no, i said that i have a +++scumread on you *if there's more than 2 scum in your thread*, which is not at all the same thing, adn something that i can't really assess right nowIn post 480, Imperium wrote:Skitter's 774 over there is kinda garbage since she's got a ++++scum read on us.
i dont really know uIn post 807, upside down sinkhole wrote:fire bringer can you read me correctly?
shouldn't u be SRing me then?In post 808, skitter30 wrote:noraa i'm townreading you for like exactly three posts that you made but just abt everything you've posted has been p awful ngl
helpful.In post 809, Firebringer wrote:i dont really know uIn post 807, upside down sinkhole wrote:fire bringer can you read me correctly?
the three posts were very impactful. but you're doing a p good job at wearing away at themIn post 810, upside down sinkhole wrote:shouldn't u be SRing me then?In post 808, skitter30 wrote:noraa i'm townreading you for like exactly three posts that you made but just abt everything you've posted has been p awful ngl
In post 489, zMuffinMan wrote:shelly could be town i guess but there's nothing town in that ISO and posting reads like that isn't exactly hard to do? more concerned with whether i believe the reasoning for it, which i don't really. that's like 2 incredibly weak "meta" reads and not much else
god i hope ur not one of those people who i townread when i get annoyed at them.In post 811, upside down sinkhole wrote:helpful.In post 809, Firebringer wrote:i dont really know uIn post 807, upside down sinkhole wrote:fire bringer can you read me correctly?
which? I'm a bit more lost on that read than ffery seems to be and and coming into the game w/ a self-proclaimed "I'm going to do fuckall and hope people defend me for it" doesn't give me an avenue to figure it outIn post 812, skitter30 wrote:the three posts were very impactful.
just tell me ur teammates as a christmas present to us allIn post 820, skitter30 wrote:i'm not elaborating on it rn, sorry. i don't think it will be beneficial at this time.
(yes, i'm aware that i'm being vague and that this isn't helping you with the read, but i'm saying it's not a good idea anyways)
I have to walk this back - I had a very particular reason for making it and upon reread I think I was wrong about that assumption. Back to null.In post 381, Deacon Blues wrote:i actually feel considerably strong about brian town now that i know what's what
-bourbon
oh this i'm pretty sure i said:In post 818, Deacon Blues wrote:Also I am going through your ISO and I can't really figure out what you're actually scumreading annie for
@skitter
what does scum have to gain from buddying people in other thread exactlyIn post 823, skitter30 wrote:-> buddying brian (already explained this one)