*sniffsniff*
In post 20, team rocket queen wrote:
jessie, please, so i don't make the 'trek' sound in my head. queen jessie is also acceptable.
also, no need to feel terrible on my account, i am me but also not me, so it is my fault that you missed me not yours.
Team Rocket go blasting of aagaaaaain!
...though the...
...inside myself ...
...the mines...
ADHD is fun!
Staaar TRQ'ing across the universe....
blahblahblah mech.... more mech spec... vote update [which has been useful btw]
I like this. Complete honestly, no over explaining just "Nah, why?" and respond to sus with "be reyt, I'm town."
In post 241, team rocket queen wrote: In post 229, Gloria Cleary wrote:I don’t see why. I wasn’t doing much to effort at that time and was actually waiting for someone to ask my thoughts but I finally got tired of waiting. It’s unusual that no one talks to me. In DC, I got questioned by both town and scum after I think one or two posts.
but like, you asked me when i wasn't around and one would generally assume that i would catch up on the last four pages or whatever right?
so:
we're both active > i was involved in setup spec, didn't give reads
time passes
you are active, i am not > you ask me if i have any reads, assumedly because you are looking at my posts and noticing the above > so my thoughts are, hm, why now? why not earlier? like kinda feels like you were searching and i don't really follow how that was meant to get someone to ask your thoughts, as you couldn't have known i was around to do so?
I get asked for reads often when people are struggling to read me [This is the first game I've not been asked, and admittedly I've a VERY limited pool of games]. This seems a little over-defensive and dismissive... Tone seems off in
#435 and
#444 - and still no reads, maybe the teeeeeeensiest hint of suspicion....
In post 615, team rocket queen wrote: In post 611, Hopkirk wrote:You feel very nullish. What are your reads looking like Jessie?
i do feel nullish to me as well. no particularly strong reads, just some thoughts/feelings. dunnstral wants me to place a vote so i will get on this shortly.
Legit, seems to not want much attention overall and overly concerned about mech... There is something to note though... couple things actually.
In post 617, Hopkirk wrote:Can you point out two things in your iso you think are townish?
Wasn't clear at all where the response was going until Gloria asked for clarification, and for someone remarkably null, these are the posts Jessie deems her towniest. One is legit, one is... o.o
Then we're suddenly diving in to interrogations and honestly I can't work out who we're interrogating?
Gloria and Hoppy<3 VERSUS ???
oh wait...
In post 627, team rocket queen wrote: In post 625, team rocket queen wrote:i meant for the purpose of this exchange. like in my head the setting is an interrogation room, and hopkirk is a detective, and you can be the other detective, if you'd like
like i wanted to see what sort of questions hopkirk would ask/was expecting to be asked because he put emphasis on the real time nature of this:
In post 575, Hopkirk wrote:I'll be back in ~20 mins then can respond in real time to anything you wanted to discuss Skitter30.
In post 615, team rocket queen wrote:i do feel nullish to me as well. no particularly strong reads, just some thoughts/feelings. dunnstral wants me to place a vote so i will get on this shortly.
so i made it clear that i have thoughts/feelings, and also that i've read the thread, to get hopkirk to like, ask me specific things instead of just like 'what are your reads', as i wanted to see what hopkirk thought would be important for me to have an opinion on
but in his absence, i'm also curious about what you are interested in
UHmm.... OK I'm not sure now. We talking about interrogating skitter or Jessie? o.o
Kinda feels like jessie
wants
to be interrogated... Would explain stopping me from entering the ISOSPHERE at the time...
In post 711, team rocket queen wrote: In post 698, Isis wrote:Jessie mostly hasn't towntold yet and has touched on a lot of topics where I'd expect her to have towntold.
curious where you think i should have towntold? i know you know i am aware of the things you've previously townread me for. was this a bait?
Post 711 and still annoyingly neutral >.< Like we're over half way in the game here
There's been a wee hint of interaction and a LOT of setup stuff... followed by MORE setup stuffs... and a hint of sarcasm? o.o me no like
pushing hoppy/skittle...
---
This is where things get interesting, at least IMO.
Birthday suit vote... because....
In post 909, team rocket queen wrote:i voted because skitter encouraged me to and earlier in the game she had called me out for not voting and i wanted to see how she'd react.
but...
This is
WEIRD
to me... like weirder than my hyperactive episodes when I fuel them with CAFFFIIIINNNNNEEEEEEE.....
Maybe zoom zoom brain do the zoomy zoomy but why just place it on skitter and call it a reaction test? Also there's around 10 game-relevant posts between the request and vote [Game-relevant - not formatting help or ebwops]
835 confirms a scum read, and reasoning... First thing about it though, and first mention that I can see of a scum read on another player
In post 841, team rocket queen wrote: In post 840, skitter30 wrote:ok then i don't see why it's town indicative any more than asking a followup because he didn't know that recruiting was a mechanic in that game
so gypyx presents
if pregame things happened > jessie is mafia
pooky says, wait, why
isis references menagerie
gypyx says oh! why recruiting!
like it felt like gypyx wasn't presenting a read to do so but hunting for people having information
I... I don't get it :/
I don't get the fixation on
#575 either? like it feels that Jessie's trying to link Skitter and Hoppy but is saying they're both town when we know all town are vanilla town... ~(⊕⌢⊕)~
think it was around here I wanted to try and confirm my reads on a couple of slots... I've managed to confirm a nullscum read... not what I wanted to do
I was town leaning before this.
Now we have the unvote in
#904 without reason, later revealed to be due to hammer concerns... and I start gettin sus.
ok
#926 acknowledge dunn pointed out about posting, I gotta stop getting over excited.
In post 929, team rocket queen wrote:i don't see the benefit of anyone being at e-1. currently i am most suspicious of thegoldenparadox, gloria cleary, and hopkirk. but it's not like a static thing. why would i be confident now when even the person i think is the most likely to be mafia would still almost always be under 50%?
OK so less than 50% chance of a scum read, this bugged me at the time but other things came to mind... like is she reading everyone as town at this point or something ಸ_ಸ
At time time, I assumed I'd missed something - like I'd noted it was irrelevant and I don't recall mentioning gypyx at all. I searched "gyp" in Jessies ISO looking for anything indicative of a read... there's nothing o.o
Then there's the weirdness around
575 and
576 again, and I don't get this...
In post 967, team rocket queen wrote:
no i am suspicious of hopkirk, and one of the reasons i can think of for why that post feels so off to me is that it was a coordinated thing
Skitters town and partners with hopkirk... but hopkirk is a bit sus... in a game where all townies are vanilla [by her reckoning and in the pm preview post]
fast forward a bit...
In post 1136, team rocket queen wrote:
sure if you'd like. i see that you've mentioned me and i haven't yet read last page i just hurried here because i HAD A THOUGHT
I didn't like this at the time, honestly. Seemed like a cheap save of TGP at this point and we go into 3rd party mechanics... which yeah fair the responses seem genuine but I still don't like it...
EUUUUGH
why are you so null?! WHY CANT I READ YOU?!