Up to this point the line of questioning is fairly town++ from A50, but this is where it turns the corner into reachingIn post 2861, Almost50 wrote:How does Mark seem toknowthere's scum between the two? And why did he vote gera himself if he thought one of the two was scum? And if it's a "new read" that he only developed on D2, then why is it not the same for me (or anyone else he put on that pool based on this bad reasoning)?? It's kinda hypocritical to claim "a group of people did this and I suspect them for it" when I myself have done the exact same thing at the exact same time frame.
Ofc I don't know who scum is and I certainly didn't think that exactly one of the two of dk or geraint were scum, which is what you seem to be implying.
At the time, I thought dk was scum and geraint was null. I hammered geraint because it was preferable to a No Elim with <24h left but I certainly didn't find the slot actively scummy in the way that you seemed to, so my vote on him was coming from a different place for a different reason. It just really feels like you are misrepping here to present your vote and mine from the same place
-- predit : 10ish posts in the time it takes me to respond to one. This is not going to end well lol