okay, so that's a big ol jumble of words. let me see if I can tease this out into discrete points. I'm gonna ignore the stuff I didn't ask for. I'm not really trying to argue against anything Gamma is saying, I'm just trying to translate this into something I have an easier time parsing.
In post 753, Gamma Emerald wrote:VP has been railing Pooky for the challenge being anti-town but I feel like anyone who actually tries to read the non-challenge members based on their handling of the challenge should be able to form reads just fine.
-VP has been saying that Pooky is anti-town because an early challenge stifled discussion. However, you should be able to get behavioral tells off of the other players so this point is moot.
I also think he used an emotional weak point of Noraa's to sic her on me and Pooky, and when called out he tried to act like we were being sexist when really it would look the same
regardless of the gender roles
, and I honestly think trying to make it out to be something it's not like that is just, scummy both in the context of the game and just as a general principle.
-VP is manipulating noraa to attack Gamma and Pooky in a way that Gamma does not specify. Additionally, it was scummy to say that Pooky and Gamma were being sexist because they weren't being sexist. Saying it was sexist is an attempt at misrepresenting what they were saying for advantage in the game, also it is just a bad thing to do on a personal level.
I also dislike his allegation that I've blanket agreed with Pooky, yes I think Pooky's takes are sound but I have my own thoughts that at this point I feel I've been pretty vocal about, so that's a rather solid misrep atp.
-VP has said that Gamma has agreed with everything Pooky says. Gamma thinks Pooky has good takes, but has not agreed with everything Pooky said so this is misrep.
He's also among the party currently doing the "scummy = scum" fallacy with his reasons for voting Noraa recently. Like, If Noraa is being weird, you should
try to sort her
, not take it as scum behavior immediately.
-VP is saying "scummy = scum", which other people are doing as well.
That goes back to Pooky's issue regarding VP's initial trust of Noraa despite getting snowed by her. The general trend of VP's play around Noraa is he's acting on things without doing the necessarey legwork to validate his opinions, which seems like scum who has the answers already.
-VP seems like he's doing post-hoc justification regarding noraa. Pooky has pointed this out.
__________________
So it seems like the essence of what Gamma is saying is
a. Gamma feels that VP is misrepping him
b. Gamma feels that VP is acting inconsistently towards noraa
Does that look right?