In post 880, MathBlade wrote: In post 879, Titus wrote: In post 876, MathBlade wrote: In post 310, TheGoldenParadox wrote:You are a 2-Shot Neighborizer, and aligned with the Town. You may post in the thread and vote as you see fit.
Abilities:
~ Twice during the game, at Night, you may neighborize a player by sending a PM to the moderator. If your action succeeds, regardless of whether you live or die, that player will be added to your Neighborhood at the start of the next Day.
Hood existed people get added.
I expect BM with Andres’s last reads.
I'll let this play out. I have my own opinions but it's not worth getting in the way here since I misunderstood partially. I still think you're going off an assumption and should look for more persuasive methods.
Even if you're assumption is wrong, BM claiming to be the target is just noise without data.
What assumption am I going off of?
BM claimed something, I am verifying the claim. What “assumption” is there since no one counter claimed? If someone did BM would be lock scum.
you're both better than this. and we have already bled this topic dry, but to briefly summarise:
I was neighbourised last night, and claimed today.
It has no bearing whatsoever on my alignment.
The hypothetical benefit for scum-BM fakeclaiming it, would I guess be being able to claim a dead townie's reads (in this economy, not worth much, more to the pity)
The hypothetical risk for scum-BM fakeclaiming it, is being counter-claimed and looking like a tart.
So to be clear, I'd have to be a moron to fakeclaim neighbour here, because it wouldn't benefit me in the least. Therefore if someone did counterclaim, I clearly wouldn't be "lock-scum". I guess it's then a question of who is the dumbass who wants a 1v1.
i genuinely wish i hadnt bothered claiming honestly, because it's just wasted so much energy.