In post 1882, Kanna wrote:“No Launch” is not possible. If a majority launch is not achieved, plurality will decide.
VC to come soon!
In post 1889, Kanna wrote:The last person with a vote will be the launch. Any unresolvable cases will result in a random town launch. No launch is not possible!
because part of the reason i was wary of the hopkirk wagon was because infinity was on itIn post 3296, team rocket queen wrote:because i had previously said i thought gypyx was town, because i had given reasoning i thought hopkirk might be mafia, because hopkirk had just called me dumb when infinity switched his voteIn post 3294, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:why would they expect you to switch from gyp to hopkirk?
@Jessie, did you miss this?At the start of the game, the 6 of them were told that if any of them die in the first two launches, they will instantly lose.
no i was saying that the conspirators did not know that the town would be told this.In post 3302, Gloria Cleary wrote:@Jessie, did you miss this?
does town!isis hammering gypyx seem likely there to either of you?In post 3304, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:So how does the scumteam know/gambit Isis stays offline/doesn't hammer Gyp?
@Pooky I know you’re really good at mechanics. Is what Jessie saying make sense because I don’t know why one of Hopkirk’s strongest trs needs to prove himself like this?In post 3299, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like i'm pretty sure it would be first wagon to reach 6 that gets launched
if it was the last, somebody could just unvote and revote to game the system.
if it's ties always result in town launches, then a person placing a tying vote is directly scum-claiming and signalling the person they voted has to be town.
The point is that SCUM knew this and for you to argue Infinity!scum, you would need to explain why scum takes the risk that no townie hammers Gypyx in that 3 hour time span.In post 3305, team rocket queen wrote:no i was saying that the conspirators did not know that the town would be told this.In post 3302, Gloria Cleary wrote:@Jessie, did you miss this?
but i just explained this over the past couple pagesIn post 3308, Gloria Cleary wrote:you would need to explain why scum takes the risk that no townie hammers Gypyx in that 3 hour time span.
If Pooky had stayed on him, possibly. Because Hopkirk really obvtowned close to deadline but you’re essentially arguing that scum takes the chance of losing the game on the gambit that town!Isis is guaranteed not to switch her vote?In post 3306, team rocket queen wrote:does town!isis hammering gypyx seem likely there to either of you?In post 3304, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:So how does the scumteam know/gambit Isis stays offline/doesn't hammer Gyp?
But what if Pooky had remained on Gypyx? If your argument is that Flea his his buddy, then how could scum have known that Pooky would switch to Hopkirk?In post 3309, team rocket queen wrote:but i just explained this over the past couple pagesIn post 3308, Gloria Cleary wrote:you would need to explain why scum takes the risk that no townie hammers Gypyx in that 3 hour time span.
town!isis seems very unlikely to switch her vote in that situation to me, so it seems somewhat likely to me that the conspirators might have felt this way, yes.In post 3310, Gloria Cleary wrote:If Pooky had stayed on him, possibly. Because Hopkirk really obvtowned close to deadline but you’re essentially arguing that scum takes the chance of losing the game on the gambit that town!Isis is guaranteed not to switch her vote?
I’m going to check this out before I comment any further.In post 2648, Infinity 324 wrote:@Gloria A couple scum games of mine recently ended
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go
i thought it was possible that pooky would not have had to for hopkirk still to have been eliminated, though i may have been misinterpreting kanna's postsIn post 3311, Gloria Cleary wrote:But what if Pooky had remained on Gypyx? If your argument is that Flea his his buddy, then how could scum have known that Pooky would switch to Hopkirk?In post 3309, team rocket queen wrote:but i just explained this over the past couple pagesIn post 3308, Gloria Cleary wrote:you would need to explain why scum takes the risk that no townie hammers Gypyx in that 3 hour time span.
i will do the sameIn post 3313, Gloria Cleary wrote:I’m going to check this out before I comment any further.
i think she is confusing 2 different rulesIn post 3307, Gloria Cleary wrote:@Pooky I know you’re really good at mechanics. Is what Jessie saying make sense because I don’t know why one of Hopkirk’s strongest trs needs to prove himself like this?
You need to bold this.In post 3298, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:@mod what happens at deadline if the votes are tied at 6-6 ?
Yeah, I’m extremely confused by how this works.In post 3317, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i think she is confusing 2 different rulesIn post 3307, Gloria Cleary wrote:@Pooky I know you’re really good at mechanics. Is what Jessie saying make sense because I don’t know why one of Hopkirk’s strongest trs needs to prove himself like this?
the mod will clarify how the eliminations actually work at a 6-6 tie whenever he wakes up.
In post 3319, Gloria Cleary wrote:You need to bold this.In post 3298, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:@mod what happens at deadline if the votes are tied at 6-6 ?
In post 3322, Gloria Cleary wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... B%5D=34888
Flea towngame
I couldn’t find any Flea scumgames but fae were a lot more serious in that game.
In post 3323, Gloria Cleary wrote:In post 3322, Gloria Cleary wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... B%5D=34888
Flea towngame
I couldn’t find any Flea scumgames but fae were a lot more serious in that game.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... B%5D=34888
Another Flea towngame. I will re - ISO them in Death Curse but these games are making me lean to Flea!scum here.