In post 1908, Spiffeh wrote:Becoming more and more ok with a BattleMage elim
Not thrilled with his approach to Double Trouble, holding a scum read on them is fine but I feel like his catch up has an ulterior motive of calling Double Trouble scummy at every opportunity for reasons that aren't all that compelling. It's like he went into his catchup with the intention of painting Double Trouble in a scummy light rather than naturally coming to that conclusion as he read.
Funnily enough, he's also projecting, by saying that *I* had the intention of painting *him* in a scummy light rather than naturally coming to that conclusion as I found evidence.
Butyeah,
In post 1908, Spiffeh wrote:And it's very CONVENIENT that he chose Double Trouble to do this to because they are apart of the Pooky's PoE and probably the most likely elimination after himself
And in Xenoblade 2 he was effortlessly town and after his latest catchup posts I'm not getting that vibe at all
This is not Battle Mage as town even remotely, and his push on Double the Trouble is TMI from him having known the elimination pool of 4 before he should've had this knowledge.
In post 1912, Battle Mage wrote:which ordinarily might be TSTBS but with FL coaching nothing would surprise me.
Ydrasse - I just dont know. Probably town based on meta, but something about the bombastic attitude here feels Flavorsome. And I think Ydrasse might be more excited about trying to one-up Pooky here.
By the way, Battle Mage.
You've repeatedly gone on record as saying, "we shouldn't townread a player for being in their town meta, because FL could be coaching them".
So if you genuinely believe that a player looking to be in their town meta cannot be trusted to be town, and IF you insist that this is your town meta (it's not)--why should we trust that when by your own logic, we shouldn't trust you to be town off of meta?