oh, we aren't really massclaiming, but this does make sense then.In post 648, Battle Mage wrote:it's weird that i waited until a massclaim to claim?In post 646, Flavor Leaf wrote:it is kinda weird that it's just now coming up
i'd say, in the absence of a counter-claim, it's fairly likely to be true?In post 643, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm not implicating him in the death, just wondering what the chances are of this actually being true are.
well shit. i shot my shot i guess...In post 650, Flavor Leaf wrote:oh, we aren't really massclaiming, but this does make sense then.In post 648, Battle Mage wrote:it's weird that i waited until a massclaim to claim?In post 646, Flavor Leaf wrote:it is kinda weird that it's just now coming up
Might as well full send then.
it happened at the same time. At the start of Day, I was added to the neighbourhood, and Andres was confirmed dead. So now I'm a neighbour, with no special powers, in a defunct PT by myself.In post 649, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 644, Battle Mage wrote:lol I mean, we have a dead neighbouriser. I can confirm, he targetted me last night. It doesn't confirm my alignment one way or the other. But I can say, via the PT, Andres (like Ben) thought I was the towniest player.
the neighborhood was created prior to Andres dying? I thought he was a neighborizer, where you get the neighborhood when he successfully targets.
How could anyone counterclaim since your neighbor is dead unless they watched/tracked?In post 651, Battle Mage wrote:i'd say, in the absence of a counter-claim, it's fairly likely to be true?In post 643, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm not implicating him in the death, just wondering what the chances are of this actually being true are.
And why would I lie about it?
he said it in the PT before he died. or do you mean, how did he describe it?In post 656, Flavor Leaf wrote:but how did he say you were the towniest?
lol if I am pretending to be a neighbour for some idiotic reason, the real person who got neighbourised could claim it.In post 657, NoPowerOverMe wrote:How could anyone counterclaim since your neighbor is dead unless they watched/tracked?In post 651, Battle Mage wrote:i'd say, in the absence of a counter-claim, it's fairly likely to be true?In post 643, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm not implicating him in the death, just wondering what the chances are of this actually being true are.
And why would I lie about it?
we have a neighbouriserIn post 658, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Or they were recruited as a neighbor I guess. But any of those situations are highly unlikely.
Why was the PT created before he targeted you, is what I’m asking.In post 659, Battle Mage wrote:he said it in the PT before he died. or do you mean, how did he describe it?In post 656, Flavor Leaf wrote:but how did he say you were the towniest?
dunno, he had it since start of day 1, but didnt post in it until start of night 1In post 662, Flavor Leaf wrote:Why was the PT created before he targeted you, is what I’m asking.In post 659, Battle Mage wrote:he said it in the PT before he died. or do you mean, how did he describe it?In post 656, Flavor Leaf wrote:but how did he say you were the towniest?
Bro I just don’t get how you think. If it’s not true, what is the alternative that you think is more likely to be true?In post 663, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It just seems a wierd claim on surface level since your neighbor is the only one night killed so far. Not saying it's not true.
wouldnt that be true whoever was targetted though? like you know there is a dead neighbouriser, you can infer they targetted someone. Why would it be weird for someone to then acknowledge that they were targetted? You seem to be implying me being targetted is linked to him being dead, when the two are mechanically unrelated. It's still possible I'm scum, but the fact I got neighbourised doesn't make it more likely (I'd argue it makes it less, given both dead town players had me as their top townread).In post 663, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It just seems a wierd claim on surface level since your neighbor is the only one night killed so far. Not saying it's not true.
it doesnt validate my claim though, does it? If i hadnt been neighbourised, I'd be vanilla. Because I was neighbourised, I'm vanilla with a PT. what difference does it make??In post 668, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm not saying they're mechanically related, I'm saying it's possible you're using a townie's death to validate your claim. The fact that andres can't back up your claim for you makes me second guess you. Probability indicates you are telling the truth, but it just seems like a strange string of events to me.
of course he can't validate the claim - he is dead - he couldn't validate the claim of whoever he neighbourised. Are you saying you would have second guessed anyone who claimed to be the target? because that's what your stance implies, and it's frankly ridiculous. neighbours are not masons. If Andres was alive, all he could say is "I targetted BM last night, and he is a lovely chap". not alignment confirmation.In post 672, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm second guessing it because neighbors generally can validate each others claims, and in this case it can't, and the fact that andres died n1 just seems wierd to me.
