In post 155, Aristophanes wrote: In post 154, samantha97 wrote:aw I feel bad if that prompted him to do that cause it was rhetorical
unless we're doing a roundabout massclaim, what is the purpose of voting them instead of literally anyone else
VOTE: BrightEyedFish
For the record, we are NOT massclaiming D1.
Oh, I was asked about my thoughts on claims. One sec I'll take a look at them.
Tbh a negative utility massclaim might be advisable (basically just saying whether you are or are not a miller, ascetic, PGO, etc.)
In post 174, Endless Terror wrote: In post 164, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i haven't played with town ydrasse, so take this with an obvious grain of salt, but her opening posts in that game felt more to me like fluff posting with an attempt to appear town, but her posts were game related (see
121 in that game), where she's literally like "okay, real content" whereas her posts in this game are less serious. feels more like town to me here
i've skimmed the game pretty lightly. insane we're already at page 7. i'll try to catch up more tomorrow if we're not at three times that number by then.
im telling you, you cant read someone with meta if you've only seen one alignment
-S
My own Ydrasse experience tells me TGP is probably on the right track but maybe my recall is failing me
In post 175, Endless Terror wrote:the vague claim is slight town!AI since scum!TPB has no need to claim a vague neg utility role as vague roles don't give cred and it limits future fakeclaiming choices
Yeah I also feel this, TPB’s claim definitely feels like a town one, but I don’t feel 100% okay diving into the nitty gritty of why.
In post 193, Endless Terror wrote:i kind of think these recent posts by ydra are pretty good but at the same time i have an impression of town!ydrasse not fluffing in rvs somehow.
-S
My recollection is town!Ydrasse is fine being fluffy but Imight need to check myself on that (or Bell can remind me, since my point of reference is the Forest Fire game where I’m remembering Ydrasse as town-aligned in rn)
In post 198, Endless Terror wrote:
this is some strange shade to be throwing. claiming ascetic day 1 is correct even if its boring, but i also dunno why the flavor was included. ping
-tay
honestly I’m somewhat with Ari about how GPX’s claim feels, the flavor addition feels a bit excessive + I don’t think Boon likes to have flavored roles if they do nothing different? Although, if ET can corroborate that they also are a flavored ascetic I’ll leave it alone as NAI.
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
Visit my
new
GTKAS page
here!