In post 0, Thestatusquo wrote:If you are alone with an imposter in a room during the night phase they will be given the option to kill you. Only one extra imposter kill can happen per night.
ok yeah, +100 to +3 person groups, ideally.
but you know, we have an odd number of players
so we could like.... have more than 3.
"Taly is going to be a hot mess all game and I am entertained" ~ Gammagooey
"The human race is bad at reading Taly." ~the worst
"Taly I knew your slot was scum and I still struggled to find arguments to SR your play lol" ~Infinity 324
"Taly wins for the most fence-sitty reads in a game ever" ~Battle Mage
In post 578, SirCakez wrote:I think Pooky/Ali/BM group is actually super trustworthy and we should make sure they are with different groups so they can "secure" each one
I actually don’t have a reason to trust pooky yet. I also am just slow when it comes to trusting people though so...
In post 580, Titus wrote:If I get mislimmed day one, there's little I can do. I have accepted that with this game state. I have an easy task if I slowly post day 2.
That being said, I do feel my wagon is scum driven though. Consensus is gathering around no elimination but yet people vote me for actually voting for it.
Here are my actual weak reads though.
HC is scum riding off town Reck's coattails to disrupt the game.
BM is scum for waiting on a consensus before voting me. His position on me is just hot garbage in his ISO. He appeared fine when it was just me and him going to electrical but sad when Ali was added to the mix. That would have three in electrical. Removing me makes two in electrical.
Treating this like you treat the game, you can either run around and hope you don't get murderised, or you try and group up. A lot of the time the grouping up doesn't happen until there's smaller numbers despite the obvious advantages.
Actually having sat and thought about it (owwie ( ⚆ _ ⚆ ) ).
1-2 tasks each, taking between 1 and 2 room phases. Min 1 phase, max 4 Phases. 4 Phases is incredibly unlikely.
2-3 is likely the average.
Going for a task victory alone isn't going to work I don't think. We know there's probably sabotage things that can be done, and I think it's a safe assumption that each player ejection would add another phase at least for the first 2 or 3 phases?
Be like a carrot on the end of the stick kinda thing I reckon, we'll get to it but it'll always just be out of reach...
I think that scum probably has to play well to prevent a task victory.
But there's a reason you don't go for the scholar's mate every game in chess, optimal play involves assuming your opponent will play well.
I still think the stuff we've learned so far has been super useful. And I still think that full mass claim probably isn't necessary to get enough info to leash.
If we know that there's going to be 3+ people in cafeteria, weapons and nav then people who haven't claimed know where to go to be safe.
In post 528, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: reckoner
Nah, not letting you act like you’re willing to play ball and then try to run away with it when you realize you have to play fair
this stance weirds me out. Not sure what teh reason is to be paranoid tbh. Maybe it just doesn’t matter tho.
Suffice to say I'm not going back to school with you, you bully .( ̵˃﹏˂̵ )
I’m not that hard to read :/
In fairness I caught on pretty quick to your alignment, it was more the NK of me and WIFOM your way out of it that has me watching you (̿▀̿ ̿Ĺ̯̿̿▀̿ ̿)̄
In post 528, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: reckoner
Nah, not letting you act like you’re willing to play ball and then try to run away with it when you realize you have to play fair
In post 641, SirCakez wrote:Alisae do you think people opposing the massclaim/no-elim plan are scummy?
I will say that I’m definitely the most interested in haschel, but I am not sure on if they’re scummy. I feel like there has to be some town that don’t want to go along with it, and there is probably some scum that are going along with it.
I feel like its best to figure out the motivation from both sides tbh