In post 80, petapan wrote:why did you ignore mikul's vote on you to answer me instead?
I considered it, but I felt like I'd been up front about my reasons for acting like I did. I'm happy to follow up on some of his points, though.
Additionally, safebet222 stepped in. I was interested to see what responses that got, if any.
The stuff that most stood out to me from Mikul:
Mikul wrote:also to note, he can be scared because he is mafia and getting pressure as well. So being scared doesn't mean he is town. It gives him at least better odds of being town, and the fear of playing in the game could be there. But as I said, it could also be that he thinks he fucked up as scum when unwnd pointed out that he was trying to justify his votes in the rvs stage and then he felt the need to be defensive and further explain that vote and his though process.
Could be, but I don't think I come into game 1 joking then fold under pressure as first game first time mafia. More likely that I bother my partner in the mafia only thread, strategize a little, and model my opening messages after something I read in a thread somewhere. This isn't to say I'm not going to take my town game seriously, it's just to say that I would probably take a much safer line than "he hoo funny empathy play".
Mikul wrote:This is obvious newb town or nervous scum.
Frankly, I agree. I think one is a lot more likely than the other.
In my first post, I said:
In post 28, quiet wrote:Sorry I'm late. Excited to be here! Absolutely no experience playing Mafia via forms, though some experience with hidden role games more generally. While waiting for a newbie game, I read through some previous games, and spent some quality time with the wiki, but I get the sense that none of that will really compare to the real thing.
To properly roleplay my naïveté, it feels only right and natrual to sheep for unwnd. @unwnd, please be my guiding hand, teach me the ways of killing scum.
His first response:
In post 45, Mikul wrote:This bothers me because it comes off as a half ass buddying attempt. It's also meant to install humor or emotion into his opening post. Maybe it's because he's new and trying to break in with a good intro or maybe to try and get empathy which is a typical scum tactic.
I don't think my post reads as trying to get empathy, at least not from unwnd. If anything, it was a bit of a joke at his expense (hopefully taken in the way it was intended, lightly); the dynamic up to that point in the thread was that his offer to stand back and let newbies take the forefront, to teach his idea of scumhunting, etc, was a little condescending (not saying it was or it wasn't, it was just the dynamic in the thread), so I figured, what the hell, I'm a newbie, this is as good a way as any to enter, especially in a round that is mostly about randomness and pushing people into making reads/giving information that can be used in later rounds.
In post 54, Mikul wrote:The second point is that he is aware of what rvs is. Whether that is from research, asking the mod, however you want to say he learned it. If he is aware of what RVS, he is also aware that it's random. If it's random, then why try to justify your vote and then become defensive about it. Why also hedge that vote with qualifiers.
My experience is watching Super Mafia AllStars vods on twitch/youtube, playing mafia with very casual friends in a time before Covid, and reading a bunch of articles on strategy because it's interesting to me. RVS is like, one of the very first concepts you would pick up on, because it happens at the start of basically every game. I wanted to explain my rational behind voting because discussing your thinking is the best way (read-only way I know) to give and get reads, and people asked me to.
Do you think it would have been better to give that response after he voted/sused me?