In post 3820, Smoke and Mirrors wrote: In post 3818, Menalque wrote:Peta is claiming that he went for 1s watcher, which Dave has claimed as a role
I was originally wondering if neither 1s watcher nor doc were in the game, and that’s why scum were hesitant to go for, for example, skitter in the early game — bc they only knew about the watcher not being present, not about the doc
Peta’s claim means that Dave (imo the obviously correct choice to flip on play out of the “possible redirector” slots) was safe, and it loved onto being between (me, S_S, infinity, him)
I was thinking my townflip would look v bad for Dave and peta here and the way they’re tied together would definitely sink the other if the one is scum, but if peta has made plays like that before then he probably is confident enough as scum to make a play like that and to try and win in 7
This might as well be written in French Mena.
Can you explain it like I'm 11?
>no cop claim but we know cop is in game
>cop slot must be in players above TGP, along with peta claiming cop
>lilith is confirmed not-it
>leaves (infinity, S_S, peta, dave)
>Dave is worst looking of those slots and prob the one to be flipped today without a claim
>Dave claims 1s watcher which I would normally totally flip
>peta claims he went for 1s watcher too and claimed he went for cop slot as a gambit
>this puts me back into the pool along with NM
>NM claims neighbouriser which we know exists and apparently can’t be scum because people love ignoring the problem of induction
>means the pool becomes (peta, me, infinity, S_S) as people no longer wanna kill Dave bc he can only be the 1s redirector (confirmed scum through not claiming during massclaim) if peta is lying about going for the 1s watcher