Xenoblade 2 Mafia: Game Over

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:01 am

In post 609, Fermis Flames wrote:
In post 586, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 569, Fermis Flames wrote:reliably tell our posts apart when we're in morph-mode
This is exactly why I feel it was collateral, if that makes sense. While I no doubt believe we would have gone at it separately as well, you can look back at when I started to stop town blocking your slot was when I found out Cabd was in that hydra, so I went after and discredited your slot, which was also discrediting you.

We fought, yes, but I went back and forth town reading and scum reading multiple times.

This time, it will be through a different lens from both sides, and I’m interested to see what happens. I don’t think it will be the same situation at all, mainly based on the nightmare one of you guys reply towards me, and Tammy’s playstyle.

We are still the most likely to argue against each other in that, however. You are right.
Your mistake was in focusing on discrediting us instead of reading us.

But, enough of re-litigating that game.

~ strange.

Every day I was an active participant in came to a scum fade besides Day 1. I don’t know if it was a mistake.

But yeah, we can move on from that long game

ISO · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:01 am

Scum reading = SR

Flavor Leaf · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:02 am

In post 669, SirCakez wrote:I see this game will continue the obnoxious trend of people SRing me without explaining why

Why does that bother you?

MariaR · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:02 am

The irony of this situation continues to amuse me. Anyway I've gained all I need for now so I'm gonna dip blah blah vote Regan/Cakez but Cakez first

Battle Mage · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:02 am

just a joke

ManWithNoName · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:03 am

In post 678, MariaR wrote:The irony of this situation continues to amuse me. Anyway I've gained all I need for now so I'm gonna dip blah blah vote Regan/Cakez but Cakez first

Reagan didn't run with Cakez as his Running mate, though.

ISO · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:03 am

In post 677, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 669, SirCakez wrote:I see this game will continue the obnoxious trend of people SRing me without explaining why
Why does that bother you?

Because I dislike being scum read in general so I usually try to argue against why people are SRing me
I can't do that if people don't explain why

ISO · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:04 am

Thus why I'm excited for Cabd's wall

ManWithNoName · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:04 am

But, yeah, I don't see this viewpoint from town on Cakez. Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"

midwaybear · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:04 am

In post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"

What's the difference

ISO · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:05 am

In post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:But, yeah, I don't see this viewpoint from town on Cakez. Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"

That is what I'm saying yes

ISO · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:05 am

What is ManWithNoName's push on me even

ManWithNoName · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:07 am

In post 684, midwaybear wrote:
In post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"
What's the difference

It's the difference between him scum hunting and him saying he just wants people to sell him as scum to him.

Which, I'm not going to sit here and convince a man he is scum, he's never going to admit it.

REAGAN BUSH 84 · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:07 am

In post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:But, yeah, I don't see this viewpoint from town on Cakez. Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"

don't think "why me" is a reliable tell

ISO · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:07 am

You don't need to convince me I'm scum lol but some actual reasoning is nice

ManWithNoName · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:08 am

Eh, maybe people just deal with shit differently than me, but I'm not super concerned when there's so few votes out there on me.

Fermis Flames · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:08 am

In post 30, Cabd wrote:Page count: 2/60

I have decided to spurn the advances of both ffery and syr and sort that abomination entirely via Tammy. No pressure, Tammy!

lol is this why you don't have us listed in your masonry post, reads, something?

That might have changed but some time back I checked the discord channel and their was umbrage, not major it's still early mind you, but the kettle's on.

But I mean there goes my earlier thought that if I don't still have my +20 town mojo ring, it didn't matter because ffery is in this hydra and when does she never shine? i was gonna borrow hers (syryana shines too but he might be harder to read sometimes?) SO THANKS FOR THAT CABD!

Fermis Flames · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:09 am

In post 688, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:
In post 683, ManWithNoName wrote:But, yeah, I don't see this viewpoint from town on Cakez. Like, he's not going "Look at this read" it really feels like he's saying "Tell me why I'm scum!"
don't think "why me" is a reliable tell

You're going to have to give up your EM card.

~ strange

ManWithNoName · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:09 am

In post 689, SirCakez wrote:You don't need to convince me I'm scum lol but some actual reasoning is nice

I will say, I'm not sold on your push of Balfruss, and you used meta to mislead. That's enough for me a few hours in.

Usually I'd just want to be shitposting some more.

Fermis Flames · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:10 am

In post 693, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 689, SirCakez wrote:You don't need to convince me I'm scum lol but some actual reasoning is nice
I will say, I'm not sold on your push of Balfruss, and you used meta to mislead. That's enough for me a few hours in.

Usually I'd just want to be shitposting some more.

yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes

Fermis Flames · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:10 am

that was a yes to the shitposting not whatever balfruss thing was.

sorry I keep forgetting to sign. I'm charming dammit!

midwaybear · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:10 am

In post 687, ManWithNoName wrote:It's the difference between him scum hunting and him saying he just wants people to sell him as scum to him.

I feel like he has been scum hunting to some extent. Definitely not just wanting to engage about other's read on him.

ManWithNoName · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:11 am

In post 694, Fermis Flames wrote:
In post 693, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 689, SirCakez wrote:You don't need to convince me I'm scum lol but some actual reasoning is nice
I will say, I'm not sold on your push of Balfruss, and you used meta to mislead. That's enough for me a few hours in.

Usually I'd just want to be shitposting some more.
yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes

I can indeed shitpost some more, and I hope this is what you're saying yes to.

Because I'm going to.

Battle Mage · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:11 am

In post 693, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 689, SirCakez wrote:You don't need to convince me I'm scum lol but some actual reasoning is nice
I will say, I'm not sold on your push of Balfruss, and you used meta to mislead. That's enough for me a few hours in.

Usually I'd just want to be shitposting some more.

a fair read, although I would say I actually liked the fact he went back to the game and tried to defend it, rather than just letting it go. my main worry with Cakez is that I don't feel genuine solving vibes yet, it's mostly just defensive.

Battle Mage · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Mon Nov 16, 2020 11:11 am

In post 697, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 694, Fermis Flames wrote:
In post 693, ManWithNoName wrote:
In post 689, SirCakez wrote:You don't need to convince me I'm scum lol but some actual reasoning is nice
I will say, I'm not sold on your push of Balfruss, and you used meta to mislead. That's enough for me a few hours in.

Usually I'd just want to be shitposting some more.
yesyesyesyesyesyesyesyes
I can indeed shitpost some more, and I hope this is what you're saying yes to.

Because I'm going to.