I thought you were going for a "reputation" angle (like, this holds if you replace elements w/ someone like me instead), but w/ the latter half of what you said I don't think it becomes as relevant to harp on.In post 223, Prism wrote:thought it might not be from Elements' perspective.
This is really the crux: curious as to why you think thisI think even without knowing them, and only seeing this game, this holds true, though.
I have some meta with Prism that I would like to check first. Either way, I'm not sure that I would want them in yet. I have confidence they will town tell as the game goes on if they're town, so I think I'd probably rather wait for that to happen.In post 224, Syryana wrote:I think we should cover ourselves by inviting more masons to our party. Think we should let prism in?In post 217, Mod Pizza wrote:To the second, sounds kinda kinky, I'm in. Also more excellent cover for our masonry, so I appreciate it from a strategic point of view as well.
Your sorting me is usually a little louder iirc, our last 2 games notwithstanding.In post 224, Syryana wrote:I think we should cover ourselves by inviting more masons to our party. Think we should let prism in?In post 217, Mod Pizza wrote:To the second, sounds kinda kinky, I'm in. Also more excellent cover for our masonry, so I appreciate it from a strategic point of view as well.
Pedit: ? You think I haven't already been sorting you?
But you're ok with me getting an invitation.In post 226, Mod Pizza wrote:I have some meta with Prism that I would like to check first. Either way, I'm not sure that I would want them in yet. I have confidence they will town tell as the game goes on if they're town, so I think I'd probably rather wait for that to happen.In post 224, Syryana wrote:I think we should cover ourselves by inviting more masons to our party. Think we should let prism in?In post 217, Mod Pizza wrote:To the second, sounds kinda kinky, I'm in. Also more excellent cover for our masonry, so I appreciate it from a strategic point of view as well.
Sure!In post 228, fferyllt wrote:But you're ok with me getting an invitation.In post 226, Mod Pizza wrote:I have some meta with Prism that I would like to check first. Either way, I'm not sure that I would want them in yet. I have confidence they will town tell as the game goes on if they're town, so I think I'd probably rather wait for that to happen.In post 224, Syryana wrote:I think we should cover ourselves by inviting more masons to our party. Think we should let prism in?In post 217, Mod Pizza wrote:To the second, sounds kinda kinky, I'm in. Also more excellent cover for our masonry, so I appreciate it from a strategic point of view as well.
I can respect that. I still like them so far though.In post 226, Mod Pizza wrote:I have some meta with Prism that I would like to check first. Either way, I'm not sure that I would want them in yet. I have confidence they will town tell as the game goes on if they're town, so I think I'd probably rather wait for that to happen.In post 224, Syryana wrote:I think we should cover ourselves by inviting more masons to our party. Think we should let prism in?In post 217, Mod Pizza wrote:To the second, sounds kinda kinky, I'm in. Also more excellent cover for our masonry, so I appreciate it from a strategic point of view as well.
Our last two games are the only games I've played in years though? Watching you and Cabd interact is far more telling than anything I could say or ask. That's how I read you in smoke. So what's the problem here, exactly?fferyllt wrote:Your sorting me is usually a little louder iirc, our last 2 games notwithstanding.In post 224, Syryana wrote:I think we should cover ourselves by inviting more masons to our party. Think we should let prism in?In post 217, Mod Pizza wrote:To the second, sounds kinda kinky, I'm in. Also more excellent cover for our masonry, so I appreciate it from a strategic point of view as well.
Pedit: ? You think I haven't already been sorting you?
I'll hold off inducting prism if you hold off on this one for me for a bit.Mod Pizza wrote:Sure!In post 228, fferyllt wrote:But you're ok with me getting an invitation.In post 226, Mod Pizza wrote:I have some meta with Prism that I would like to check first. Either way, I'm not sure that I would want them in yet. I have confidence they will town tell as the game goes on if they're town, so I think I'd probably rather wait for that to happen.In post 224, Syryana wrote:I think we should cover ourselves by inviting more masons to our party. Think we should let prism in?In post 217, Mod Pizza wrote:To the second, sounds kinda kinky, I'm in. Also more excellent cover for our masonry, so I appreciate it from a strategic point of view as well.
Three active, strong posters.In post 225, borkjerfkin wrote:This is really the crux: curious as to why you think thisI think even without knowing them, and only seeing this game, this holds true, though.
We have a deal,In post 232, Syryana wrote:I'll hold off inducting prism if you hold off on this one for me for a bit.
What have you gotten from our interaction?In post 232, Syryana wrote:Our last two games are the only games I've played in years though? Watching you and Cabd interact is far more telling than anything I could say or ask. That's how I read you in smoke. So what's the problem here, exactly?
Yay! I'm impressed you built on my plan to hide us from scum by pretending we're scum pretending with masons. We should see how many levels deep we can get before we endgame prism.In post 234, Mod Pizza wrote:We have a deal,In post 232, Syryana wrote:I'll hold off inducting prism if you hold off on this one for me for a bit.scummason buddy
Come on, this game isn't exactly filled w/ shlubs and I don't feel like they've been dominating the game in any real perceivable capacity that it's too dangerous to write them all offIn post 233, Prism wrote:Three active, strong posters.In post 225, borkjerfkin wrote:This is really the crux: curious as to why you think thisI think even without knowing them, and only seeing this game, this holds true, though.
VOTE: borkjerfkin
That's very different than what I'm saying first off, second I haven't liked any of your posts this game to begin with starting with the hint of a townread on ffery.In post 239, borkjerfkin wrote:Come on, this game isn't exactly filled w/ shlubs and I don't feel like they've been dominating the game in any real perceivable capacity that it's too dangerous to write them all off
in any event it's a really weird reason to vote me for asking about
I intend to play to my full strength but I'm not going to play town dictator again. Playing town dictator is not playing to my wincon.
Sadly, I think the game will end once we get the misguillotine in 5p meaning we can't crossvote in 3p and make Prism choose for the most supreme troll in site history. And hey, I like our odds of fooling them this way! I also do this like every game, so if skitter is scum (seems unlikely given that she has no scum PT access) she'll almost certainly dismiss this all as a joke.In post 238, Syryana wrote:Yay! I'm impressed you built on my plan to hide us from scum by pretending we're scum pretending with masons. We should see how many levels deep we can get before we endgame prism.In post 234, Mod Pizza wrote:We have a deal,In post 232, Syryana wrote:I'll hold off inducting prism if you hold off on this one for me for a bit.scummason buddy
what are you saying, then? and how is me not grokking it scummy?In post 242, Prism wrote:That's very different than what I'm saying first off
normally I'd shrug and let your "not liking my body of work" lie for the moment but I'd love to hear what you didn't like about that post in particularhint of a townread on ffery.