Spoiler: NotAJumbleOfNumbers ISO
1st post is just answers to my RQS.
In post 18, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote: I don't think "conserve your energy" really applies here? It's only day 1, and there are nights to help you recharge.
In post 109, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:How competent, exactly? Are there any further restrictions on becoming an SE? Are you an SE there too?In post 97, ben dover123 wrote:@above I was born in a world of Mafia where SE's are considered to teach newbies and be extremely competent.
Only focusing on me.In post 110, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:I...what? Why can't we just let off-topic chats be off-topic chats?In post 93, ben dover123 wrote:I seriously want to have a talk with you, but such a off-topic argument gets in the way quickly and before you know it we are deathtunneling each other.
Decent questions but tbh it seems like a small nudge rather than a attempt to solve my alignment, like clidd said.In post 194, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote: Okay, now this is something I have an issue with. You can't just assert everyone can just look like they're a townie easily, without a problem. I'll use myself as an example here: I have trouble at timesjust posting in the thread, let alone looking "obvious town".
Also, I found a few questions for you that aren't really related to what I just said, but they seem fine to tack on:
In 15, you suddenly defend your choice of not voting in RVS unprompted. Why?
In 69, you said you were probably going to "recede your leadership and proactive role", but you're still posting as frequently as before. Why?
This was a controversial readlist at the time. I'm not sure what his reason to SR me was.In post 193, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Quick update so I don't fall out of this game entirely: Ben is slightly leaning scum to me, Chumbo seems town, Clidd is basically null right now, Trendall also seems town, everyone else hasn't posted enough to really read on.
This was pointed out by nearly everybody, and it's kind of a weak push towards Chumbo.In post 195, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:I'm not sure why this was received badly? Later on he showed that he could at least give a one-line summary while on VLA, so that just begs the question of why he didn't just say it in his VLA post.In post 153, Chumbo wrote:You have been afk long enough to get prodded (about 37 hours), and now you go VLA without offering anything? I don't like this at all.
Uh...not really a helpful or relevant post.In post 196, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:I don't thinkIn post 161, Trendall wrote:Chumbo is most likely to be mafia here, as they're complaining about ben trying to 'look town' while at the same time complaining about 'this guy isn't posting enough!' and 'this guy hasn't answered my question!' (please nobody interpret this post as an answer to Chumbo's question). Classic mafia stuff - easy, obvious, and irrelevant things to pick up and complain about.not posting enoughis an irrelevant thing, though. In addition, the two sides of "not enough posts" and "trying too hard to look town" aren't necessarily opposites to each other. You can have a lower post count than wanted and still look LAMISTy.
Why does it feel like Jumble was overusing this defense of "I just can't post my thoughts"? Other than that not much to comment about this post. 110 was a question asking "Why can't I have off-topic chats", which doesn't classify as a good question in my books, but that is just my opinion about 110.In post 197, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Withdrawn? Yes. But that's just been a problem I've had in general with mafia. Everything's so hard to understand as someone who doesn't know much about the game and it can be tempting to just hold your thoughts to yourself so you don't look bad. And I think 110 is still a good question to ask.In post 178, clidd wrote:Posts 109 and 110 dripped me in the sense that he seemed withdrawn and not very committed to solving Ben's alignment, something I can theorize more in a newbie!Scum scenario.