Large Normal 230 - Game Over

Glitch · Post Post #2725 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:18 pm

Idk maybe DGB is third party scum who, because she is wolf of alien, knows there is another scum faction and she wanted to let Nero live to help her eat away at town.

Idk that's kind of our there but still just saying

Glitch · Post Post #2726 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:21 pm

In post 2714, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 2709, Glitch wrote:
In post 2705, muh316 wrote:VOTE: Non lmh
This slot has been avoiding the conversation for a long time and has managed to dodge replacement.
This is the laziest take I think yoh could possibly make. Do you have reasons for your vote being placed on lmh other than the fact that they're low activity? Is that all you've got on page 483920166402?
Sure it's lazy, but kudos for going after a lursack on page 483535654402. It has to be done.

Fair. But if we are going after a lurker then we should go after a lurker who actually seems like scum, not just a lurker for the sake of just getting them out of the game. I'll probably end up voting may. She seems to have enough scummy vibes to be a decent pick so far. We will see as the day progressed as long as y'all don't freaking speed hammer again. -_-'

Glitch · Post Post #2727 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:22 pm

Oh look I caught up
This pace is much better
VOTE: May

Umlaut · Post Post #2728 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:23 pm

VOTE: Non Imh

I think going after lurkers actually makes a lot of sense right now. Assuming Nero

was

killed by the Mafia, if the whole team were present and active someone would have been hard against that kill. So unless one scum just strongarmed it over their buddies' objections (and that's pretty rare) I'd find it pretty likely that the team consists of multiple highly disengaged lurkers and maybe one seriously active player.

Glitch · Post Post #2729 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 1:42 pm

Is there an actual case on nonlmh because this is just the easiest opportunity for scum to stroll right in and power wagon a slot all because it's a lurker

ISO · Post Post #2730 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:32 pm

Votecount 3.1

Non lmh (2) - muh316, Umlaut
muh316 (2) - NoPowerOverMe, May
DrippingGoofball (1) - Albert B. Rampage
Albert B. Rampage (1) - DrippingGoofball
TheGoldenParadox (1) - Insanoflex
May (1) - Glitch

Not voting (5) - Non lmh, TheGoldenParadox, Gamma Emerald, Starbuck, innocentvillager

(expired on 2020-12-11 08:28:00) remain until day end

With 13 players alive, it takes 7 to reach a majority.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2731 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:36 pm

In post 2719, Insanoflex wrote:Best as I can tell Non Imh is like this in all their games. I don't feel like going for a policy vote today when we've had 2 straight day phases that were basically trolled.

I know but what are we going to do? Let it coast to end game?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2732 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:37 pm

In post 2723, Glitch wrote:
In post 2711, May wrote:i think DGB has been fairly towny
she has this towntell where she's supremely confident and has a "you're wrong and i'm obviously correct" tone to her
believe it or not, she's more reasonable and less commanding as scum
I don't see this kind of attitude from DGB at all when she's town

Meta is trash, folks. The answers are always in the game.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2733 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:39 pm

In post 2726, Glitch wrote:we should go after a lurker who actually seems like scum

How can you even tell the difference when we're talking about people that are barely posting?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2734 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:40 pm

In post 2729, Glitch wrote:Is there an actual case on nonlmh because this is just the easiest opportunity for scum to stroll right in and power wagon a slot all because it's a lurker

READ ALL OF NOM IMH's

4

POSTS

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2735 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:40 pm

Here go ahead and try to town read this:

In post 472, Non lmh wrote:Just got in, will catch up in an hour maybe two
Thanks for having me and sorry y'all

In post 796, Non lmh wrote:nc, nee, ge,, hard town

In post 805, Non lmh wrote:not for alignment, read order
am biased in favor of activity tho
guil is town for me, iv too

In post 1104, Non lmh wrote:
In post 807, muh316 wrote:
In post 805, Non lmh wrote:not for alignment, read order
am biased in favor of activity tho
guil is town for me, iv too
By that criteria you're most likely to be scum then
not following, how do you mean

TheGoldenParadox · Post Post #2736 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 2:52 pm

oh wow that's :^/

VOTE: umlaut to be honest this slot has never gotten better for me it has consistently just slipped just under the radar and gone with the (very easy) flow

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2737 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 4:17 pm

In post 2736, TheGoldenParadox wrote:oh wow that's :^/

VOTE: umlaut to be honest this slot has never gotten better for me it has consistently just slipped just under the radar and gone with the (very easy) flow

Look at Umlaut's behavior around Guillotina's shenanigans and tell me how that's scum.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2738 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 4:27 pm

In post 2712, muh316 wrote:
In post 2710, May wrote:don't know about that muh guy but i have a person pushing someone who is dead null after 109 pages
i will vote for that person
VOTE: muh
So one inactive person defending another inactive person. Nice.

Bluh
Can you three give takes on the ACTIVE players?

Glitch · Post Post #2739 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:11 pm

Yeah non lmh looks like 4 posts full of nothing, Idk how you can town read or scum read that shit. May has some questionable posts in her bleak ISO though.

Regardless, TGP please help us in any direction except umlaut. We are not lynching there today and even if you want it to happen you just aren't going to get enough traction to form a wagon on that slot. Umlaut is bleeding town to me.

NoPowerOverMe · Post Post #2740 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:24 pm

In theory I am fine with eliminating a lurker, but I am a little suspicious of the anti-lurker postrs tyring to get a quick elimination rather than pressuring the lurkers to post more.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2741 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:50 pm

In post 2740, NoPowerOverMe wrote:In theory I am fine with eliminating a lurker, but I am a little suspicious of the anti-lurker postrs tyring to get a quick elimination rather than pressuring the lurkers to post more.

Yeah this is about where I’m at

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #2742 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 6:00 pm

Non Imh and Starbuck if you don't post within 24h I am personally driving a bandwagon on one of you. And I plan on going all of the way.

innocentvillager · Post Post #2743 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 6:04 pm

how tf is non imh still in this game

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #2744 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 6:06 pm

In post 2743, innocentvillager wrote:how tf is non imh still in this game

my bad for that

innocentvillager · Post Post #2745 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 6:08 pm

In post 2731, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 2719, Insanoflex wrote:Best as I can tell Non Imh is like this in all their games. I don't feel like going for a policy vote today when we've had 2 straight day phases that were basically trolled.
I know but what are we going to do? Let it coast to end game?

lmao imagine them at f3, with essentially the same ISO

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #2746 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 6:11 pm

In post 2745, innocentvillager wrote:lmao imagine them at f3, with essentially the same ISO

trigger warning pls

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2747 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 6:59 pm

In post 2740, NoPowerOverMe wrote:In theory I am fine with eliminating a lurker, but I am a little suspicious of the anti-lurker postrs tyring to get a quick elimination rather than pressuring the lurkers to post more.

Sometimes votes can motivate.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #2748 (ISO) » Sat Nov 28, 2020 7:02 pm

Moti

vote

players LOL

innocentvillager · Post Post #2749 (ISO) » Sun Nov 29, 2020 5:20 am