In post 782, The Bulge wrote: In post 707, Titus wrote:I'll respond to 580 tomorrow in more detail if needed tomorrow but I'll do a short reply now.
1) Baltar should have hesitation about following someone using methods that aren't likely to catch scum from his PoV. I'm using following meaning voting after, not sheeping.
2) Contradictions tell a lot about alignment. If he was town, I would expect some sort of reassessment after being shown the contradiction. Something like maybe I'm not ok with executing anyone. My bet is there's at least one partner in the don't execute list.
3) I believe this was covered but both wagons on me are mostly the same slots. I still feel both sets of scum are on my wagon.
1. so if you disagree with someone's method but arrive at the same conclusion, you should ignore your own conclusions?
2. that is pretty weak. you quoted the post twice as is, like it was some kind of damning scumslip
3. doesn't really answer my question. what is giving you that feeling in the first place?
1) No. You should reconsider them but not discard them entirely.
2) I get my questions answered. If I had missed this post again, you probably would do the same.
3) I already answered this. I am a safe place for both sets of scum. I am not aligned with either. It makes sense for scum (like MURDERCAT) to do everything they can to keep my wagon viable.
As for Datisi and VP, I TR both.
VP has no reason to bus a partner yesterday. That eliminates him from being mafia. If he's a wolf, he doesn't give a rats ass if I am executed. In fact, if he's familiar with my play, he'd want that. If Kylne is town, it would be the same thing. So the only viable way this slot is scum is if he feared that Kylne would somehow be executed over me. That position doesn't make sense with galaxii's EoD posting. Given only one possible partnership, I am pretty ok calling this town.
As for Datisti, he waffled on me all of yesterday. Him wanting me to show my alignment makes sense.
