Large Normal 230 - Game Over

[SirCakez]

Votecount 1.11

Pretentious (5) - NorwegianboyEE, Nero Cain, muh316, Gamma Emerald, TheDuke
NorwegianboyEE (2) - Pretentious, Albert B. Rampage
innocentvillager (2) - DrippingGoofball, NoPowerOverMe
muh316 (1) - Tayl0r Swift
Umlaut (1) - innocentvillager
Glitch (1) - May

Not voting (5) - Non lmh, TheGoldenParadox, Umlaut, Guillotina, Glitch

(expired on 2020-11-29 10:00:00) remain until day end

With 17 players alive, it takes 9 to reach a majority.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Late wagon Muh vote? Then why do you townread Pretentious?

Because you're scum and desperate to lynch him to end the day before the town starts waking up to all the shit you've really been up to.

[NorwegianboyEE]

And do you townread muh ABR?

Muh is town.

Pretentious also voted Muh.
Why is he town?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Pretentious voted him without reading BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE DOES.

How many times so I have to repeat that his fake hammer is NAI!?

[NorwegianboyEE]

Pretentious voted him without reading BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE DOES.

How many times so I have to repeat that his fake hammer is NAI!?

So you read him for meta.
Are you familiar with my meta? Why do you townread him for meta while not considering my meta?

[Albert B. Rampage]

You're DONE in this town. Finished. Forget about leading your lurksack coasting scumbuddies, it's OVER FOR YOU.

[NorwegianboyEE]

You're DONE in this town. Finished. Forget about leading your lurksack coasting scumbuddies, it's OVER FOR YOU.

You are very boring to talk to.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Fuck your self-meta. You are scum.

[NorwegianboyEE]

Again, why?

[NorwegianboyEE]

You can keep this up all day. It doesn't make it true.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Trying to end the day without evidence by rushing elim on muh and pretentious.

[NorwegianboyEE]

Trying to end the day without evidence by rushing elim on muh and pretentious.

If you look at my ISO you can see that i've clearly not rushed the vote on Pretentious, i've given him time to talk, discuss. Opportunities to debate. Now it's gone on for 20 pages, how exactly would i play this out differently if i'm town? Let him talk for 40 pages more?
And why is voting to end the day on an compromise elimination scummy?

[Nero Cain]

lol @ IV acting like I haven't already been calling him scum.

[Nero Cain]

I'm haveing like a really hard time telling who is scum and who is just really bad town.

[Albert B. Rampage]

20 pages in 24h where we ran in circles, with 9 days left where we can push your lurksack scumbuddies and actually progress our reads.

[NorwegianboyEE]

I'm haveing like a really hard time telling who is scum and who is just really bad town.

Such as who?

[NorwegianboyEE]

20 pages in 24h where we ran in circles, with 9 days left where we can push your lurksack scumbuddies and actually progress our reads.

Is there any reason you seem to believe i have lurksack scumbuddies?
Because it seems brought up out of nowhere just like many of your previous points.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Call it a working theory.

[innocentvillager]

lol @ IV acting like I haven't already been calling him scum.

i know you have, that's why it's funny lol

I'm haveing like a really hard time telling who is scum and who is just really bad town.

I'm not scum, so i must be really bad town

[NorwegianboyEE]

It's very tiring to debate ABR because he consistently brings up theories that are presented as conclusive evidence, and just the fact that you're arguing against him means he can argue that you implicitly agree to his flawed premise just by entertaining and humoring the thought.

[innocentvillager]

It's very tiring to debate ABR because he consistently brings up theories that are presented as conclusive evidence, and just the fact that you're arguing against him means he can argue that you implicitly agree to his flawed premise just by entertaining and humoring the thought.

it's ok norway! i will whiteknight and defend you from the mean abr!

[NorwegianboyEE]

It's very tiring to debate ABR because he consistently brings up theories that are presented as conclusive evidence, and just the fact that you're arguing against him means he can argue that you implicitly agree to his flawed premise just by entertaining and humoring the thought.

it's ok norway! i will whiteknight and defend you from the mean abr!

Is that sarcasm? I can defend myself just fine.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Your pushes have not been beneficial to town and people are starting to catch on.

[innocentvillager]

not really sarcasm, more just lighthearted fun

im here for fun

f u n

and i do TR both of you so

[NorwegianboyEE]

people are starting to catch on.

Again, just you saying something doesn't make it true?
Anyway i'll stop feeding into your arguments now because we're just going in circles and it's not productive.