rats.
looks like i hitched my wagon to the wrong horse.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: lilith
In post 301, Hoopla wrote: In post 275, JacksonVirgo wrote:I wasn't really meaning super long ones. Just the paragraph ones, where it's more than a sentence.
that is such a weird comment to make about skitter when almost all her posts are one-liners. there's literally only one of her posts that is 4+ sentences long.
why pick out her?
especially when there --
*sorry, splitting up this post because it's getting pretty long.
1/2
In post 302, Hoopla wrote:2/2
continued:
especially when there are half a dozen other players who have posted with an amount of verbosity. not to mention me, who has actually posted a couple of walls.
i agree with peta. i simply don't buy this is genuine town thought.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: jacksonvirgo
here you go (there are no hoopla posts in between these by the way, they're adjacent in her ISO.
for context - she begins with an rvs vote on Lilith that leaves a bad taste in my mouth because while it could be harmless it also could be scum seeing if they can chain miseliminations. then a completely naked and seemingly random vote on penguin after a skitter-penguin interaction with no other context, followed by her next post being a. weird and opportunistic vote on Lilith after that wagon picks up. finally, with two sarcastic posts, she discredits and votes JV for something that really doesn't look that AI, picking up on a JV wagon forming. Yeah, this is opportunistic wagon hopping. Enough of it is NAI that Hoopla is a moderate scumlean as opposed to my PP scumread.
In post 381, Hoopla wrote: In post 358, Something_Smart wrote:...ish. I'm quite reserved with my vote, especially on day 1, but it has less to do with surety and more that I see early votes as causing more problems than they solve. Also I'm afraid of making decisions.
yes, we were. and i was shocked to discover it took you beyond page 50 to lay down your first vote.
i am fascinated by the stoic observers afraid to jump in the waters.
a handy tip: when in doubt, don't be afraid to sheep ol' hoopla.
this also felt weird to me. like, sheep hoopla on what? you've laid down a couple naked votes and another couple votes where you've basically sheeped other people.
