In post 644, Battle Mage wrote:lol I mean, we have a dead neighbouriser. I can confirm, he targetted me last night. It doesn't confirm my alignment one way or the other. But I can say, via the PT, Andres (like Ben) thought I was the towniest player.
the neighborhood was created prior to Andres dying? I thought he was a neighborizer, where you get the neighborhood when he successfully targets.
it happened at the same time. At the start of Day, I was added to the neighbourhood, and Andres was confirmed dead. So now I'm a neighbour, with no special powers, in a defunct PT by myself.
In post 663, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It just seems a wierd claim on surface level since your neighbor is the only one night killed so far. Not saying it's not true.
Bro I just don’t get how you think. If it’s not true, what is the alternative that you think is more likely to be true?
In post 663, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It just seems a wierd claim on surface level since your neighbor is the only one night killed so far. Not saying it's not true.
wouldnt that be true whoever was targetted though? like you know there is a dead neighbouriser, you can infer they targetted someone. Why would it be weird for someone to then acknowledge that they were targetted? You seem to be implying me being targetted is linked to him being dead, when the two are mechanically unrelated. It's still possible I'm scum, but the fact I got neighbourised doesn't make it more likely (I'd argue it makes it less, given both dead town players had me as their top townread).
I'm not saying they're mechanically related, I'm saying it's possible you're using a townie's death to validate your claim. The fact that andres can't back up your claim for you makes me second guess you. Probability indicates you are telling the truth, but it just seems like a strange string of events to me.
Mafia Record: Town 4-3 Mafia 0-1 Third Party 1-0 Total 5-4
"NPOM you can do apparently whatever the fuck you want this game." - Alduskkel
In post 668, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm not saying they're mechanically related, I'm saying it's possible you're using a townie's death to validate your claim. The fact that andres can't back up your claim for you makes me second guess you. Probability indicates you are telling the truth, but it just seems like a strange string of events to me.
it doesnt validate my claim though, does it? If i hadnt been neighbourised, I'd be vanilla. Because I was neighbourised, I'm vanilla with a PT. what difference does it make?? of course he can't validate the claim - he is dead - he couldn't validate the claim of whoever he neighbourised. Are you saying you would have second guessed anyone who claimed to be the target? because that's what your stance implies, and it's frankly ridiculous.
lol even if i got counterclaimed so scum could 1v1 me or something, the question remains - why does BM pretend to be neighbourised when it achieves nothing in terms of towncred, and he is already unanimously townread? it makes zero strategic sense.
I'm second guessing it because neighbors generally can validate each others claims, and in this case it can't, and the fact that andres died n1 just seems wierd to me.
Mafia Record: Town 4-3 Mafia 0-1 Third Party 1-0 Total 5-4
"NPOM you can do apparently whatever the fuck you want this game." - Alduskkel
In post 672, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I'm second guessing it because neighbors generally can validate each others claims, and in this case it can't, and the fact that andres died n1 just seems wierd to me.
neighbours are not masons. If Andres was alive, all he could say is "I targetted BM last night, and he is a lovely chap". not alignment confirmation.