Now this is more up my alleyway. I am thinking something similar to this, yes.In post 972, Cobra Kai wrote:I was thinking along the lines of giveeveryonea pool of 2 or 3 to target in. Everyone meaning everyone.
dude u modded that game. you literally knew my alignment right off the bat.In post 971, SirCakez wrote:Ok then how come you just said I SRed you in that game
i'm a blade, but i need a driverIn post 973, Noraa wrote:why is u so insistent on finding out whether I'm a driver or a blade?In post 968, Battle Mage wrote:noraa if you'd like a special gift
drive on over, give me a lift
because if you come and visit me
i can give you 1 x elim immunity
BullshitIn post 951, Noraa wrote:what a lie. in my only game with you, I was town and you SRed me.In post 948, SirCakez wrote:the bigger discussion here is why Noraa is not giving me any town vibes at all when I usually get them from her immediately
mm I see. add some lollipops into the mix and I'm sure someone'll take ur offer.In post 977, Battle Mage wrote:i'm a blade, but i need a driver
In post 975, Cabd wrote:Now this is more up my alleyway. I am thinking something similar to this, yes.In post 972, Cobra Kai wrote:I was thinking along the lines of giveeveryonea pool of 2 or 3 to target in. Everyone meaning everyone.
I have shudders of fear of Marketplace Mafia III whenever I think to hard about forcing the issue, though.
Damn right I am.In post 976, Noraa wrote:Cabd's right
In post 962, SirCakez wrote:And i'm also using your town meta from the Great Idea game I just modded
i'll see you tonightIn post 980, Noraa wrote:mm I see. add some lollipops into the mix and I'm sure someone'll take ur offer.In post 977, Battle Mage wrote:i'm a blade, but i need a driver
ur both wrong
It’a serious, but in a dramatic dry kinda way where it’s tinfoil still, but paranoia takes over.In post 970, Cabd wrote:Is this a serious accusation? Because I'm interested and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
while youre reaching that far can you bring me some ice creamIn post 959, Gamma Emerald wrote:What are you trying to drive atIn post 847, L4pe wrote:reading the post explains the postIn post 835, Gamma Emerald wrote:What is this supposed to meanIn post 556, L4pe wrote:im willing to buy that the personal attacks are quite genuine
i just think theyre nai
Like this feels like some hard IIOA, and it also sounds weird re: calling my personal attacks genuine. It’s essentially saying my points against BM’s character are correct. That such a slimy thing to say and I don’t like it.
He lifted not one finger to get Tayl0r elimed before we outed the Dethy. He had her in his elim pool, but she wasn't his priority.In post 944, SirCakez wrote:Ok sure but both were your SRsIn post 926, Cabd wrote:I wanted Bell. Bell was indeed scum. We got taylor instead which on one hand yay, but on the other, getting Bell would have been sweeter because he was a suicide bomber and taylor was a boring traitor that I'd have vigged N1 for the deathy instead.In post 921, SirCakez wrote:this is just a lie considering we got Taylo0r through in literally our last game togetherIn post 915, Cabd wrote:Like I'm tired of having kickass day one scumreads and never getting it through because other shininess.
This is my², Zanza, Bionis Aligned Odd-Night Ability Cop, was lynched Day 1.Ok sure if it's specifically eliming his top scum read day 1 then sureIn post 931, Fermis Flames wrote:This is a skeevy take. It was the right elim given lolmasonry, but his scumread was also dead-right.In post 921, SirCakez wrote:this is just a lie considering we got Taylo0r through in literally our last game togetherIn post 915, Cabd wrote:Like I'm tired of having kickass day one scumreads and never getting it through because other shininess.
This is my², Zanza, Bionis Aligned Odd-Night Ability Cop, was lynched Day 1.
~ strange
But to say his SRs are not elimmed D1 is not true
In post 965, Cabd wrote:I don't, thanks for asking!In post 947, Cobra Kai wrote:Do you not like the idea of pre-planned pairs, cabd? Would it be better if we had some way to circumvent outright claiming?
Claiming blade in this setup means claiming a power role, effectively, from my understanding.
Why would we ever claim the PR pool to public knowledge?
Good enough for government work today. I'll note it and one of us can bring it back up if it becomes relevant again, I guess.In post 986, Flavor Leaf wrote:It’a serious, but in a dramatic dry kinda way where it’s tinfoil still, but paranoia takes over.In post 970, Cabd wrote:Is this a serious accusation? Because I'm interested and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
It basically means I’m getting off vibes in that general direction.
In post 984, Battle Mage wrote:i'll see you tonight
Put this in my ISO. my wiki needs more quotesIn post 987, Fermis Flames wrote:Nora chooses weird things to comment on like they’re playing the lottery and responding to whatever post number comes out of the wheel.
True. But I think in some cases, given that the mods explicitly called out "Xshots don't get refunds" (which I take to mean pretty much every PR is gonna be gated somehow) and the size of the player list, that it might be okay to have some blades use bide and then hit night two with twice the effective power.In post 990, Dunnstral wrote:In post 965, Cabd wrote:I don't, thanks for asking!In post 947, Cobra Kai wrote:Do you not like the idea of pre-planned pairs, cabd? Would it be better if we had some way to circumvent outright claiming?
Claiming blade in this setup means claiming a power role, effectively, from my understanding.
Why would we ever claim the PR pool to public knowledge?
The pro side to claiming is that drivers and blades can use their powers, whereas they are more likely to incorrectly pair up if they don't claim.
Of course, this can lead to things like all the blades dying, but that takes multiple nights.
Personally, I don't think we should claim, but something to note: Now that multiple blades have claimed, drivers are overwhelmingly likely to target only those blades who have claimed, meaning any remaining blades who don't claim are effectively choosing to do nothing (I'm still not advocating for all blades to claim, there are alternate solutions to this, such as drivers not doubling up so hard on claimed blades)
dumb this down 50% and maybe I'll understand what ur saying.In post 989, Fermis Flames wrote:He lifted not one finger to get Tayl0r elimed before we outed the Dethy. He had her in his elim pool, but she wasn't his priority.
Anyway, this is neither here nor there. The here and there are his scumread of you in this game.
Ok and what's the problem with this? Just because I knew your alignment doesn't mean I can't use your meta from itIn post 983, Noraa wrote:In post 962, SirCakez wrote:And i'm also using your town meta from the Great Idea game I just modded
yeah this is worrisome.In post 990, Dunnstral wrote:Now that multiple blades have claimed, drivers are overwhelmingly likely to target only those blades who have claimed, meaning any remaining blades who don't claim are effectively choosing to do nothing (I'm still not advocating for all blades to claim, there are alternate solutions to this, such as drivers not doubling up so hard on claimed blades)
