In post 352, Bell wrote:Probably the first and easiest thing to do here is just ask Gypyx if he was being honest with his opening claim.
Just FYI. I was not. My second claim however was true.
Pedit: between Taylor and shelly.
(This honestly feels like a waste of time. There's no real reason to suspect that Gypyx was joking about their claim.)
I can agree with being perhaps overzealous, but that by itself shouldn't be a reason to have an issue with me.
In post 363, BrightEyedFish wrote:Can someone recap the last 10 pages?
Also, please update the list with any new CLAIMS MADE.
Seriously, don't be so lazy. It would help you a lot, both as town and scum.
In post 366, BrightEyedFish wrote:I mean a wise men once said that a BEF D1 wagon has scum at the helm.
It's been awhile since it's happened but maybe that sentiment still stands.
An anecdote is far from useful.
Pelican is far from obvtown. Bell isn't obvtown either.
In post 383, BrightEyedFish wrote: In post 380, Endless Terror wrote:Taylor townleans Ydrasse. For what it's worth they're my least-magnitude SR right now.
I feel like ydrasses defense in
277 contradicts with
368 poking at the claims list a bit
In the real time read I didn't see the contradiction, reading back now it feels off and not as genuine as in RT.
I hope you will get over it is all I can say. Just don't tunnel me and be open to me being town.
At this point, you are just begging to be townread... Why do you expect that to change someone's read on you?
In post 391, Endless Terror wrote:BEF why are your respnses so dodgy and fence-sitty and unwilling to take up responsibility for reading us. and basically making some ~effort~ to read us seemingly while still putting us as "maybe town, maybe scum" which applies to everyone.
-S
This is a really comment from Endless Terror.
In post 395, Ydrasse wrote:
it was, and i found that comment dumb because i don't see it as rolefishing at all when they're asking for roles that people have already outted at that point, but i don't find it as gross as the way that samantha interacted with bef in
251,
257, and
259. the last post especially has these like... weird vibes, like samantha has already written off bef entirely for what i find (at that point in the game) bad reason. it's flippant but i don't get why at all.
I see nothing wrong with
251. They clearly state why they wanted to switch the wagon to BrightEyedFish. Wanting to vote a player is by no means writing a player off.
257 perhaps doesn't come across as friendly, but it is an appropriate response to a question already answered once. Again, I don't see what you see.
259 is perhaps the worst as it is rather flippant (and I agree--chalking it up as a joke doesn't quite seem right), but when we look at it from a holistic view, it's still within the realm of reasonable, and it does not necessarily imply (though it may to some extent suggest) that samantha is unwilling to engage with BrightEyedFish. Furthermore, BrightEyedFish had yet to do anything at the time to encourage samantha to reconsider.
(Make it a habit, and it will come naturally. Start by signing when you first start making your post so that you do not forget later.)
In post 412, Ydrasse wrote:posted recently and posted non-fluff
and apparently that's why my eyes glaze over the tsunami slot because the nora-head posts a ton of it. 72's (i think it was his) posts are a lot better but they're drowned out by a ton of padding.
does noraa fluff a lot in general or is it skewed more towards one alignment? and even then, does she still try to provide a decent amount of content? there's some in there but it's scarce.
(This is a fair assessment of BrightEyedFish's more recent posts, but I would argue that despite not being "fluff", their recent posts aren't exactly "useful".)
In post 430, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:I guess Nico is drifting more into my "would fade" category if she keeps not posting but that's not really a scumlean, just a slot I'm not excited to keep waiting to do anything
(I'm going to note this is fairly typical from that slot. We can only pray that we get more engagement there.)
In post 440, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:No it's based on disliking several different points Taly has made and not seeing a lot there that I like despite volume. I don't feel like walling tonight, but basically I have a pretty easy time seeing almost every post Taly has made as coming from scum. Titus's posts could go either way but aren't particularly townie
I largely agree with this sentiment.
In post 448, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:
In post 145, The Pelican Brief wrote:
I don't like that your focus here is to state that my posts were scummy without actually explaining what the issue you found with them was.
My reply about those posts came
after
your vote.
~Taly
In 133 Taly says he made deliberately unnatural/scummy posts but then acts like I need to explain why the posts he says he crafted to be scummy are scummy
this is not how town plays
Yes, I agree that this felt more of a "you're scum regardless of what you do" kind of thing, and it didn't vibe with me at all.
Yeah, it was very sudden and unexplained. Hence, I pointed this out earlier, and did not really get a satisfactory response to the question.
In post 448, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:idk this just seems random for day 1, why is Taly posting so much scum meta? this comes out of nowhere and feels like overcompensating
This is my top scumread by far
Yeah, the meta thing also just appeared out of nowhere, and it did not leave a good impression.
In post 454, The Pelican Brief wrote:"Scummy" was never used as a term, don't twist it that way.
I wanted to see how people would react, so I make statements that aren't committal to see how people interpret them.
Regardless of this fact, these so called reaction tests are not at all reliable because both town and scum are going to call you out for it, and justifiably so. How did you expect this to help you distinguish between town and scum?
While subtlety can be useful in some cases, I don't think this is a case where it was useful. We are not mind-readers; some things have to be laid out explicitly.
In post 454, The Pelican Brief wrote:Titus had pings with Sam's posts, so I leaned in on that for the vote whenever Sam chalked the "likely story" post up to a joke 279 because I figured her intention of the wagon might not have been to get BEF to spew because her scumread on him was based around a lack of content. Since she dismissed BEF and never really followed up on him, I thought it possible that her wagon is scum-led. I thought she'd be more present in this thread to resolve her reads by now, and interaction with BEF.
Like I said above, I agree that
279 was kinda bad from samantha and a little bit overly dismissive. That said, samantha expressed legitimate concerns earlier as well, and BrightEyedFish had done nothing to make one reconsider.
They did not explicitly ask you to link all these games though, now did they? It still seems a bit random and unnecessary.
In post 459, Gypyx wrote:Hey so, why is samantha getting wagonned exactly? It seems mostly like low-explaination votes compared to the rest of this game
That's exactly what it was.
In post 464, The Pelican Brief wrote:The pushback on the samantha wagon but not the BEF wagon is noted. I want to specifically watch Ircher because his defense of Sam seems scummier than the wtf my pointless wagon isn't winning day one ala Gypyx.
This is rich; it's a real stretch to say that there has been very little pushback to the BEF wagon. In fact, I would say that the BEF counterwagon is exactly that: a pushback against the BEF wagon.
In post 468, Gamma Emerald wrote:Imo Pelican is probably towny for the way they claimed at least, as for the other three I do think Ari should be posting more, TGP idk why he's profiled as low contribution, at least in the same tier as those other 2. He hasn't posted much but imo he has contributed.
Remind me, what was townie about the way they claimed?
In post 469, Gamma Emerald wrote:Like I really feel like the cagey way they claimed neg-utility is a very towny way to do it, especially if I'm right about something else, something that will probably not be clarifiable until D3.
Oh okay, you gave your reason in the next post. This doesn't really convince me, but to each their own I guess.
---
I'm dividing this into two posts because I know this one is pretty long already.