Not at all imoIn post 2372, Blitzo wrote:Pedit - Okay I guess but is that really a bad thing?
I'm not the one promoting that idea as meaning anything rn anyway
Not at all imoIn post 2372, Blitzo wrote:Pedit - Okay I guess but is that really a bad thing?
I am only satisfyied with page 69.
lol I didn't even have to read who made this post to know. Random attack on Pooky for no good reason. Blitzo for sure.In post 2372, Blitzo wrote:Pooky not being here is definitely suspect.
It fits with his modus operandi from last game of only popping in when his neck was on the line.
It was extremely apparent towards EoD of day 1 and this sort of mirrors that.
Pedit - Okay I guess but is that really a bad thing?
Above @Gamma ofc.
PEDIT 2 - BM that is a blatant misrepresentation of the points I'm making.
I think they reallyIn post 2370, Battle Mage wrote:is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.
I think it would be comparing apples to oranges, given I've focused on LOTS of people (most of the votes on me are for my volatile voting) and been involved in lots of discussions. Titus has literally only really shown up to say "yeah BM scum".In post 2373, Taly wrote:Consequences ofIn post 2366, Gamma Emerald wrote:how are you weighing these rn?In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.
I agree withBM'sassessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with aTitusflip.
I feel likeHaschel'ssole-minded focus onTitusis still really weird.
I don't likeTGP'slast minute rally to limHascheleven though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree withAkarin'sperception ofHaschel'sreply,Titusis a townread for several of my townreads.TitusorHCpotential townflip. I agree withMurder, I have issue findingHaschin a specific solve right now.
I will say, I'm good with the night plan.
p-edit
And to play devil's advocate, is it accurate to say you've focused a lot onBattle Mage wrote:question for you Taly - is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.In post 2363, Taly wrote:Fuck.
I agree withBM'sassessment that my understanding of the game is best approached with aTitusflip.
I feel likeHaschel'ssole-minded focus onTitusis still really weird.
I don't likeTGP'slast minute rally to limHascheleven though I somewhat wagoned him earlier.
While I disagree withAkarin'sperception ofHaschel'sreply,Titusis a townread for several of my townreads.TitusD1?
But I don't have any out-of-game beef with Haschel? Where is that coming from?In post 2374, Battle Mage wrote:as i say, i'm comfortable believing you're town and just not being able to see past your personal feelings towards Haschel on this one. i've been there too.
why would Titus have heat at you? You're doing everything you can to save her?In post 2380, Akarin wrote:I think they reallyIn post 2370, Battle Mage wrote:is Haschel's sole-minded focus on Titus any worse than Titus' sole-minded focus on me? I think not, therefore I think Titus is the play for you.aredifferent. Titus has talked about other stuff and seems apathetic about the game overall. Haschel's only other posts about anything else were like a 1-off question to Flea about DGB and otherwise, despite not posting much he's been very emphatic and seemingly passionate, just busy IRL (I presume).
Like that heat at me I'm seeing from Haschel isn't coming from Titus and I think that's a pretty key difference here.
Do you get that it's really difficult to take this as a good-faith effort at communication on your part?In post 2383, Battle Mage wrote:why would Titus have heat at you? You're doing everything you can to save her?
Yes.
I didn't say 'out of game'. You said earlier you were upset he didn't respond to a case you made, and that you didn't necessarily like him. Separately, you acknowledged your attack on him was partially motivated by that personal animosity.In post 2382, Akarin wrote:But I don't have any out-of-game beef with Haschel? Where is that coming from?In post 2374, Battle Mage wrote:as i say, i'm comfortable believing you're town and just not being able to see past your personal feelings towards Haschel on this one. i've been there too.
lol dude, a bit rich criticising me for reading, when all your posts are complaining that nothing makes sense.In post 2386, Blitzo wrote:@MC - I think that our best bet is to elim.
I think giving out all our whereabouts was not a good strategy for a task win.
I've been over this several times at this point.
@BM - nah, akarin asked about pooky and I responded.
Good job reading the thread.
In post 2388, Battle Mage wrote:You said earlier you were upset he didn't respond to a case you made, and that you didn't necessarily like him. Separately, you acknowledged your attack on him was partially motivated by that personal animosity.
given this post, a good chunk of the reasoning to lim HC is rather undercutIn post 2392, Haschel Cedricson wrote:There will be multiple people there with me assuming the rest of you follow the spreadsheet.