I've actually got a pretty solid read here now, at the time it was one i was just wanting to confirm.
Much grump.
In post 65, Infinity 324 wrote:ydrasse you're supposed to make a joke or personable comment this is
mafia
there are
rules
Much sass
In post 107, Infinity 324 wrote:We should all marry each other and commit to limming one pair of lovers each day phase
HOPPY MINE!
We're doing what now?
In post 175, Infinity 324 wrote: In post 173, Isis wrote:i mean they're both solving the game
TGP's tone is like D6 eLo tone though
you get what I mean
Ehh, I think it's just as likely to be town exaggerating early reads for reactions.
At the time, this would've been reasonable, sadly TGP didn't back down. I kinda think TGP looked for easy options and tried to see what would be the easier targets...
In post 186, Infinity 324 wrote: In post 184, Hopkirk wrote:If we vote Isis and pretend we think she's really suspicious then Pooky is going to be super worried than we legitimately plan to lethal her. Then he's going to be distraught and will obvtown hard. I like your thinking Infinity.
Lol I forgot where my vote was
VOTE: taylor
In post 194, Infinity 324 wrote:Maybe I’m seeing the same things hopkirk is? I also think taylor is relatively likely to have engaged with me on game-relevant things as town
I like this. "Oops I dun goofed" and linking in to other players reads while making his own point.
Neither was I honestly, and I was playing! >.< stoopid brainfog.
In post 299, Infinity 324 wrote:Yeah makes sense. I tend to write off meme’ing as NAI but maybe it says more about a player’s mental state than I’m giving it credit for.
As I've said previously, don't look at my mental state... You've seen the picture of my brain.. 【•】_【•】
Meta stuff. meta stuff.....
I'm still missing the townblock, ngl. Then again I tend to be oblivious to this stuff. Someones tried pocketing me and I didn't even notice or comply, apparently to their frustration lol
In post 394, Infinity 324 wrote:
Me, you, isis, ydrasse, hopkirk, jessie
Ok it’s not as big as I thought, I’m probably just projecting because I’m getting townvibes from a bunch of people
OOO it's here
Soooooo assuming this gets read and going along with "oh noes scumz has infiltrated our powerful and mighty townblock!", who do you think it would most likely to be? Noting that it isn't
your
townblock, but the seeming consensus one based on reads.
Infinity's progression feels really nice and natural on reads. His play so far feels really organic as well. Reads are being justified and people are being poked
In post 580, Infinity 324 wrote: In post 572, skitter30 wrote: In post 566, Morning Tweet wrote:I like the couple of posts where ydrasse explained her scum self to me -- 363 especially. im a sucker for self meta and it felt like she was explaining something that made sense to her although i didnt quite understand
ehhhh i can see it i guess
Really? That feels like a good angle for scum to fake tbh
This is why I don't meta
On the flip side, wouldn't a meta read-y player be able to see through this though?
In post 670, Infinity 324 wrote: In post 668, Ydrasse wrote:i... am not vibing a lot with hopkirk's posting
like, he's mad cute but his posting doesn't inspire much joy + i feel his positioning around skitter in this sort of "null town land but also maybe scum" just... doesn't seem good.
Ehh I can relate to the idea that scum are often null town, happens to me a lot
Noted
In post 675, Infinity 324 wrote:I’m trying to deal with the fact that I often have too many townreads in games, and I’m wondering if questioning my townreads early before a wrong read gets solidified will help with that. I’m also affected by what happened in deaths curse.
This is why I'm ISO'ing some people. There's a lot of townie players and I want to try and confirm reads. I had you as prolly town at the time I made the list, as I've gone into this I've gone to yuptown and honestly this is just to make sure I'm not missing something ヾ(＠⌒▽⌒＠)ﾉ [I love that face, it's well weird
]
In post 680, Infinity 324 wrote: In post 676, Morning Tweet wrote:Is (or was) your concern that the thread overall had too many townreads, or just that you yourself do?
I think I was projecting my concern about having too many townreads onto the thread, even though I shouldn’t really be worried about others’ townreads as this stage. I did see a bunch of townreads being thrown out but that’s probably not what I was worried about deep down.
Honestly there seems to be a lot of townreads in the thread imo, I don't recall seeing much outside of Dunn/Gypyx/skitter for players who aren't being seen as town.
Meta, scum hunting, town reading... all feels nice and smooth, the tone of the posts isn't changing, points are clear and direct. I'm just over half way as this point and it's been nothing less than warm and fuzzy
In post 788, Infinity 324 wrote:That’s just a personality trait of mine I guess. I’m bad at articulating my feelings, and sometimes if I push myself I can put things into words but often not.
This is why I just let the chaos free
or at least try to ヽ(^◇^*)/
I'm pretty much at locktown at this point. Infinity is being like fully transparent in their posts, they're questioning things and attempting to understand everyone's PoV and working with people in the thread. Reads are shifting naturally and being adequately justified enough. Even when it's not 100% clear on why he's getting that kinda read he's being totally honest.
This caught me off a bit though.
In post 1045, Infinity 324 wrote:
Because you are? Your posts read like scum who previously had a townread on TGP and is trying to justify a vote there.
I feel like the hammer talk could’ve been a reason why TGP accepted their death so early. Why did you think that was scum-indicative?
Followed with a perfect example of infinitown imo.
But this is where the aggression starts being turned up a bit too. The skitter vote has no other information, but a scumread was made clear much earlier.
In post 1100, Infinity 324 wrote: In post 1054, Gloria Cleary wrote:
Dafuq, that’s ubertownie? She’s re-evaluating based on possibly new info which is exactly what you expect town to do. Between Jessie sr me for not posting every single goddamned thought and now this, I almost wonder if I’m being punk’d here.
Ok, I did want to talk about this cause I’m still not sure on MT. Yes town re-evaluates based on new information, but there didn’t really seem to be any new information that MT was taking into account. Yes town can go back and ISO someone, but it didn’t seem particularly motivated to me. Scum opportunism seemed like a likely reason to re-evaluate there. Yeah personality could be another reason, but my gut is still kinda bothered by it.
My response to this is I got a townlead go back to solid null when I decided to try and confirm a few reads. Admittedly the hammer sequence did help shift my read on Jessie.
And we're back to damn good, and full transparent reasoning. Infinity's hiding nothing.
In post 1224, Infinity 324 wrote:Skitter’s posts make my stomach wriggle and squirm and do somersaults. From past experience, this correlates with a high likelihood that she is a member of the mafia.
As with here... OK fine this isn't really a good basis for a scum read but it's matching up with all he's done so far.
In post 1242, Infinity 324 wrote:TGP can you try to put some of your feelings into words? It’s difficult and I struggle with it too, but I keep getting townpings from your posts and I don’t want you to get mislimmed. I think I’ve seen you be solvy before (boardgames) so try to channel that energy.
This is just some good juju right here. Offering some motivation and reinforcement and its makes me warm and fuzzy really with reading the rest of the iso...
