Idk. Hopefully I am otherwise poor johnny won't even get to do much before he just dies
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
-nnornor
Is this aimed at me or at everyone? o.oIn post 1366, Purple Heart wrote:Flea
On a non-game level, I appreciate your sentiment Flea and I reciprocate it. But what I would like for people to do is evaluate my posts instead of labeling this slot as lockscum due to 1/2 of the heads. I get the impression that people are dismissing my input in favor of asserting an easier read on Alisae but we're both the same alignment. It feels easier and noncommittal to criticize only half of the mindset of this slot even though one head has a higher volume of posts that have garnered valid criticism. I support Alisae's self-assessment because I have been familiar with their progression and mentality on this site for years, and while their approach may be soundly assessed as manipulative or agenda-based, I haven't concluded their approach themselves as a concrete alignment. But the previous statement merely clouds other people's judgment on the slot, so I want people to take an active approach to this head rather than speak around this head for a stronger solve and idea on my POV.
Eh not entirelyIn post 1361, Purple Heart wrote:I feel like that’s what I am trying to encourageIn post 1344, Gamma Emerald wrote:I hate this fatalistic approach to wineIn post 1234, Purple Heart wrote:Just as you believe you have a sufficient amount of information to interpret my slot as scum, another player may have a sufficient amount of information to interpret my slot as town.
Its all wine.
Tbh I think the best way to handle wine is to cut the cask, that is, to settle in on a conclusion that you feel good about rather than fretting endlessly.
I don’t get this anger . >:?In post 1373, kookiemonster wrote:Im very fucking mad about that game. VERY FUCKING MAD.In post 1371, MURDERCAT wrote:What's with the aggressiveness this game NoraaIn post 1369, kookiemonster wrote:I suggest you never bring this up in front of me again. ty.
I literally had to take a few deep breaths while reading that stupid post.
OWER got pretty widely SRed in 2170, idk if it makes him limbait but it might make him feel that wayIn post 1397, Purple Heart wrote:is OWER limbaity? anyone with experience here?
im confused, what's the difference?In post 1404, Gamma Emerald wrote:Eh not entirelyIn post 1361, Purple Heart wrote:I feel like that’s what I am trying to encourageIn post 1344, Gamma Emerald wrote:I hate this fatalistic approach to wineIn post 1234, Purple Heart wrote:Just as you believe you have a sufficient amount of information to interpret my slot as scum, another player may have a sufficient amount of information to interpret my slot as town.
Its all wine.
Tbh I think the best way to handle wine is to cut the cask, that is, to settle in on a conclusion that you feel good about rather than fretting endlessly.
What you seem to be saying is “This post could be X or Y but I think it’s Y” as your approach, mine is just to say “I think this post is Y” and if someone counters with “it could be X” I talk it over.
it was the proposed councils from before the replacements and after, but in cases where there was a more recent readslist posted i used that instead. there was less movement in the lists than i would generally expect from 20 pages in a micro, but that's probably because the relatively short period of time. was trying to see if anyone was lacking in associatives due to the nature of the council.In post 1155, Gamma Emerald wrote:What’s the spreadsheet about
result ended up being the same at least
i am okay with this.In post 1312, MURDERCAT wrote:Let's flip outworld
In post 1410, Purple Heart wrote:the end of the day
Flip flea at least sometime this gameIn post 1415, MURDERCAT wrote:E-1?
You wanna claim outworld
At least give final thoughts, sorry if you are town but I think this is actually a highly informative flip
Read: you promised solvy flareon and I’m not getting itIn post 1416, Infinity 324 wrote:What does it say if he flips town vs. scum?